Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/487,954

ESM WITH REDUCED TORQUE RIPPLE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 16, 2023
Examiner
WON, BUMSUK
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Audi AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
274 granted / 446 resolved
-6.6% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
455
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
56.6%
+16.6% vs TC avg
§102
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§112
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 446 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of claims 1-7 and 10 in the reply filed on 8/20/2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that there is no undue burden if examination of the non-elected claims were required given the overlapping subject matter of the features of the embodiments recited in such claims with those of the elected subject matter. This is not found persuasive because although there is overlapping subject matter between groups, there are nonoverlapping subject matter exclusive from each group. Also, as noted in the previous office action, there would be serious search/examination burden if restriction were not required due to different field of search. Thus, the requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yoshikawa (US 20080203842). Regarding claim 1, Yoshikawa discloses a rotor 21, in figures 1 and 2, for an externally excited synchronous machine (paragraph 1), comprising: pole shoes 23 having an outer contour (lines between points X, A, B, C and Z) composed of straight line segments (lines XA, AB, BC and CZ), the ends of which are situated on a line corresponding to a sine field pole contour (figure 2, dotted line). Regarding claim 2, Yoshikawa discloses the outer contour of the pole shoes is mirror symmetrical (figure 2, centerline 27). Regarding claims 3-5, Yoshikawa discloses the outer contour of the pole shoes comprises 8 line segments (figure 2, 4 lines XA, AB, BC and CZ, mirror symmetrical at centerline 27; thus, total of 8 line segments per pole shoe). Regarding claim 10, Yoshikawa discloses an externally excited synchronous machine (paragraph 1), comprising: a rotor according to claim 1 (note rejection of claim 1 above). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoshikawa in view of Shrestha (US 20160211787). Regarding claim 6, Yoshikawa further discloses the rotor composed of individual sheet metal slats arranged congruently one on top of another (claim 1). Yoshikawa does not disclose a pole wheel with exciter windings. Shrestha discloses a rotor 104 (figure 1) with a pole wheel 106 with exciter windings 110, for the purpose of providing flexible, controllable, and robust rotor excitation, thereby improving reliability and adjustability. Thus, it would have been obvious to person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have a pole wheel with exciter windings disclosed by Shrestha in the rotor disclosed by Yoshikawa, for the purpose of providing flexible, controllable, and robust rotor excitation, thereby improving reliability and adjustability. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoshikawa in view of Shrestha, in further view Hunstable (US 20220045559). Regarding claim 7, Yoshikawa in view of Shrestha does not disclose the individual sheet metal slats are coated with an insulator. Hunstable discloses a motor including individual sheet metal slats are coated with an insulator (paragraphs 154 and 157), for the purpose of reducing eddy current and provide resistance to corrosion or rust. Thus, it would have been obvious to person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have the individual sheet metal slats are coated with an insulator as disclosed by Hunstable in the device disclosed by Yoshikawa in view of Shrestha, for the purpose of reducing eddy current and provide resistance to corrosion or rust. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Schmidt (US 20190020233) and, machine translations of Salzmann (WO 2012/119894), machine translations of Yao (CN 113394936), and machine translations of Merwerth (DE 10 2017 205 021). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BUMSUK WON whose telephone number is (571)272-2713. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 7 AM - 5 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allana L Bidder can be reached at (571) 272-5560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BUMSUK WON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12563898
DISPLAY PANEL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12557474
SILICON-BASED ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DISPLAY SUBSTRATE WITH OLED CATHODE INCLUDING CONDUCTIVE SCATTERING SUBSTRUCTURE, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF AND DISPLAY PANEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12557489
DISPLAY PANEL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12537508
ACOUSTIC WAVE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12538661
ELECTROLUMINESCENCE DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+23.7%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 446 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month