Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/485,731

Junction Box and Method For Manufacturing the Same

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 12, 2023
Examiner
LEON MUNOZ, EDWIN A
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Tyco Electronics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1323 granted / 1497 resolved
+20.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1526
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§102
46.3%
+6.3% vs TC avg
§112
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1497 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Claims 1-10 in the reply filed on November 3, 2025 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Liu et al. (CN113507804) in view of Zhou et al. (CN106653438). Regarding Claim 1, Liu discloses a junction box, comprising: a box body (21); a connector core (23) integrally with the box body; and a connector housing (213) embedded within the box body. Liu discloses substantially the claimed invention except for the connector core integrally molded with the box body. Zhou teaches the use of injection molding in a similar connector box (30) to manufacture a light guide post (320). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the junction box of Liu by using molding, as taught in Zhou, in order to allow production of identical junction boxes in a short time without increasing labor costs. Regarding Claim 2, Liu discloses a connector terminal (27) being arranged within a terminal hole (Fig. 3) defined in the connector core, the connector housing, the connector core and the connector terminal form a connector (Fig. 2) that is integral to the box body. Regarding Claims 3-9, Liu discloses a light guide post (281) being embedded (Fig. 5) within the box body, the box body defines a light guide post hole (282), the light guide post is inserted into the light guide post hole. Regarding Claim 10, Liu discloses a junction box, comprising: a box body (21); a connector core (23) integrally with the box body; a connector housing (213) embedded within the box body; and a light guide post (281) embedded (Fig. 5) within the box body. Liu discloses substantially the claimed invention except for the connector core integrally molded with the box body. Zhou teaches the use of injection molding in a similar connector box (30) to manufacture a light guide post (320). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the junction box of Liu by using molding, as taught in Zhou, in order to allow production of identical junction boxes in a short time without increasing labor costs. Regarding the method limitations (e.g. formed separately or during molding”), Applicant is remined that the claims are directed to the device. The method of forming the device is not germane to the issue of patentability of the device itself. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The cited prior art discloses junction boxes, similar to Applicant’s claimed invention, having connector cores, housings and light guide posts. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDWIN A LEON whose telephone number is (571)272-2008. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee S Luebke can be reached on 5712722009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EDWIN A. LEON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2833
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 12, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603238
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC TIMEPIECE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602011
TIMEPIECE COMPRISING AN EXTERNAL ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596334
CROWN FOR AN ELECTRONIC WATCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596331
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND WATCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591205
EXTERIOR MEMBER, CASE AND TIMEPIECE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+7.9%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1497 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month