Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/488,775

ARTIFICAL EYE LENS CAPABLE OF DESORPTING OR ADDING AN OPTICAL LENS AND INSERTION METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 17, 2023
Examiner
SNOW, BRUCE EDWARD
Art Unit
3774
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Wellc LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
745 granted / 995 resolved
+4.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1032
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
§102
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§112
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 995 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 and 7-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Werblin (9,398,949). Referring all figures and embodiments, Werblin teaches an intraocular lens comprising: PNG media_image1.png 296 447 media_image1.png Greyscale a first optical portion including an optical lens 2000; and a support portion 1000 configured to be coupled with the first optical portion, wherein the first optical portion is formed to be detachable from the support portion in a state where the support portion is inserted into an eye of a user (fully capable of). See at least col. 5, lines 59 – col. 6, line 38. Claim 2, wherein the first optical portion further comprises an access body 2100, the support portion comprises a connecting body 1005, the access body and the connecting body can be coupled with each other, and the access body and the connecting body are the same in number, which is at least two or more. Claim 3, the support portion and the first optical portion have shapes “corresponding” to each other so as to be coupled with each other as shown in the included figure above. Claim 4, the through-holes are depicted in the figure above. Claim 7, an intraocular lens comprising: a second optical portion 2000 including an optical lens; and a whole portion 1000 configured to be coupled with the second optical portion and including a basic lens (base lens) formed on a side in contact with the second optical portion (see at least the included figure above), wherein the second optical portion is formed to be detachable from the whole portion in a state where the whole portion is inserted into an eye of a user. Claim 8, wherein the second optical portion further comprises an access body 2100, the whole portion comprises a connecting body 1005, the access body and the connecting body can be coupled with each other, and the access body and the connecting body are the same in number, which is at least two or more as shown. Claim 9, the through-holes are depicted in the figure above. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 6 is allowed. Claims 5 and 10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Werblin (9,398,949) is considered the closes prior art of record. Claim 6: Werblin fails to teach an intraocular lens comprising a combination of all limitations, emphasizing the underlined portion, including a first optical portion including an optical lens; a support portion configured to be coupled with the first optical portion; and an additional optical portion configured to be coupled to the support portion, wherein the first optical portion and the additional optical portion are formed to be detachable from the support portion in a state where the support portion is inserted into an eye of a user, and the first optical portion and the additional optical portion are coupled, respectively, to sides that are symmetrical to each other in the support portion. Claim 5: Werblin fails to teach an intraocular lens comprising a combination of all limitations of claims 1 and 4, further comprising: sealing buttons configured to be inserted into the through-holes formed in the support portion and perform a sealing function. Claim 10: Werblin fails to teach an intraocular lens comprising a combination of all limitations of claims 7 and 9, further comprising: sealing buttons insertable into the through-holes formed in the whole portion. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRUCE EDWARD SNOW whose telephone number is (571)272-4759. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30 am - 5:00 pm Monday through Thursday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Melanie Tyson can be reached at 5712729062. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRUCE E SNOW/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3774
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 17, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594156
PROSTHESIS FOR THE LUNG AND THE USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589011
PROSTHETIC HAND
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12575951
LINER HAVING DIFFERENT REGIONS OF ELONGATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575936
OXIDE LAYER-CONTAINING ZIRCONIUM-NIOBIUM ALLOY ANKLE JOINT PROSTHETIC SYSTEM AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575948
PROSTHETIC FOOT WITH DISTRIBUTED STRESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+8.8%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 995 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month