Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/487,766

BRAKE DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 16, 2023
Examiner
WILLIAMS, THOMAS J
Art Unit
3616
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
1090 granted / 1387 resolved
+26.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
1446
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§102
34.4%
-5.6% vs TC avg
§112
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1387 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-8 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2018/0298963 A1 to Demorais et al. Re-claim 1, Demorais et al. disclose a brake device comprising: a brake pad 7 with first and second side surfaces and a plurality of protrusions (see figure 3); a pad pusher 92 is connected to the brake pad and linearly moves the brake pad; a caliper body 6 has a cylinder space (see figures 16 and 17, the cylinder space is interpreted as up to recess 53), the pad pusher is seated in the cylinder space; a pad carrier is connected to the caliper body (see figure 20b) and guides the plurality of protrusions, the pad pusher includes: a bolt screw 27 rotates with respect to an axis within the cylinder space; a movable nut 28 is connected to the bolt screw; a piston (elements 5 and 18) is connected to an end of the movable nut, the movable nut 28 is configured to move in a moving direction corresponding to a longitudinal direction of the cylinder space when the bolt screw rotates, the piston has a cylindrical shape (part 18) and includes a front surface, a rear surface having an opening, and a piston cover 5 covering the front surface (see at least figure 10a). Re-claim 2, the movable nut 28 has a rotation-preventing protrusion (see figure 10b and anti-rotation features 41/42, see also paragraph 67 which describes various types of anti-rotation features that can be used) is disposed at the end of the movable nut and extends in a direction perpendicular to the moving direction of the movable nut (this can be one of splines, recesses, protrusions as disclosed), the piston includes a rotation-preventing groove disposed corresponding to the rotation-preventing protrusion, and the rotation-preventing protrusion is located within the rotation-preventing groove. The piston portion 5 will have corresponding anti-rotation features to fit the features of the nut. Re-claim 3, the brake pad 7 includes a pad connection protrusion (such as 75) extending perpendicular to a surface of a back plate 11, the piston includes a pad connection groove 76 disposed corresponding to the pad connection protrusion, and the pad connection protrusion is located within the pad connection groove. Re-claim 4, the rotation-preventing protrusion includes a plurality of rotation-preventing protrusions disposed outside the cylinder space at a regular spacing in a circumferential direction of the movable nut, and the rotation-preventing groove includes a plurality of rotation-preventing grooves corresponding respectively to the plurality of rotation-preventing protrusions. As shown in figure 17, the distal end of element 5 is outside the cylinder space, which is defined as stopping at recess 53. The anti-rotation features present between the nut 28 and the distal end of 5 will be outside the cylinder space. Re-claim 5, the pad connection groove includes a plurality of connection grooves 76 disposed at a regular spacing in a circumferential direction of the piston, and the pad connection protrusion includes a plurality of pad connection protrusions 75 respectively disposed corresponding to the plurality of pad connection grooves (see paragraph 45, note the plurality of protrusions that can be present). Re-claim 6, the movable nut includes a first groove extending on an outer surface of the end of the movable nut in the circumferential direction of the movable unit, the piston includes a second groove extending on an inner surface of the piston in a circumferential direction of the piston, and a seal is disposed at a space defined by the first groove and the second groove. Re-claim 7, the cylinder space includes a third groove 53 extending along an edge of an entrance of the cylinder space, the piston includes a fourth groove 54 extending along a circumference of an outer circumferential surface of the piston, and the pad pusher further includes a boot 52 having a first end located within the third groove and a second end located within the fourth groove. Re-claim 8, the piston cover 5 is adhered to the back plate 11 of the brake pad 7 (see also figure 4 and note connections 25). Re-claim 10, Demorais et al. disclose a brake device comprising: a brake pad 7 having first and second side surfaces and a plurality of protrusions extending from the first and second side surfaces (see figure 3); a pad pusher is connected to the brake pad and moves the brake pad; a caliper body 6 has a cylinder space, the pad pusher is seated at the cylinder space; a pad carrier (see figure 20b) is connected to the caliper body and configured to linearly guide the plurality of protrusions, the pad pusher includes: a bolt screw 27 rotates with respect to an axis within the cylinder space; a movable nut 28 is connected to the bolt screw; a piston 5/18 is connected to an end of the movable nut, the movable nut 28 is configured to move in a longitudinal direction of the cylinder space by rotation of the bolt screw, and wherein the piston is configured to prevent the rotation of the movable nut. The piston is non-rotationally connected to the brake pad, which is non-rotationally connected to the brake caliper by protrusions. The combination of features will restrain the piston from rotating, and as such the nut. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Demorais et al. in view of US 2022/0316539 A1 to Smith et al. Demorais et al. fail to teach the piston cover 5 (or footing) having a heat-insulating material. Smith et al. teach a piston structure having a cover 5 (i.e. footing) made from a plastic material (see paragraph 32). Plastics have heat-insulating properties, and would have reduced the overall weight of the piston. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have used for the material of the piston cover in Demorais et al. a plastic material as taught by Smith et al., thus reducing the overall weight of the piston as well as prevent the transmission of heat to the brake fluid. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Mitchell and Danne each teach a piston having a piston cover element. Michels teaches an anti-rotation feature outside a cylinder space. Akita, Qian, Ohtani, Satoh, Smith, Leiter and Jedele each teach a brake device having anti-rotation features. Any inquiries concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Thomas Williams whose telephone number is 571-272-7128. The examiner can normally be reached on Tuesday-Friday from 6:00 AM to 4:00 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Siconolfi, can be reached at 571-272-7124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application or proceeding should be directed to the receptionist whose telephone number is 571-272-6584. TJW /THOMAS J WILLIAMS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3616 January 30, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601388
TORQUE TRANSMISSION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595833
SHOCK ABSORBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594822
SUPER ELASTIC SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS BASED SOLID-STATE VIBRATION ISOLATION ELEMENTS FOR ELECTRIC DRIVETRAINS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595830
TORQUE PAD ATTACHMENT ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12571452
LIQUID-FILLED VIBRATION DAMPING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+13.5%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1387 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month