Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/483,985

PROGRAM, METHOD AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 10, 2023
Examiner
ANGELES, JOSE
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Koiniwa Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
41%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 41% of resolved cases
41%
Career Allow Rate
7 granted / 17 resolved
-28.8% vs TC avg
Strong +71% interview lift
Without
With
+71.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
61
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
§103
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§102
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
§112
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 17 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s submission of a Response Applicant’s submission of a response was received on 11/20/2025. Presently, claims 1-10 are now pending. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on 11/20/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s representative asserts that the amended claims limitations are not met. However, the rejection of claims 1-10 is maintained as presented below. Moreover, in light of the amendments to the claims, new rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 103 have been presented, as discussed in detail below. Applicant’s representative alleges the following: In regards to Rejections Under 35 U.S.C. 103, applicant contends that the cited references fail to disclose the features recited in the amended claims. Regarding point (1), the examiner notes that these limitations are disclosed or taught in the prior art references. Applicant’s representative argues that the screen shot pictures set forth in the Office Action are too unclear to rely on as disclosing the claimed features. In response to the arguments above, the screenshots serve as a way to visualize the prior art since most of these features are inherently included in the game, and some other features were added later after patch 1.3.27, which released in August 1st, 2018. However, these features will be clarified in the rejection below and show a newly found prior art reference of Farm Together as evidenced by Farm Together Wiki (necessitated by applicant’s amendment) (See office action below). Regarding claims 9 and 10, since they recite similar features to claim 1, claims 9 and 10 and all dependent claims will be rejected as stated above. Therefore, the rejection is maintained as present below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Stardew Valley as evidenced by Stardew Valley Wiki (hereinafter Stardew) in view of Farm Together as evidenced by Farm Together Wiki (hereinafter Farm Wiki). Regarding claims 1, 9, and 10, Stardew discloses a non-transitory computer readable medium storing a game program to be executed by a computer including a processor (inherent because Stardew valley is played mainly on a computer, Nintendo Switch, PlayStation, Xbox, or mobile devices), the game program causing the processor to execute: presenting a game field of a first player (in Stardew valley a host player can inherently create a game field to share the space with other players and will be presented to the players, this multiplayer feature was introduced in patch 1.3.27 released in August 1st, 2018 as shown in the Figure below), PNG media_image1.png 465 1410 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 326 722 media_image2.png Greyscale to the first player; matching the first player and a plurality of second players from the first player (inherent to multiplayer mode to match with other players because coop matches players together; as shown above in the Multiplayer Section above), based on an input operation of the first player and an input operation of the plurality of second players (selecting Co-op from menu requires input from the host player to create the space as shown below in the “Creating a multiplayer world Section” and input from the other players is inherently needed to accept an invitation to the coop field or enter an invitation code); PNG media_image3.png 327 679 media_image3.png Greyscale and associating a shared game object shared by first player and the second players (in coop mode, players inherently share the farmland and everything that grows on it, the crops planted or animals would be the shared game object shared by the first player and second players; shown below in the Gameplay section), PNG media_image4.png 456 672 media_image4.png Greyscale respectively, with the plurality of second players matched with the first player, wherein the presenting comprises: arranging both a game object that only the first player can operate (in Stardew valley, the farmland and everything that grows is shared by all matched players, however, only the host player can inherently arrange certain game objects, such as buildings inside this shared space) and the shared game object (planting crops is considered arranging because you are placing crops in specific places in the field), and performing the presenting of the game field of the first player to the first player (this is all inherently presented to the first player and all the players in the shared farm). Stardew does not explicitly disclose that only the first player can operate the shared game object, but examiner notes only the host player is inherently able to arrange certain objects in the farm (such as buildings). Furthermore, Stardew does not explicitly disclose associated with a second player selected by the first player from among the shared game object respectively associated with the plurality of second players matched with the first player. However, Farm Wiki relates to another farming game that allows users to match together and the host of the farm can edit what permissions other players have on their farm, which relates to Stardew because they are both farm multiplayer games. Farm Wiki teaches only the first player can operate the shared game object (the host player can make sure that he sets permissions so that no one else can operate the crops; see Fig below); PNG media_image5.png 1116 1460 media_image5.png Greyscale The shared object associated with a second player selected by the first player from among the shared game object respectively associated with the plurality of second players matched with the first player (in the permissions, the host player can inherently choose what permission a player will have in their farm, it allows a selected player to arrange the shared game object by allowing a player to plant crops). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Stardew to implement the teachings of Farm Wiki for the benefit of allowing the host player to restrict actions of other users in the farm. Although the farm can be a shared space, this space is hosted by the first user and he needs to have full control of the space and what is being done in the space. Regarding claim 2, Stardew discloses wherein the shared game object is configured to enable the first player and the second players to acquire a different game object (this is just harvesting the crops or animals by any of the matched players and this is an inherent feature of Stardew valley; shown below in the Experience Section), PNG media_image6.png 307 667 media_image6.png Greyscale by establishment of a predetermined condition (the predetermined condition is the crop or animal being ready for harvest) in a state where the first and the second players are matched (between 1-4 players are inherently matched in coop mode), and the game program causes the processor to execute accepting an input operation for acquiring the different game object (left click or c can be used to plant or harvest in the farm, which serves to acquire the product of harvesting crops; as shown below in the Keyboard and Mouse Section). PNG media_image7.png 743 517 media_image7.png Greyscale Stardew does not explicitly disclose accepting an input operation for acquiring the different game object only from the first player or an input operation for acquiring the different game object only from the second players matched with the first player. However, Farm Wiki relates to another farming game that allows users to match together and the host of the farm can edit what permissions other players have on their farm, which relates to Stardew because they are both farm multiplayer games. Farm Wiki teaches accepting an input operation for acquiring the