Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/486,112

FIRE RISK DETECTION SYSTEM FOR AN AGRICULTURAL HARVESTER

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 12, 2023
Examiner
TC 3600, DOCKET
Art Unit
3600
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Cnh Industrial Belgium N V
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
4%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
To Grant
5%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 4% of cases
4%
Career Allow Rate
5 granted / 142 resolved
-48.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 1m
Avg Prosecution
206 currently pending
Career history
348
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
36.1%
-3.9% vs TC avg
§103
34.6%
-5.4% vs TC avg
§102
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
§112
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 142 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-20 are currently pending and have been examined in this application. This communication is the first action on the merits. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/12/2023 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation “a previously captured thermal image” (lines 17-19) in discussing a change in the shape of one or more areas in the thermal image has taken place. It is unclear whether the limitation “a previously captured thermal image” is the same as the one recited earlier in base claim 1 or a different previously captured thermal image. For examination purposes, the examiner has interpreted this to mean “the previously captured thermal image” of base claim 1. Claim 1 recites the limitation “the risk for fire” on line 24. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1 recites the limitation “the shape of one or more areas” on line 17. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 3 recites the limitations “the ambient temperature and/or humidity”, “the engine load”, “the type of crop”, “the crop humidity”, “the position of the sun”, and “the wind direction”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for these limitations in the claim. Claim 19 recites the limitation “the average and/or maximum temperature” on line 20. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 19 recites the limitation “the shape of one or more areas” on line 24. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter 11. Claim 2, 4-18 and 20 would be allowable if rewritten to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 3 is objected for its dependency on the rejected base claim, but would otherwise be allowable if rewritten to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art discloses a harvester fire alarm can warn and alarm when there is fire hazard to the agricultural harvester. However, the prior art does not explicitly disclose determine if the average and/or maximum temperature in one or more areas in the thermal image exceeds a threshold, determine if a change in the average and/or maximum temperature in one or more areas in the thermal image compared to a previously captured thermal image exceeds a threshold, determine whether a change in the shape of one or more areas in the thermal image has taken place compared to a previously captured thermal image and/or to a reference shape, and whether said change exceeds a threshold, a control unit coupled to the processing unit, and configured to execute one or more of the following actions when one or more thresholds are exceeded: give a visual and/or auditive warning signal to an operator of the agricultural harvester, modify a setting of the agricultural harvester to reduce the risk for fire and/or slow down or contain a fire, activate a fire extinguishing system in the agricultural harvester. Claims 1, 3 and 19 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112 set forth in this Office Action. The prior art discloses a harvester fire alarm can warn and alarm when there is fire hazard to the agricultural harvester. However, the prior art does not explicitly disclose determine if the average and/or maximum temperature in one or more areas in the thermal image exceeds a threshold, determine if a change in the average and/or maximum temperature in one or more areas in the thermal image compared to a previously captured thermal image exceeds a threshold, determine whether a change in the shape of one or more areas in the thermal image has taken place compared to a previously captured thermal image and/or to a reference shape, and whether said change exceeds a threshold, a control unit coupled to the processing unit, and configured to execute one or more of the following actions when one or more thresholds are exceeded: give a visual and/or auditive warning signal to an operator of the agricultural harvester, modify a setting of the agricultural harvester to reduce the risk for fire and/or slow down or contain a fire, activate a fire extinguishing system in the agricultural harvester. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VINCENT FENG whose telephone number is (703)756-4715. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00AM - 5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NAVID MEHDIZADEH can be reached on (571) 272-7691. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VINCENT FENG/Examiner, Art Unit 3669 /NAVID Z. MEHDIZADEH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3669
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 12, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 8813663
SEEDING MACHINE WITH SEED DELIVERY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 26, 2014
Patent null
Interconnection module of the ornamental electrical molding
Granted
Patent null
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENTITY SPECIFIC, DATA CAPTURE AND EXCHANGE OVER A NETWORK
Granted
Patent null
Systems and Methods for Performing Workflow
Granted
Patent null
DISTRIBUTED LEDGER PROTOCOL TO INCENTIVIZE TRANSACTIONAL AND NON-TRANSACTIONAL COMMERCE
Granted
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
4%
Grant Probability
5%
With Interview (+1.5%)
1y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 142 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month