Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/485,010

SPIROCYCLIC IMIDAZOLIDINONES AND IMIDAZOLIDINEDIONES FOR TREATMENT OF LIGHT CHAIN AMYLOIDOSIS

Non-Final OA §102§DP
Filed
Oct 11, 2023
Examiner
YOUNGBLOOD, WILLIAM JUSTIN
Art Unit
1629
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Protego Biopharma Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
32 granted / 51 resolved
+2.7% vs TC avg
Strong +40% interview lift
Without
With
+39.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
86
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
§102
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
§112
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 51 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims Claims 1-33 are pending in the instant application and subject to examination herein. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 08/15/2024, 08/16/2024 and 08/19/2024 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claims 23-24 are objected to because of the following informalities: each of claims 23-24 contains a redundancy in the list of elements of the disclosed Markush group(s): claim 23 includes the element “imidazopyrazinyl” twice in the same Markush group listing, and claim 24 includes the element “imidazo[l,5-a]pyrazin-8-yl” twice in the same Markush group listing. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 5, 13, 30 and 32 are anticipated by Kelly. Claims 1, 5, 13, 30 and 32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kelly (WO 2020/205683 A1)1. Claim 1 is drawn to a genus of spirocyclic imidazolidinones bearing pendant aryl and/or heteroaryl rings with specific limitations on the groups linking the aryl/heteroaryl rings to the spirocyclic core, as shown in the table below. Kelly discloses a compound 1582 that anticipates the genus of instant formula I, as shown in the table below (page 41): Claim Number(s) of Instant Application Instant Application Kelly 1 PNG media_image1.png 154 390 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein: PNG media_image2.png 372 528 media_image2.png Greyscale Thus, claim 1 is anticipated by the disclosure of Kelly. Claims 5 and 13 further limit claim 1, each to a narrower genus of compounds that is met by the disclosure of Kelly’s compound 158. Claim 30 further limits claim 1 to a pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Kelly discloses a pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound disclosed therein in admixture with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier (paragraph [0060]). Claim 32 further limits claim 1 to a method of treating light chain amyloidosis in a subject, comprising administering to the subject a compound of claim 1. Kelly discloses a method of light chain amyloidosis in a patient, comprising administering to the patient an effective amount of any compound described therein (paragraph [0008]). Thus, claims 5, 13, 30 and 32 are anticipated by the disclosure of Kelly. Claims 1, 7-9, 15, 18-21, 25-26, 28 and 30-31 are anticipated by Quattropani. Claims 1, 7-9, 15, 18-21, 25-26, 28 and 30-31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Quattropani (WO 2020/039029 A1)3. The limitations of claims 1 and 30 are discussed in the rejection above and hereby incorporated into the instant rejection. Quattropani discloses multiple compounds that anticipate the genus of claim 1, including for example Quattropani’s compounds IA34, 325 and 406 as shown in the table below (pages 17, 44 and 47, respectively): Claim Number(s) of Instant Application Instant Application Quattropani 1 PNG media_image1.png 154 390 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein: PNG media_image3.png 210 352 media_image3.png Greyscale Compound IA3 1 PNG media_image1.png 154 390 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein: PNG media_image4.png 146 266 media_image4.png Greyscale Compound 32 1 PNG media_image1.png 154 390 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein: PNG media_image5.png 290 422 media_image5.png Greyscale Compound 40 Thus, claim 1 is anticipated by the disclosure of Quattropani. Claim 7 further limits claim 1 to wherein R1 is selected from a Markush group that includes pyridiyl, pyrimidinyl and phenyl, optionally substituted with methyl and/or cyano group(s), and is met by compounds 32 and 40 disclosed by Quattropani. Claim 8 further limits claim 1 to wherein R1 is selected from a Markush group that includes pyrimidinyl, and is met by compound 40 disclosed by Quattropani. Claim 9 further limits claim 1 to wherein R1 is selected from a Markush group that includes 4-cyanophenyl, and is met by compound 32 disclosed by Quattropani. Thus, claims 7-9 are anticipated by the disclosure of Quattropani. Claim 15 is drawn to a genus of spirocyclic imidazolidinediones bearing pendant aryl and/or heteroaryl rings with specific limitations on the groups linking the aryl/heteroaryl rings to the spirocyclic core, as shown in the table below. Quattropani discloses multiple compounds that anticipate the genus of claim 15, for example Quattropani’s compounds IA17, 58 and 139, shown in the table below (pages 17, 35 and 38, respectively): Claim Number(s) of Instant Application Instant Application Quattropani 15 PNG media_image6.png 156 478 media_image6.png Greyscale wherein: PNG media_image7.png 164 392 