Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/488,218

VALVE SECTION AND HYDRAULIC SYSTEM WITH A VALVE SECTION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 17, 2023
Examiner
WILLIAMS, PATRICK C
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Hawe Hydraulik SE
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
408 granted / 509 resolved
+10.2% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
522
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
43.4%
+3.4% vs TC avg
§102
34.1%
-5.9% vs TC avg
§112
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 509 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species D (FIG 4) in the reply filed on 2/3/2026 is acknowledged. Accordingly, non-elected claims 11 and 13 are withdrawn from consideration. However, other claims are also found to be withdrawn, contrary to the applicant’s noted claims: Claim 18 recites “a bypass line, the bypass line connecting the first hydraulic port and/or the second hydraulic port to the collector channel, in particular to the return channel, via the spool and bypassing the outlet pressure compensator”, disclosed in paragraph 65 and as 62 in FIG 2. As it is absent in elected species FIG 4, claim 18 is withdrawn. Claim 19 recites “a first pilot-operated check valve opening in the direction of flow to the spool is disposed between the spool and the first hydraulic port, and a second pilot-operated check valve opening in the direction of flow to the spool is disposed between the spool and the second hydraulic port, wherein a pressure applied to the second hydraulic port unlocks the first check valve and a pressure applied to the first hydraulic port unlocks the second check valve” disclosed in paragraph 84 and as 66/68 in FIG 6. As it is absent in elected species FIG 4, claim 19 is withdrawn. Claim 22 recites “further comprising an intermediate section, the intermediate section comprising a filling line with a filling valve, the filling line connecting the pressure channel to the collector channel, wherein the intermediate section comprises a drain line with a drain valve, the drain line connecting the collector channel to the return channel”, disclosed in paragraph 67 and as 114,116,118,120 in FIG 2. As it is absent in elected species FIG 4, claim 22 is withdrawn. Claim 23 recites “a first connecting line for connecting the at least one hydraulic consumer to the first pressure port and a second connecting line for connecting the at least one hydraulic consumer to the second pressure port, wherein a first flow control valve or a first line break protection device is disposed in the first connecting line and wherein a second flow control valve or a second line break protection device is disposed in the second connection line, wherein the first flow control valve is preferably a first lowering brake valve, and wherein the second flow control valve is preferably a second lowering brake valve”, disclosed in paragraphs 83-84 and as 128, 130, 132, 134 in FIG 6. As it is absent in elected species FIG 4, claim 23 is withdrawn. Claim Objections Claims 20 is objected to because of the following informalities: there is insufficient antecedent basis for “the return channel”. Interpreted for examination as –the collector channel--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 9, 14-16, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by applicant’s cited DE 2015116761 A1, hereinafter Linde. Regarding claim 1, Linde (FIG 4) discloses “A valve section for a hydraulic system, the valve section comprising: at least a first hydraulic port (13) and a second hydraulic port (14) for supplying hydraulic fluid to at least one hydraulic consumer (15); a spool (10); a pressure channel (P1-P3); a collector channel (TL); an inlet pressure compensator (ZDW) disposed between the pressure channel and the spool (see FIG 4); and an outlet pressure compensator (ADW) disposed between the spool and the collector channel (see FIG 4), wherein the pressure channel is connectable to a pump (PUM; see FIG 1) of the hydraulic system, wherein the spool selectively connects the first hydraulic port to the pressure channel and the second hydraulic port to the collector channel (via 10b) or connects the first hydraulic port to the collector channel and the second hydraulic port to the pressure channel (via 10c), wherein the inlet pressure compensator (ZDW) and the outlet pressure compensator (ADW) are controllable via a signal pressure device (60, including dashed lines directly extending therefrom), and wherein an external additional force component dependent on an operating condition of the hydraulic system (pressures from 17, 19) acts on the signal pressure device at the first hydraulic port or at the second hydraulic port such that the inlet pressure compensator blocks the pressure channel (when pressure is higher from 19 than 17 [of which is connected to hydraulic ports 13/14 in various positions of 10], 60 moves to 60c, lowering the pressure that acts on the right side of ZDW, enabling ZDW to move to the right and close communication between P1-3 and 10).” Regarding claim 9, Linde (FIG 4) discloses “further comprising a return channel (37) connectable to a tank (TV) of the hydraulic system.” Regarding claim 14, Linde (FIG 4) discloses “wherein the collector channel (TL) is a return channel connectable to the tank (TV) of the hydraulic system (see FIG 1), wherein the valve section further comprises a suction arrangement (35/36, seen as “suction arrangement” as there is an incorporated check valve that opens to negative pressure relative to the consumer [i.e. pressure at 37/38 is higher than flow at 13/14]), the suction arrangement connecting the return channel to the first hydraulic port and the second hydraulic port (see FIG 4).” Regarding claim 15, Linde (FIG 4) discloses “further comprising a suction arrangement (35/36, seen as “suction arrangement” as there is an incorporated check valve that opens to negative pressure relative to the consumer [i.e. pressure at 37/38 is higher than flow at 13/14]), the suction arrangement connecting the collector channel (TL) to the first hydraulic port and the second hydraulic port (13, 14).” Regarding claim 16, Linde (FIG 4) discloses “wherein the suction arrangement comprises a first suction line (line to right of 35) with a first suction valve (35) and a second suction line (line to left of 36) with a second suction valve (36), wherein the first suction line opens between the spool and the first hydraulic port and wherein the second suction line opens between the spool and the second hydraulic port (see FIG 4).” Regarding claim 20, Linde (FIG 4) discloses “A hydraulic system comprising at least one valve section according to claim 1 (set forth above), a pump (PUM) and a tank (TV), wherein the pressure channel is connected to the pump, and wherein the return channel is connected to the tank (see FIG 1).” Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-7, 10, 12, 17, and 21 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 2, Linde (FIG 4) discloses “wherein the signal pressure device comprises a first signal pressure line (17), wherein the first signal pressure line is connected to the first hydraulic port when the first hydraulic port (13) is connected to the collector channel (TL) via the spool (10c), and wherein the first signal pressure line (17) is connected to the second hydraulic port (14) when the second hydraulic port is connected to the collector channel via the spool (10b), and the signal pressure device comprises a second signal pressure line (19), wherein the second signal pressure line is connected to the first hydraulic port (13) when the second hydraulic port (14) is connected to the collector channel (TL) via the spool (10b), and wherein the second signal pressure line (19) is connected to the second hydraulic port (14) when the first hydraulic port is connected to the collector channel via the spool (10c)…” Linde is silent regarding “and the signal pressure device has a third signal pressure line, the third signal pressure line branching off between the inlet pressure compensator the spool, and the signal pressure device has a fourth signal pressure line, the fourth signal pressure line branching off between the spool and the outlet pressure compensator.” Modifying Linde in this manner is seen to be nonobvious as it would dramatically alter Linde’s intended operation. Claims 3-6 and 8 are allowable by virtue of their dependency on claim 2. Regarding claim 7, Linde is silent regarding “wherein the inlet pressure compensator (ZDW) has a first biasing element acting on the open-control side, and/or the outlet pressure compensator has a second biasing element acting on the open-control side.” Linde has springs in other embodiments, but FIG 4 instead uses line pressure feedback to balance the compensators ADW, ZDW. This is not seen to read on a “biasing element”, Modifying Linde in this manner is seen to be nonobvious as it would dramatically alter Linde’s intended operation. Regarding claim 10, Linde is silent regarding “further comprising a feed line, wherein the outlet pressure compensator is configured as a 3/3-way pressure compensator and is connected on the inlet side to the spool and on the outlet side to the feed line and the return channel, the feed line opening into the collector channel.” In Linde the outlet compensator ADW has 4 positions. Modifying Linde in this manner is seen to be nonobvious as it would dramatically alter Linde’s intended operation. Claim 12 is allowable by virtue of its dependency on claim 10. Non-elected claim 13 would also be allowable by rejoinder as it depends on an allowable generic claim. Regarding claim 17, Linde is silent regarding “further comprising a suction arrangement, the suction arrangement having a third suction line with a third suction valve, the third suction line branching off between the inlet pressure compensator and the spool and opening into the collector channel.” Modifying Linde in this manner is seen to be nonobvious as it would dramatically alter Linde’s intended operation. Regarding claim 21, Linde (FIG 4) discloses “wherein the hydraulic system comprises an intermediate section, the intermediate section comprising a preloading valve, wherein the preloading valve preloads the collector channel formed as a return channel to a predetermined pressure.” Modifying Linde in this manner is seen to be nonobvious as it would dramatically alter Linde’s intended operation. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Devices similar to the application are disclosed by Knoll(US 6516614) and Paul (US 3979907) (US 3866419). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICK C WILLIAMS whose telephone number is (571)431-0767. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth Rinehart can be reached at 571-272-4881. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICK C WILLIAMS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 17, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601436
Genderless Aseptic Connector
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595858
INTEGRATED DOT PRESSURE PROTECTION VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588669
Method for Controlling Valves of a Spraying Boom of an Agricultural Spreading Machine
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586767
MULTI-PORT CROSS FLOW SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584426
VARIABLE VALVE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.8%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 509 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month