Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/482,573

CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION FOR SPATIAL DOMAIN ADAPTATION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 06, 2023
Examiner
MATTIS, JASON E
Art Unit
2461
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
672 granted / 875 resolved
+18.8% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
905
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§103
50.8%
+10.8% vs TC avg
§102
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
§112
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 875 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 19 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 19 ends in a repeated period. It is recommended that the extra period be deleted. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 6-8, 10-14, 16-20, 23, and 26-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Gao et al. (U.S. Publication US 2025/0266871 A1). With respect to claims 1 and 18, Gao et al. discloses an apparatus for wireless communication, comprising: one or more memories; and one or more processors coupled to the one or more memories, the one or more processors individually or collectively configured to perform a method of wireless communication as a user equipment (UE) (See the abstract, paragraphs 249-250, and Figure 10 of Gao et al. for reference to a UE and comprising a memory coupled to processing circuitry via a bus an executing instructions to perform a method of wireless communication). Gao et al. also discloses receive a channel state information (CSI) report configuration that indicates a CSI reference signal (CSI-RS) resource set for channel measurement (See paragraph 153 and Figure 5 of Gao et al. for reference to UE receiving a configuration from a network node comprising a set of N CSI-RS resources for channel measurement). Gao et al. further discloses wherein the CSI-RS resource set is associated with a first one or more CSI-RS resources included in a first resource group and a second one or more CSI-RS resources included in a second resource group (See paragraph 155 of Gao et al. for reference to the configuration indicating a first subset of CSI-RS ports referred to as a first CSI-RS port group, which is a first resource group, and indicating a second subset of ports referred to as a second CSI-RS port group, which is a second resource group). Gao et al. also discloses wherein the CSI report configuration further indicates a sub-configuration indicating at least one of: first configuration information for the first resource group and second configuration information for the second resource group, or third configuration information associated with one or more pairs of resources from the first resource group and the second resource group (See paragraphs 155-156 of Gao et al. for reference to embodiments of the configuration wherein different parameter combinations may be configured for different CSI-RS resources, i.e. different parameter combinations configured for different CSI-RS groups, which equates to the claimed first configuration information and second configuration information). Gao et al. further discloses transmitting a CSI report that includes CSI that is in accordance with the sub-configuration (See paragraph 171 and Figure 5 of Gao et al. for reference to the UE reporting computed CSI information to the network node based on the configuration). With respect to claims 11 and 28, Gao et al. discloses an apparatus for wireless communication, comprising: one or more memories; and one or more processors coupled to the one or more memories, the one or more processors individually or collectively configured to perform a method of wireless communication as a network node (See the abstract, paragraph 262, paragraphs 265-268, and Figure 11 of Gao et al. for reference to a network node comprising a memory coupled to processing circuitry executing instructions to perform a method of wireless communication). Gao et al. also discloses transmitting a channel state information (CSI) report configuration that indicates a CSI reference signal (CSI-RS) resource set for channel measurement (See paragraph 153 and Figure 5 of Gao et al. for reference to network node transmitting a configuration to a UE comprising a set of N CSI-RS resources for channel measurement). Gao et al. further discloses wherein the CSI-RS resource set is associated with a first one or more CSI-RS resources included in a first resource group and a second one or more CSI-RS resources included in a second resource group (See paragraph 155 of Gao et al. for reference to the configuration indicating a first subset of CSI-RS ports referred to as a first CSI-RS port group, which is a first resource group, and indicating a second subset of ports referred to as a second CSI-RS port group, which is a second resource group). Gao et al. also discloses wherein the CSI report configuration further indicates a sub-configuration indicating at least one of: first configuration information for the first resource group and second configuration information for the second resource group, or third configuration information associated with one or more pairs of resources from the first resource group and the second resource group (See paragraphs 155-156 of Gao et al. for reference to embodiments of the configuration wherein different parameter combinations may be configured for different CSI-RS resources, i.e. different parameter combinations configured for different CSI-RS groups, which equates to the claimed first configuration information and second configuration information). Gao et al. further discloses receiving a CSI report that includes CSI that is in accordance with the sub-configuration (See paragraph 171 and Figure 5 of Gao et al. for reference to the network node receiving from the UE reported computed CSI information based on the configuration). With respect to claims 2, 12, and 29, Gao et al. discloses wherein the sub-configuration indicates fourth configuration information that is common for both the first resource group and the second resource group (See paragraph 156 of Gao et al. for reference to embodiments wherein a same parameter combination may be applied to all the CSI-RS resources). With respect to claims 3 and 13, Gao et al. discloses wherein the fourth configuration information indicates at least one of: a common CSI-RS port configuration, a common CSI-RS port subset indication, a common codebook subset restriction, or a common rank restriction for CSI computation using a single CSI-RS resource from the first resource group or the second resource group (See paragraphs 15-21 and paragraphs 155-156 of Gao et al. for reference to the parameters including CSI-RS