Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/487,136

ULTRA-SHORT FOCUS PROJECTION LENS AND PROJECTION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 16, 2023
Priority
Oct 17, 2022 — CN 202211266587.1
Examiner
CRUZ, MAGDA
Art Unit
2882
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Coretronic Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
756 granted / 868 resolved
+19.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
878
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
41.2%
+1.2% vs TC avg
§102
38.3%
-1.7% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 868 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1 and 18, a broad range or limitation together with a narrow range or limitation that falls within the broad range or limitation (in the same claim) may be considered indefinite if the resulting claim does not clearly set forth the metes and bounds of the patent protection desired. See MPEP § 2173.05(c). In the present instance, claims 1 and 18 recites the broad recitation “a plurality of lenses having diopters”, and the claim also recites “ten lenses having diopters in total” which is the narrower statement of the range/limitation. The claim(s) are considered indefinite because there is a question or doubt as to whether the feature introduced by such narrower language is (a) merely exemplary of the remainder of the claim, and therefore not required, or (b) a required feature of the claims. Claims 2-17 and 19-20 fall with parent claim. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed on 07/29/2026 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Yin (CN 114296218 A) discloses a projection lens and projection system, comprising: a refractive system and a reflective system, the refractive system comprises: the front group lens group, middle group lens group and back group lens group, the back group lens group comprises two double-glued lens group and a three-cemented lens group; the reflecting system comprises a reflector, the reflector comprises a first surface close to the front group of lens and a second surface away from the front group of lens, the second surface is used for reflecting the imaging light of the refractive system. using two double-glued lens group and a three-cemented lens group to improve different wavelength difference generated, so that the projection lens spectrum covers the range of 450nm to 645nm. reflecting the light of the first wave band by using the first surface of the reflector, transmitting the light of the second wave band, using the second surface to reflect the light of the second wave band. The aberration is further corrected by using the optical path difference generated between the two surface of the reflector to improve the image quality. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAGDA CRUZ whose telephone number is (571)272-2114. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday from 9:00 AM to 5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Toan Ton can be reached at 571-272-2303. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAGDA CRUZ/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2882 09/03/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 05, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 29, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748314
BEAM SPLITTER/COMBINER AND PROJECTION APPARATUS
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743012
WAVELENGTH CONVERTER, LIGHT SOURCE DEVICE, AND PROJECTOR
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736865
ILLUMINATION SYSTEM AND PROJECTION APPARATUS
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736860
REFLECTIVE DIFFUSION DEVICE AND PROJECTION DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736862
LIGHT SOURCE DEVICE AND PROJECTOR
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+9.7%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 868 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month