Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/485,097

MULTI-PRIMARY CHANNEL ACCESS OPERATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 11, 2023
Examiner
DANIEL JR, WILLIE J
Art Unit
2465
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allowance Rate
440 granted / 723 resolved
+2.9% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
756
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
69.6%
+29.6% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 723 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This action is in response to applicant’s amendment filed on 29 December 2025. Claims 1-30 are now pending in the present application. This office action is made Final. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement(s) (IDS) submitted on 10 January 2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97 and is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lu et al. (hereinafter Lu) (US 2024/0179739 A1) in view of further support by Ahn et al. (US 2017/0338935 A1; hereinafter Ahn; also, see ). Regarding claims 1, 16, 27, and 29, Lu discloses a first wireless device (e.g., 600, 1000, STA) { (see pg. 6, [0290, 0276-0277]; Figs. 30-34) }, comprising: a processing system (e.g., 620, 1010) that includes processor circuitry and memory circuitry (e.g., 1020) that stores code, the processing system configured to cause the first wireless device (e.g., 600, 1000) to { (see pg. 6, [0290, 0276-0277]; Figs. 30-34) }: receive a first signaling indicating a first reservation of a first transmission opportunity for a second wireless device (e.g., 600, 1000; STA) on a first primary channel (e.g., primary link) of a first bandwidth, the first bandwidth comprising a first plurality of channels that are reservable via the first primary channel (e.g., primary link), the first signaling indicating an ending time of the first reservation { (see pg. 4, [0073-0074]; Figs. 2-4 & 30-34), where the system provides communication with a primary link }; and transmit or receive, via a second primary channel, a second signaling indicating a second reservation of a second transmission opportunity (e.g., TXOP), wherein an ending time of the second transmission opportunity occurs prior to the ending time of the first reservation and prior to a start of a transition delay associated with a transition delay associated with a transition between the first primary channel and the second primary channel for a communication event scheduled on one of the first plurality of channels or on one of a second plurality of channels of a second bandwidth { (see pg. 4, [0073-0074, 0077-0085]; Figs. 2-4 & 30-34), where the system provides communication with a secondary link }. Lu inexplicitly discloses having the feature(s) of a transition between the first primary channel and the second primary channel for a communication event. However, in the alternative, the examiner maintains that the feature(s) a transition between the first primary channel and the second primary channel for a communication event was well known in the art, as taught by Ahn. As further alternative support in the same field of endeavor, Ahn discloses the feature(s) a transition (e.g., switching) between the first primary channel (e.g., basic primary channel) and the second primary channel (e.g., alternative primary channel) for a communication event { (see pg. 3, [0038]; pg. 17, [0192]; pg. 2, [0013]; Figs. 8, 24-27, & 31-35), where the system provides a switching between basic primary channel and alternative primary channel }. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to combine the teachings of Lu as further alternatively supported by Ahn to have the feature(s) a transition between the first primary channel and the second primary channel for a communication event, in order to provide methods to increase a data transmission speed of the terminal, as taught by Ahn (see pg. 4, [0054]). Regarding claims 2, 17, and 30, the combination of Lu and Ahn discloses every limitation claimed, as applied above (see claim 1), in addition Lu further discloses the first wireless device of claim 1, wherein the processing system is further configured to cause the first wireless device to: transmit or receive one or more packets, during the second transmission opportunity, prior to the ending time of the second transmission opportunity in accordance with the second signaling { (see pg. 4, [0077-0085, 0073-0074,]; Figs. 2-4 & 30-34) }. Regarding claims 3 and 18, the combination of Lu and Ahn discloses every limitation claimed, as applied above (see claim 1), in addition Lu further discloses the first wireless device of claim 1, wherein: the transition delay is associated with switching from the second primary channel to the first primary channel, and the communication event is scheduled on one of the first plurality of channels { (see pg. 4, [0073-0074, 0077-0085]; Figs. 2-4 & 30-34) }. Regarding claims 4 and 19, the combination of Lu and Ahn discloses every limitation claimed, as applied above (see claim 1), in addition Lu further discloses the first wireless device of claim 1, wherein: the transition delay is associated with switching from the second primary channel to the first primary channel, and the communication event is scheduled on one of the second plurality of channels { (see pp. 9-10, [0177]; Figs. 2-4 & 30-34) }. Regarding claims 5 and 20, the combination of Lu and Ahn discloses every limitation claimed, as applied above (see claim 4), in addition Lu further discloses the first wireless device of claim 4, wherein the first plurality of channels and the second plurality of channels are associated with a non-simultaneous transmit and receive link pair, an enhanced multi-link single radio link set, or an enhanced multi-link multi radio link set { (see pp. 3-4, [0070, lines 12-16; 0071]; Figs. 2-4 & 30-34) }. Regarding claims 6 and 21, the combination of Lu and Ahn discloses every limitation claimed, as applied above (see claim 5), in addition Lu further discloses the first wireless device of claim 5, wherein the transition delay is associated with an enhanced multi-link single radio transition delay or an enhanced multi-link multi radio transition delay { (see pp. 9-10, [0177, 0185-0187]; Figs. 2-4 & 30-34) }. Regarding claims 7 and 22, the combination of Lu and Ahn discloses every limitation claimed, as applied above (see claim 4), in addition Lu further discloses the first wireless device of claim 4, wherein: the transition delay is indicated in one or more management frames { (see pp. 9-10, [0177, 0185-0187]; Figs. 2-4 & 30-34) }. Regarding claims 8 and 23, the combination of Lu and Ahn discloses every limitation claimed, as applied above (see claim 1), in addition Lu further discloses the first wireless device of claim 1, wherein the processing system is further configured to cause the first wireless device to: receive a third signaling indicating a third reservation of a third transmission opportunity, wherein a second communication event is scheduled to