ports, subsets of CSI-RS ports, and codebook subset restriction). With respect to claims 4 and 14, Gao et al. discloses wherein the first configuration information indicates a first codebook subset restriction and the second configuration information indicates a second codebook subset restriction (See paragraphs 15-21 and paragraphs 155-156 of Gao et al. for reference to the embodiment wherein different parameter combinations are configured for different CSI-RS resources, such that the first CSI-RS group and the second CSI-RS group may be configured with different codebook subset restrictions). With respect to claims 6, 16, and 30, Gao et al. discloses wherein the first configuration information indicates a first CSI-RS port configuration and the second configuration information indicates a second CSI-RS port configuration (See paragraphs 155-156 of Gao et al. for reference to the embodiment wherein different parameter combinations are configured for different CSI-RS resources, such that the first CSI-RS group and the second CSI-RS group may be configured with different port configurations). With respect to claims 7 and 17, Gao et al. discloses wherein the first configuration information indicates a first CSI-RS port subset indication and the second configuration information indicates a second CSI-RS port subset indication (See paragraphs 155-156 of Gao et al. for reference to the embodiment wherein different parameter combinations are configured for different CSI-RS resources, such that the first CSI-RS group and the second CSI-RS group may be configured with different port subset configurations). With respect to claim 8, Gao et al. discloses wherein the first configuration information indicates a first rank restriction and the second configuration information indicates a second rank restriction (See paragraphs 155-156 of Gao et al. for reference to the embodiment wherein different parameter combinations are configured for different CSI-RS resources, such that the first CSI-RS group and the second CSI-RS group may be configured with different given ranks, which are rank restrictions). With respect to claim 10, Gao et al. discloses wherein the CSI-RS resource set is associated with one or more CSI-RS resources for interference measurement, and wherein the one or more CSI-RS resources for interference measurement are applicable to the sub-configuration (See paragraphs 12-13 and paragraphs 155-156 for reference to the CSI-RS resources being used to measure interference and for reference to the N CSI-RS resources being applicable to a first CSI-RS port group and a second CSI-RS port group, which comprise the first configuration information and second configuration information of the claimed sub-configuration). With respect to claim 19, Gao et al. discloses wherein the first resource group is associated with a first transmission reception point (TRP) and the second resource group is associated with a second TRP (See paragraph 155 of Gao et al. for reference to the first CSI-RS port group being associated with a first TRP and the second CSI-RS port group being associated with a second TRP). With respect to claim 20, Gao et al. discloses wherein the sub-configuration indicates: a first one or more identifiers corresponding to the first one or more CSI-RS resources, and a second one or more identifiers corresponding to the second one or more CSI-RS resources (See paragraphs 145-146 and paragraph 155 of Gao et al. for reference to the CSI-RS resources being indexed using resource indexes, which are identifiers, and for reference to the CSI-RS resources being grouped in first and second groups). With respect to claim 23, Gao et al. discloses wherein the CSI report configuration indicates the first resource group and the second resource group, and wherein the sub-configuration indicates: a first one or more identifiers corresponding to at least one CSI-RS resource included in the first resource group, and a second one or more identifiers corresponding to at least one CSI-RS resource included in the second resource group (See paragraphs 145-146 and paragraph 155 of Gao et al. for reference to the CSI-RS resources being indexed using resource indexes, which are identifiers, and for reference to the CSI-RS resources being grouped in first and second groups). With respect to claim 26, Gao et al. discloses wherein the CSI-RS resource set indicates a first CSI-RS port configuration, and wherein the sub-configuration is associated with a second one or more CSI-RS port configurations (See paragraph 155 of Gao et al. for reference to the configuration indicating first and second CSI-RS port groups). With respect to claim 27, Gao et al. discloses wherein the CSI-RS resource set indicates CSI-RS port configuration that is applicable to the sub-configuration (See paragraphs 153-155 of Gao et al. for reference to the configuration indicating N CSI-RS resources that are applicable to the first and second groups). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 5, 9, 15, 21-22, and 24-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gao et al. in view of Jeon et al. (U.S. Publication US 2025/0038810 A1). With respect to claims 5 and 15, Gao et al. does not specifically disclose wherein the third configuration information indicates rank restrictions for respective pairs of resources of the one or more pairs of resources. However, Jeon et al., in the field of communications, discloses configuring CSI-RS reporting for two resource groups and N resource pairs of CSI-RS resources with each pair having resources corresponding to different TRPs (See paragraph 136, paragraph 244, paragraph 265, and Figure 21 of Jeon et al.), wherein the CSI-RS resources may be configured with a rank restriction (See paragraph 166 of Jeon et al.). Configuring CSI-RS resources in pairs of CSI-RS resources from different TRPs with a rank restriction has the advantage of allowing a UE to measure CSI for non-coherent joint transmission by the two TRPs (See paragraph 265 of Jeon et al. for reference to this advantage). Thus, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing, when presented with the work of Jeon et al. to combine configuring CSI-RS resources in pairs of CSI-RS resources from different TRPs with a rank restriction, as suggested by Jeon et al., within the system and method of Gao et al., with the motivation being to allow a UE to measure CSI for non-coherent joint transmission by the two TRPs. With respect to claim 9, Gao et al. discloses wherein the first configuration information indicates a first one or more parameters applicable to the first CSI-RS resource, and wherein the second configuration information indicates a second one or more parameters applicable to the second CSI-RS resource (See paragraphs 155-156 of Gao et al. for reference to the embodiment wherein different parameter combinations are configured for different CSI-RS resources, such that the first CSI-RS group and the second CSI-RS group may be configured with parameter combinations). Gao et al. does not specifically disclose wherein a pair of resources, of the one or more pairs of resources, includes a first CSI-RS resource included in the first resource group and a second CSI-RS resource included in the second resource group. However, Jeon et al., in the field of communications, discloses configuring CSI-RS reporting for two resource groups and N resource pairs of CSI-RS resources with each pair having resources corresponding to different TRPs (See paragraph 136, paragraph 244, paragraph 265, and Figure 21 of Jeon et al.), wherein the CSI-RS resources may be configured with a rank restriction (See paragraph 166 of Jeon et al.). Configuring CSI-RS resources in pairs of CSI-RS resources from different TRPs with a rank restriction has the advantage of allowing a UE to measure CSI for non-coherent joint transmission by the two TRPs (See paragraph 265 of Jeon et al. for reference to this advantage). Thus, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing, when presented with the work of Jeon et al. to combine configuring CSI-RS resources in pairs of CSI-RS resources from different TRPs with a rank restriction, as suggested by Jeon et al., within the system and method of Gao et al., with the motivation being to allow a UE to measure CSI for non-coherent joint transmission by the two TRPs. With respect to claim 21, Gao et al. does not specifically disclose wherein the sub-configuration indicates the one or more pairs of resources, wherein each pair of resources, of the one or more pairs of resources, includes two resources from different resource groups of the first resource group and the second resource group. With respect to claim 22, although Gao et al. does disclose configuring CSI-RS resources with a given rank, which is a type of rank restriction (See paragraphs 156-158 of Gao et al.), Gao et al. does not specifically disclose the third configuration information indicates a rank restriction associated with CSI computations using the one or more pairs of resources. With further respect to claims 21-22, Jeon et al., in the field of communications, discloses configuring CSI-RS reporting for two resource groups and N resource pairs of CSI-RS resources with each pair having resources corresponding to different TRPs (See paragraph 136, paragraph 244, paragraph 265, and Figure 21 of Jeon et al.), wherein the CSI-RS resources may be configured with a rank restriction (See paragraph 166 of Jeon et al.). Configuring CSI-RS resources in pairs of CSI-RS resources from different TRPs with a rank restriction has the advantage of allowing a UE to measure CSI for non-coherent joint transmission by the two TRPs (See paragraph 265 of Jeon et al. for reference to this advantage). Thus, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing, when presented with the work of Jeon et al. to combine configuring CSI-RS resources in pairs of CSI-RS resources from different TRPs with a rank restriction, as suggested by Jeon et al., within the system and method of Gao et al., with the motivation being to allow a UE to measure CSI for non-coherent joint transmission by the two TRPs. With respect to claim 24, Gao et al. does not specifically disclose wherein the sub-configuration indicates the one or more pairs of resources, wherein each pair of resources, of the one or more pairs of resources, includes two resources from different resource groups from the at least one CSI-RS resource included in the first resource group and the at least one CSI-RS resource included in the second resource group. With respect to claim 25, although Gao et al. does disclose configuring CSI-RS resources with a given rank, which is a type of rank restriction (See paragraphs 156-158 of Gao et al.), Gao et al. does not specifically disclose wherein the third configuration information indicates a rank restriction associated with CSI computations using the one or more pairs of resources. With further respect to claims 24-25, Jeon et al., in the field of communications, discloses configuring CSI-RS reporting for two resource groups and N resource pairs of CSI-RS resources with each pair having resources corresponding to different TRPs (See paragraph 136, paragraph 244, paragraph 265, and Figure 21 of Jeon et al.), wherein the CSI-RS resources may be configured with a rank restriction (See paragraph 166 of Jeon et al.). Configuring CSI-RS resources in pairs of CSI-RS resources from different TRPs with a rank restriction has the advantage of allowing a UE to measure CSI for non-coherent joint transmission by the two TRPs (See paragraph 265 of Jeon et al. for reference to this advantage). Thus, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing, when presented with the work of Jeon et al. to combine configuring CSI-RS resources in pairs of CSI-RS resources from different TRPs with a rank restriction, as suggested by Jeon et al., within the system and method of Gao et al., with the motivation being to allow a UE to measure CSI for non-coherent joint transmission by the two TRPs. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Khan Beigi et al. (U.S. Publication US 2024/0072865 A1) and Yuan et al. (U.S. Publication US 2024/0030985 A1) each disclose relevant systems and methods of CSI-RS resource configuration. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jason E Mattis whose telephone number is (571)272-3154. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:00am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Huy Vu can be reached at 571-2723155. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON E MATTIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2461
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 06, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 23, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 02, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 02, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604311
SCHEDULING METHOD, BASE STATION AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604321
CONTROL CHANNEL REPETITION MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603723
COMMUNICATION DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598512
ANOMALY DETECTION IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598644
MULTIPLE STATION ACCESS IN A RESERVED TARGET-WAIT-TIME SERVICE PERIOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+17.6%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 875 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month