different game object only from the first player or an input operation for acquiring the different game object only from the second players matched with the first player (in the permissions, the host player can inherently choose what permission a player will have in their farm, it allows a selected player to arrange the shared game object by allowing a player to plant crops, here the host player can allow himself to be the only one to harvest the crops by editing the permissions). PNG media_image8.png 1312 1877 media_image8.png Greyscale Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Stardew to implement the teachings of Farm Wiki for the benefit of allowing the host player to restrict actions of other users in the farm. Although the farm can be a shared space, this space is hosted by the first user and he needs to have full control of the space and what is being done in the space. Regarding claim 3, Stardew discloses wherein the accepting comprises causing at least one of the first player and the second players matched with the first player to acquire the different game object even when both the first player and the second players matched with the first player do not perform the input operation for the acquisition (this is basically a functionality to harvest crops without input from any of the players and this can be done with the Auto-Grabber from Stardew Valley, which automatically harvests animals as shown below and this feature was added in patch 1.3.27 released in August 1st, 2018; see figures below). PNG media_image9.png 553 621 media_image9.png Greyscale PNG media_image1.png 465 1410 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 4, Stardew discloses wherein the accepting comprises causing the first player and the second players matched with the first player to acquire the different game object (the different game object would be the product of the crop being harvested and this is inherent because all matched players can use left click or c to place crops or harvest them; shown below in the Keyboard and Mouse Section). PNG media_image7.png 743 517 media_image7.png Greyscale Regarding claim 5, Stardew discloses wherein the game program causes the processor to execute: arranging a first game object (placing the crops is considered arranging) for which the input operation for acquiring the different game object is accepted only from the first player, in the game field; and changing a parameter of the first game object arranged in the game field based on the acceptance of the input operation for acquiring the different game object from the first player (inherent because game objects have multiple parameters, for example here the parameter of the crop can go from “planted” to “harvested” or “planted” to “acquired” after being acquired). Stardew does not explicitly disclose the input operation for acquiring the different game object is accepted only from the first player, in the game field, but examiner notes only the host player is inherently able to arrange certain objects in the farm (such as buildings). However, Farm Wiki relates to another farming game that allows users to match together and the host of the farm can edit what permissions other players have on their farm, which relates to Stardew because they are both farm multiplayer games. Farm Wiki teaches the input operation for acquiring the different game object is accepted only from the first player, in the game field (in the permissions, the host player can inherently choose what permission a player will have in their farm, it allows the host player to be the only one capable of planting and harvesting crops by restricting what other players can do). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Stardew to implement the teachings of Farm Wiki for the benefit of allowing the host player to restrict actions of other users in the farm. Although the farm can be a shared space, this space is hosted by the first user and he needs to have full control of the space and what is being done in the space. Regarding claim 6, Stardew discloses wherein the game program causes the processor to execute: displaying information of a plurality of other players matched with the first player (the friends tab, depending on what platform you are using will show information from the players matched with the host players. For example: steam friend list will be able to show the friends you have in coop of Stardew valley); accepting an operation of specifying any one of the plurality of other matched players, from the first player (host player can inherently open friend menu on steam and specify which player he wants to check for their information); and arranging, in the first game field, the shared game object associated with the specified player and the first player in response to acceptance of the operation of specifying (inherent to this game because planting the seeds is considered arranging and any of the players specified can plant seeds). Stardew does not explicitly disclose displaying information of a plurality of other players matched with the first player, on a screen on which game field is displayed to the first player. However, Farm Wiki relates to another farming game that allows users to match together and the host of the farm can edit what permissions other players have on their farm, which relates to Stardew because they are both farm multiplayer games. Farm Wiki teaches displaying information of a plurality of other players matched with the first player, on a screen on which game field is displayed to the first player (when you press ESC you can see more information about the other people on the farm, such as people’s name, etc.; See Controls in-game section below). PNG media_image8.png 1312 1877 media_image8.png Greyscale Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Stardew to implement the teachings of Farm Wiki for the benefit of allowing the host player to know the details of each player on their farm, and keep track of who they are and what they are doing. Regarding claim 7, Stardew discloses wherein the game program causes the processor to execute arranging, in the first field (planting crops is considered arranging), only the shared game object associated with the first player and the specified player, among shared game objects each associated with respective one of the plurality of other matched players (this is inherent because the specified player or specified players are the players chosen by the host player in the shared farm space and the only ones able to interact with harvesting the crops; shown below in the Multiplayer Section). PNG media_image2.png 326 722 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 8, Stardew discloses wherein an area for arranging the shared game object in the game field is fixed irrespective of which one of the plurality of other players matched is specified by the first player (an inherent feature of Stardew valley is that crops can’t be moved once planted, therefore the arranging of the shared object is fixed). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSE ANGELES whose telephone number is (703)756-5338. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dmitry Suhol can be reached at (571) 272-4430. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSE ANGELES/Examiner, Art Unit 3715 /DMITRY SUHOL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 10, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 20, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 09, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Mar 03, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 03, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12548464
TILE BASED LOGICAL TEACHING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12390314
TOOTH MODEL FOR TOOTH TREATMENT PRACTICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 19, 2025
Patent 12387620
Variable Force Keyboard
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 12, 2025
Patent 12345497
HIGH-PRESSURE AIR DRUM MAGAZINE FOR BELT FED WEAPON
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 01, 2025
Patent 12293677
AIRCRAFT COCKPIT TRAINING SIMULATOR AND ASSOCIATED METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted May 06, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
41%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+71.4%)
3y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 17 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month