occur during the third transmission opportunity on one of the first plurality of channels or on one of the second plurality of channels; and transmit a response to the second signaling, wherein the response indicates a refusal to communicate during at least a portion of the third transmission opportunity { (see pg. 12, [0126]; pg. 4, [0073-0074, 0077-0085]; Figs. 2-4, 12, & 30-34) }. Regarding claims 9 and 24, the combination of Lu and Ahn discloses every limitation claimed, as applied above (see claim 1), in addition Lu further discloses the first wireless device of claim 1, wherein the processing system is further configured to cause the first wireless device to: receive, from the second wireless device or from a third wireless device, a third signaling indicating a third reservation of a third transmission opportunity, wherein a second communication event is scheduled to occur during the third transmission opportunity on one of the first plurality of channels or on one of the second plurality of channels; and transmit an instruction to the second wireless device or the third wireless device to refrain from transmitting during at least a portion of the third transmission opportunity { (see pg. 12, [0126]; pg. 4, [0073-0074, 0077-0085]; Figs. 2-4, 12, & 30-34) }. Regarding claims 10 and 25, the combination of Lu and Ahn discloses every limitation claimed, as applied above (see claim 1), in addition Lu further discloses the first wireless device of claim 1, wherein the processing system is further configured to cause the first wireless device to: receive a third signaling indicating a third reservation of a third transmission opportunity, wherein a second communication event is scheduled to occur during the third transmission opportunity on one of the first plurality of channels or on one of the second plurality of channels; and refrain from transmitting a response to the third signaling based at least in part on the second communication event being scheduled to occur during the third transmission opportunity { (see pg. 12, [0126]; pg. 4, [0073-0074, 0077-0085]; Figs. 2-4, 12, & 30-34) }. Regarding claim 11, the combination of Lu and Ahn discloses every limitation claimed, as applied above (see claim 10), in addition Lu further discloses the first wireless device of claim 10, wherein the second communication event is a dynamic event { (see pg. 4, [0073-0074, 0077-0085]; Figs. 2-4 & 30-34) }. Regarding claim 12, the combination of Lu and Ahn discloses every limitation claimed, as applied above (see claim 1), in addition Lu further discloses the first wireless device of claim 1, wherein: the transition delay is zero { (see pp. 9-10, [0185-0186]; pg. 5, [0107-0108]; Figs. 2-4 & 30-34) }. Regarding claim 13, the combination of Lu and Ahn discloses every limitation claimed, as applied above (see claim 1), in addition Lu further discloses the first wireless device of claim 1, wherein the communication event is a target beacon transmission beam scheduled on one of the first plurality of channels or one of the second plurality of channels, a target wake time service period scheduled on one of the first plurality of channels, or a target wake time service period scheduled on one of the second plurality of channels { (see pg. 4, [0073-0074, 0077-0085]; Figs. 2-4 & 30-34) }. Regarding claim 14, the combination of Lu and Ahn discloses every limitation claimed, as applied above (see claim 13), in addition Lu further discloses the first wireless device of claim 13, wherein the communication event is a restricted target wake time service period associated with the first primary channel that applies to the second primary channel or a coordinated restricted target wake time service period associated with the first primary channel that applies to the second primary channel { (see pg. 4, [0073-0074, 0077-0085]; Figs. 2-4 & 30-34) }. Regarding claim 15, the combination of Lu and Ahn discloses every limitation claimed, as applied above (see claim 13), in addition Lu further discloses the first wireless device of claim 13, wherein the communication event is a coordinated restricted target wake time service period associated with the first primary channel, and the processing system is further configured to cause the first wireless device to: transmit or receive a third signaling indicating whether the communication event applies to the second primary channel, a third primary channel of the second bandwidth, or any combination thereof { (see pg. 4, [0073-0074, 0077-0085]; Figs. 2-4 & 30-34) }. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 1-30 have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection necessitated by the amended language, new limitations, and/or new claims. In response to applicant’s arguments, the Examiner respectfully disagrees as the applied reference(s) provide more than adequate support and to further clarify (see the above claims for relevant citations and comments in this section). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Ahn et al. (US 2017/0188336 A1) discloses wireless communication method and wireless communication device for broadband link configuration. Naribole et al. (US 2021/0289499 A1) discloses shared transmission opportunity operation in multi-access point coordination. Naik et al. (US 2025/0126645 A1) discloses enabling coordinated multiple access on multiple primary channels. Fang et al. (US 2023/0061407 A1) discloses wideband channel access with multiple primary channels. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIE J DANIEL JR whose telephone number is (571)272-7907. The examiner can normally be reached on 9 - 6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gary Mui can be reached on 571-270-1420. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WILLIE J DANIEL JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2465 WJD,Jr 13 April 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 11, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 29, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 01, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 01, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672005
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLATFORM AND A METHOD OF MANAGING NETWORK LOAD
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666492
DRX OPERATION METHOD AND DEVICE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659096
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CONFIGURING 5G NEW RADIO UPLINK POSITIONING REFERENCE SIGNALS
4y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659084
TRANSIMISSION METHOD, APPARATUS AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659821
METHOD AND DEVICE WHICH MINIMIZE INTERRUPT DURING HANDOVER IN INTEGRATED ACCESS BACKHAUL SYSTEM AND WHICH ARE FOR FIRST CONNECTION IN MULTIPLE MOBILE TERMINALS
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+20.0%)
3y 10m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 723 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month