Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/481,245

OPTICAL MODULE, WAVELENGTH ADAPTIVE COHERENT OPTICAL COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND COMPUTER STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 05, 2023
Examiner
BELLO, AGUSTIN
Art Unit
2635
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Innolight Technology (Suzhou) Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
679 granted / 901 resolved
+13.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
925
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
39.9%
-0.1% vs TC avg
§102
45.5%
+5.5% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 901 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by SAKAI (Publication No.: US 2014/0328588 A1). Regarding claim 1, 6, 10, SAKAI teaches An optical module, comprising: a local oscillator laser configured to output a local oscillator light (reference numeral 22 in Figure 4) ; a receiving module (reference numeral 21 in Figure 4) configured to receive an input light signal and a local oscillator light signal; a mixing module (reference numeral 21 in Figure 4) configured to mix the input light signal and the local oscillator light signal to obtain a beat frequency signal; and a digital signal processing module (reference numeral 25, 31, 32 in Figure 4) at least configured to calculate a beat frequency signal frequency of the beat frequency signal, and adjust the local oscillator light frequency output by the local oscillator laser through a feedback control loop according to the beat frequency signal frequency. Regarding claim 2, SAKAI teaches The optical module according to claim 1, wherein the optical module further comprises a digital-to-analog conversion module (reference numeral 24 in Figure 4) , the digital-to-analog conversion module is configured to convert a signal mixed by the mixing module into a digital signal, and the digital signal is sent to the digital signal processing module. Regarding claim 3, 7, there being no claimed structural difference between the apparatus of the claimed invention and that of the cited prior art, SAKAI teaches The optical module according to claim 2, wherein a formula for calculating a mixing signal /beat of the beat frequency signal frequency by the digital signal processing module is: I.sub.beat(t)=I.sub.Lo+I.sub.S+2m√{square root over (I.sub.LO.Math.I.sub.S)} cos (2πf.sub.IFt+(θ.sub.LO−θ.sub.S)) f.sub.IFf.sub.LO−f.sub.S, wherein, I.sub.LO is an optical intensity of the local oscillator light signal, I.sub.S is an optical intensity of the input light signal, m is a mixing efficiency of the local oscillator light and the input light, f.sub.IF is a beat frequency signal frequency, f.sub.LO is a local oscillator light frequency, θ.sub.LO is an initial phase of the local oscillator light, f.sub.S is an input light frequency, θ.sub.S is an initial phase of the input light, and a frequency difference between the local oscillator light and the input light is obtained by measuring f.sub.IF through the formula. Examiner further notes that SAKAI meets the limitations of this claim by virtue of the fact that SAKAI clearly calculates the beat frequency of the mixed signal and Applicant broadly claims that the recited formula is but one of the many formulas applicable in finding the beat frequency of the mixed signal without claiming that the recited formula is actually the one used in the claimed invention to find the beat frequency. Regarding claim 4, 8, SAKAI teaches The optical module according to claim 3, wherein the digital signal processing module is configured as: when a value of the beat frequency signal frequency is greater than a preset threshold value, the digital-to-analog conversion module (reference numeral 24 in Figure 4) generates a control signal to adjust the local oscillator light frequency until a beat frequency signal frequency is less than the preset threshold value (e.g. “threshold” as in paragraph [0107] and throughout) . Regarding claim 5, 9, SAKAI teaches The optical module according to claim 3, wherein the digital signal processing module (reference numeral 25, 31, 32 in Figure 4) is configured as: when the beat frequency signal frequency is not zero, the digital-to-analog conversion module generates a control signal to adjust the local oscillator light frequency until the beat frequency signal frequency is equal to zero (e.g. “frequency offset becomes zero” as in paragraph [0087]) . Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AGUSTIN BELLO whose telephone number is (571)272-3026. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 9 AM - 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Payne can be reached at (571)272-3024. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AGUSTIN BELLO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2635
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 05, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596229
3D TAPERED NANOPHOTONIC WAVEGUIDE TO FIBER EDGE COUPLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12580673
OPTICAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING OPTICAL SUBCARRIERS HAVING DIFFERENT SPECTRAL WIDTHS AND/OR POWER VALUES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580657
OUT-OF-BAND COMMUNICATION CHANNEL FOR SUBCARRIER-BASED OPTICAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571974
ADAPTER, CONNECTOR, AND OPTO-ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574110
MODULAR CELL SITE INSTALLATION, TESTING, MEASUREMENT, AND MAINTENANCE TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 901 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month