media_image7.png Greyscale Compound IA1 15 PNG media_image6.png 156 478 media_image6.png Greyscale wherein: PNG media_image8.png 332 586 media_image8.png Greyscale Compound 5 15 PNG media_image6.png 156 478 media_image6.png Greyscale wherein: PNG media_image9.png 230 482 media_image9.png Greyscale Compound 13 Thus, claim 15 is anticipated by the disclosure of Quattropani. Claim 18 and 28 further limit claim 15, each to a narrower genus of compounds that is met by Quattropani’s compound IA1. Claims 19 and 26 further limit claim 15, each to a narrower genus of compounds that is met by Quattropani’s compounds IA1, 5 and 13. Claim 21 further limits claim 15 to a narrower genus of compounds that is met by Quattropani’s compound 13. Claim 25 further limit claim 15, each to a narrower genus of compounds that is met by Quattropani’s compounds IA1 and 5. Claim 26 further limits claim 15 to a narrower genus of compounds that is met by Quattropani’s compounds 5 and 13. Claim 30 further limits claim 1 to a pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Claim 31 further limits claim 15 to a pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of claim 15 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Quattropani discloses that the invention disclosed therein relates to a pharmaceutical composition comprising as active ingredient an effective amount of at least one compound disclosed therein according to the invention and/or physiologically acceptable salts thereof together with pharmaceutically tolerable adjuvants and/or excipients (page 93, lines 11-14). Thus, claims 18-19, 21, 25-26, 28 and 30-31 are anticipated by the disclosure of Quattropani. Claims 15, 17, 28 and 31 are anticipated by Cowley. Claims 15, 17, 28 and 31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Cowley (WO 2016/071293 A2)10. The limitations of claims 15, 28 and 31 are discussed in the rejection above and hereby incorporated into the instant rejection. Cowley discloses multiple compounds that anticipate the genus of instant formula II as claimed in claim 15, including for example Cowley’s compound 40711, shown in the table below (page 237): Claim Number(s) of Instant Application Instant Application Cowley 15 PNG media_image6.png 156 478 media_image6.png Greyscale wherein: PNG media_image10.png 174 136 media_image10.png Greyscale Thus, claim 15 is anticipated by the disclosure of Cowley. Claims 17 and 28 further limit claim 15, each to a narrower genus that is met by Cowley’s compound 407. Regarding claim 31, Cowley provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound disclosed therein and a pharmaceutically acceptable additive and/or excipient (pages 244-245, bridging paragraph). Thus, claims 17, 28 and 31 are anticipated by the disclosure of Cowley. Claims 15, 18-21 and 25-28 are anticipated by CAS 941970-37-2. Claims 15, 18-21 and 25-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CAS 941970-37-2 (Chemical Abstracts Services, registry number 941970-37-2, originally entered on 07/10/2007 by Life Chemicals, Inc.). The limitations of claims 15, 18-19, 21, 25-26 and 28 are discussed in the rejections above and hereby incorporated into the instant rejection. CAS 941970-37-2 discloses a compound12 that anticipates the genus of claim 15, as shown in the table below: Claim Number(s) of Instant Application Instant Application CAS 941970-37-2 15 PNG media_image6.png 156 478 media_image6.png Greyscale wherein: PNG media_image11.png 138 330 media_image11.png Greyscale Thus, claim 15 is anticipated by the disclosure of CAS 941970-37-2. Claims 18-21 and 25-28 further limit the genus of compounds of claim 15, each to a narrower genus, and each is met by the compound disclosed by CAS 941970-37-2. Thus, claims 18-21 and 25-28 are anticipated by the disclosure of CAS 941970-37-2. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. The limitations of claims 1 and 15 are discussed in the rejections above and hereby incorporated into the instant rejection below. Claims 1, 5, 10-11, 13, 15-17, 23-24, 26 and 28 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 64 and 130 of copending Application No. 18/494,587 (hereafter referred to as “Qiu”). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because Qiu’s claims 64 and 130 disclose compounds that anticipate the instant formulae I and II of instant claims 1 and 15, for examples Qiu’s compounds 213 and 2514, respectively, as shown in the table below: Claim Number(s) of Instant Application Instant Application Qiu 1 PNG media_image1.png 154 390 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein: PNG media_image12.png 274 230 media_image12.png Greyscale Compound 2 15 PNG media_image6.png 156 478 media_image6.png Greyscale wherein: PNG media_image13.png 260 244 media_image13.png Greyscale Compound 25 Instant claims 5, 10-11 and 13 further limit the genus of compounds of instant claim 1, each to a narrower genus that is anticipated by Qiu’s compound 2 of Qiu’s claim 64. Instant claims 16-17, 23-24, 26 and 28 further limit the genus of compounds of instant claim 15, each to a narrower genus that is anticipated by Qiu’s compound 25 of Qiu’s claim 130. This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection because the patentably indistinct claims have not in fact been patented. The limitations of claims 1 and 15 are discussed in the rejections above and hereby incorporated into the instant rejection below. Claims 1-3, 6, 10-11, 13, 15-17, 22-24, 26 and 28 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 43 and 86 of copending Application No. 18/494,601 (hereafter referred to as “Protego”). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because because Protego’s claims 43 and 86 disclose compounds that anticipate the instant formulae I and II of instant claims 1 and 15, for examples Protego’s compounds 315 and 2616, respectively, as shown in the table below: Claim Number(s) of Instant Application Instant Application Protego 1 PNG media_image1.png 154 390 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein: PNG media_image14.png 680 380 media_image14.png Greyscale Compound 3 15 PNG media_image6.png 156 478 media_image6.png Greyscale wherein: PNG media_image15.png 628 336 media_image15.png Greyscale Compound 26 Claims 2-3, 6, 10-11 and 13 further limit the genus of compounds of claim 1, each to a narrower genus that is met by Protego’s compound 3. Claims 16-17, 22-24, 26 and 28 further limit the genus of compounds of claim 15, each to a narrower genus that is met by Protego’s compound 26. This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection because the patentably indistinct claims have not in fact been patented. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 12, 14, 29 and 33 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to W. JUSTIN YOUNGBLOOD whose telephone number is (703)756-5979. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday from 8am to 5pm. The examiner can also be reached on alternate Fridays. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey S. Lundgren, can be reached at telephone number (571) 272-5541. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center to authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to the USPTO patent electronic filing system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via a variety of formats. See MPEP § 713.01. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/InterviewPractice. /W.J.Y./Examiner, Art Unit 1629 /JEFFREY S LUNDGREN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1629 1 Cited in Applicant’s Information Disclosure Statement dated 08/15/2024. 2 3-{2-[7-(diethylamino)-4-methyl-2-oxo-2H-chromen-3-yl]ethyl}-8-phenyl-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decan-2-one 3 Cited in Applicant’s Information Disclosure Statement dated 08/15/2024. 4 N-[5-({3-[(6-methylpyridin-3-yl)methyl]-2-oxo-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decan- 8-yl}methyl)-1,3-thiazol-2-yl]acetamide 5 4-({8-[1-(1,3-benzothiazol-5-yl)ethyl]-2-oxo-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decan-3-yl}methyl)benzonitrile 6 8-[1-(1,3-benzothiazol-5-yl)ethyl]-3-[(pyrimidin-2-yl)methyl]-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decan-2-one 7 N-{5-[(2,4-dioxo-3-{[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3-yl]methyl}-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decan-8-yl)methyl]-1,3-thiazol-2-yl}acetamide 8 8-[1-(1,3-benzothiazol-5-yl)ethyl]-3-[(pyrimidin-5-yl)methyl]-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decane-2,4-dione 9 4-({8-[1-(1,3-benzothiazol-5-yl)ethyl]-2,4-dioxo-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decan-3-yl}methyl)benzonitrile 10 Cited in Applicant’s Information Disclosure Statement dated 08/15/2024. 11 8-(6-chloro-1H-indazol-4-yl)-3-[(1,3-oxazol-2-yl)methyl]-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decane-2,4-dione 12 2,4-Dioxo-N-(2-phenylethyl)-8-(phenylmethyl)-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decane-3-acetamide 13 3-(2-{4-[(3S)-3-ethyl-3-phenylpyrrolidin-1-yl]-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridin-1-yl}ethyl)-8-{imidazo[1,5-a]pyrazin-8-yl}-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decan-2-one 14 8-{imidazo[1,5-a]pyrazin-8-yl}-3-(2-{6-methyl-4-[(3R)-3-methyl-3-phenylpyrrolidin-1-yl]-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridin-1-yl}ethyl)-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decane-2,4-dione 15 N-[2-(8-{imidazo[1,5-a]pyrazin-8-yl}-2-oxo-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decan-3-yl)ethyl]-3-methyl-5-[(3R)-3-methyl-3-phenylpyrrolidin-1-yl]pyridine-2-carboxamide 16 3-{2-[3-methyl-5-(3-methyl-3-phenylpyrrolidin-1-yl)pyridin-2-yl]ethyl}-8-(pyrimidin-2-yl)-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decane-2,4-dione
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 11, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600734
PHOTOSENSITIZING DYE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594277
MACROCYCLIC ULK1/2 INHIBITORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583848
ISOXAZOLE-3-CARBOXAMIDE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE FOR TREATMENT OF DISEASES CAUSED BY VIRUS INFECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583834
METHOD OF TREATING BACTERIAL INFECTIONS AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION FOR TREATING BACTERIAL INFECTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569493
Treatment of Chemosensory Dysfunction from a Coronavirus Infection
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+39.6%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 51 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month