Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/482,590

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A BATTERY MANUFACTURING PROCESS HAVING INDUCTION HEATING AND CONVECTION COOLING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 06, 2023
Examiner
YOON, KEVIN E
Art Unit
1735
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Ford Motor Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
402 granted / 676 resolved
-5.5% vs TC avg
Strong +43% interview lift
Without
With
+43.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
711
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
86.1%
+46.1% vs TC avg
§102
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 676 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yokoyama et al. (US 2017/0203377 A1, hereinafter Yokoyama). Re Claim 1. Yokoyama teaches a system (Fig. 1) for a battery manufacturing process (intended use), comprising: a housing (item 4) defining a chamber (inside of item 4) adapted to receive an electrode substrate (functional limitation); a vacuum system (item 11) fluidly coupled to the housing (Fig. 1) and operable to remove particles in the chamber via suction (functional limitation); an induction dry-cool system (items 2 & 3) including one or more coils (items 2a & 3a) provided in the chamber, wherein the one or more coils are operable to heat the electrode substrate via induction during a dry operation and to reduce temperature of the electrode substrate during a cooling operation (functional limitation); and a control system (item 6) configured to control the vacuum system and the induction dry-cool system during the dry operation and the cooling operation (Fig. 1). Re Claim 2. Yokoyama teaches wherein, for the dry operation, the control system is configured to: control power to the one or more coils until a desired thermal profile is obtained for the electrode substrate, and activate the vacuum system to induce suction in the chamber (para. 73 & 74). Re Claim 3. Yokoyama teaches wherein: the one or more coils define an internal fluid path (item 3a) ; and during at least a portion of the dry operation, the control system is configured to circulate coolant through the internal fluid path to control a temperature of the one or more coils (para. 73 & 74). Re Claim 4. Yokoyama teaches wherein: the one or more coils define an internal fluid path (item 3a), for the cooling operation, the control system is configured to stop power to the one or more coils, and during at least a portion of the cooling operation, the control system is configured to circulate coolant through the internal fluid path (para. 73 & 74). Re Claim 5. Yokoyama teaches wherein the one or more coils (item 2a) are adapted to be in a non-contact proximity to the electrode substrate (Fig. 1) to induce current at the electrode substrate during the dry operation (functional limitation). Re Claim 6. Yokoyama teaches wherein: the one or more coils (item 3a) defines an internal fluid path, during at least a portion of the dry operation, the control system is configured to circulate coolant through the internal fluid path to control temperature of the one or more coils, for the cooling operation, the control system is configured to stop power to the one or more coils, and during at least a portion of the cooling operation, the control system is configured to circulate coolant through the internal fluid path to reduce the temperature of the electrode substrate (para. 73 & 74). Re Claim 7. Yokoyama teaches further comprising: a cooling system (item 13) fluidly coupled to the housing to inject a cooling agent into the chamber, wherein the control system is configured to control the cooling system to inject the cooling agent into the chamber during the cooling operation (para. 73 & 74). Re Claim 8. Yokoyama teaches wherein the cooling agent is nitrogen (para. 72). Re Claim 9. See rejections of claims 1 and 2, in combination. Re Claims 10 and 11. See rejections of claims 3 and 5, respectively. Re Claim 12. See rejections of claims 1 and 6, in combination. Re Claims 13-15. See rejections of claims 6-8, respectively. Re Claim 16. See rejections of claims 1, 2 and 4, in combination. Re Claims 17-20. See rejections of claims 7, 8, 3, and 5, respectively. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892. The rejections above rely on the references for all the teachings expressed in the text of the references and/or one of ordinary skill in the art would have reasonably understood from the texts. Only specific portions of the texts have been pointed out to emphasize certain aspects of the prior art, however, each reference as a whole should be reviewed in responding to the rejection, since other sections of the same reference and/or various combinations of the cited references may be relied on in future rejections in view of amendments. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEVIN E YOON whose telephone number is (571)270-5932. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9 AM- 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Keith Walker can be reached at 571-272-3458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KEVIN E YOON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1735 6/1/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 06, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678854
SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING SET TEMPERATURE OF MOLTEN METAL
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668040
PACKAGING MATERIAL FOR POWER STORAGE DEVICE, METHOD OF PRODUCING SAME, AND POWER STORAGE DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671104
BATTERY PACK FOR A VEHICLE AND METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MAKING THE SAME
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665272
BATTERY
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665273
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACCELERATING THE INFILTRATION OF LIQUID ELECTROLYTE IN A BATTERY CELL
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+43.1%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 676 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month