Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/484,643

METHOD OF OPERATION FOR AN APPARATUS FOR LAYER-BY-LAYER MANUFACTURE OF 3D OBJECTS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 11, 2023
Priority
Oct 13, 2022 — GB 2215119.5
Examiner
LEE, EDMUND H
Art Unit
1744
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Stratasys, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
817 granted / 1174 resolved
+4.6% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1214
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
48.2%
+8.2% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1174 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 19-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 6/23/26. Applicant’s election without traverse of 1-18 in the reply filed on 6/23/26 is acknowledged. Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 is indefinite because it is unclear where the preamble ends and the body of the claim begins. A transition phrase is missing. The phrase “the dosed amount over the build area” (cl 1:19) is indefinite because it is unclear whether it relates to the heated dosed amount of step (c). if they are related, it should be clearly recited as such. Corrections are required. Claims 1-18 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: the prior art of record including the closest prior art JP2006053127 teaches the apparatus (JP2006053127: fig 2) including a build area arranged between a dosing device side and a receiving chamber side (JP2006053127: fig 2), a dosing device at the dosing device side configured to dose an amount of build material onto a work surface including the build area (JP2006053127: fig 2; left or right side of the build area), a receiving chamber configured to receive at least a portion of the dosed amount and to return the portion to the dosing device (JP2006053127: fig 2; left or right side of the build area), a build material distributor configured to transfer the dosed amount across the build area to form a layer and/or to push the portion of build material into the receiving chamber (JP2006053127: fig 2; roller), and one or more heat sources configured to heat particulate build material (JP2006053127: fig 2; radiating source 120); the method comprising a warm up phase followed by a build phase for one or more 3D objects (JP2006053127: fig 2; radiating source heats up the build material and a laser source heats up the build material to build up the product), the warm up phase and the build phase further comprising a cycle of the steps of: (a) dosing the amount of build material from the dosing device onto the work surface (JP2006053127: fig 2); (b) pushing at least a portion of the dosed amount across the build area from the dosing device side to the receiving chamber side of the build area and into the receiving chamber by passing the build material distributor over the build area (JP2006053127: fig 2); (c) heating the dosed amount, by operating the one or more heat sources, at one or both of steps (a) and (b) (JP2006053127: fig 2; the radiating source or the laser source heats up the build material); wherein the steps (a) to (c) are repeated until each phase is complete; wherein the build phase further comprises at step (b): forming a layer over the build area from a layer portion of the dosed amount while pushing the dosed amount over the build area (JP2006053127: fig 2; the roller pushes the build material across the build area to form the product), and at step (c) a step of selectively melting the build material within a layer-specific region defined within the build area by operating a fusing heat source of the one of the one or more heat sources (JP2006053127: fig 2; the laser source heats up the build material to form the product). However, JP2006053127 neither teaches nor renders obvious every claimed limitation including, over a given duration of time, an aggregate volume of the portions of build material pushed into the receiving chamber during the warm up phase is larger than an aggregate volume of the portions of build material pushed into the receiving chamber during the build phase. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following references teach powder bed forming: USPNs 5204055,5597589 (SLS),6007318 (recirculating powder), 7578958,9073260, 11485083 (preheating build material), 201700241418, and 20200164466 (vacuuming recycling); JP2008540173 (heated recoater); and JP2006053127. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDMUND H LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-1204. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 9AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xiao (Sam) Zhao can be reached at 571-270-5343. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. EHL /EDMUND H LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1744
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 11, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12766803
METHODS FOR MANUFACTURING CUSHIONING ELEMENTS FOR SPORTS APPAREL
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759204
MANUFACTURING METHOD OF HOUSING STRUCTURE OF ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759213
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SKIN APPLICATION OF A THERMOFORMABLE FILM TO A SUPPORT
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759333
MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR HOUSING
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12752467
INJECTION MOLDING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+17.4%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1174 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month