Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/488,821

OPTICAL SYSTEM, ILLUMINATION SYSTEM, DISPLAY SYSTEM, AND MOVING BODY

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 17, 2023
Examiner
EDENFIELD, KUEI-JEN L
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
107 granted / 140 resolved
+8.4% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
190
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
56.4%
+16.4% vs TC avg
§102
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
§112
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 140 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to the amendment filed 1/23/2026. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5 and 7-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Panagotacos et al. (US20120063166) in view of KIM et al. US20090257245). Regarding claim 1, Panagotacos teaches an optical system (Panagotacos, figs.1-23, abstract, a collimating waveguide, an optical backlight apparatus ; paragraph [0074], FIG. 22 is a diagram 500 of a method of producing a collimated beam of radiant electromagnetic energy using the embodiments of the collimating waveguide 100, 200 and/or the collimating optical backlight described herein with reference to FIGS. 1-21) comprising: a plurality of light sources (Panagotacos, the light emitting elements; paragraph [0054] the point source 203 may comprise one or more light emitting elements; paragraph [0047], FIGS. 8-14 illustrate one embodiment of a collimating waveguide 200, comprises an input surface 202 to receive radiant electromagnetic energy; a point source 203; also see annotated image, fig.11, light sources: the light emitting elements); a light guide member (Panagotacos, figs.8-14, waveguides 200) having a rectangular plate shape (Panagotacos, figs.8-14, waveguides 200 having a rectangular plate shape ), with a width direction being an X-axis direction, a depth direction being a Y-axis direction, and a thickness direction being a Z-axis direction (see annotated image, Panagotacos, fig.10, with a width direction being an X-axis direction, a depth direction being a Y-axis direction, and a thickness direction being a Z-axis direction), the light guide member (200) having an incident surface (see annotated image, Panagotacos, fig.10, fig.13, the incident surface which is virtual surface dividing light control bodies from the light guide member 200) onto which light from the plurality of light sources (see annotated image, Panagotacos fig.10, light sources) is incident in the Y-axis direction (see annotated image, Panagotacos, fig.10, the light guide member 200 having an incident surface onto which light from the light sources is incident in the Y-axis direction), and a first surface (the first surface 208) and a second surface (second surface 204) facing each other in the Z-axis direction (see annotated image, Panagotacos, fig.10, and fig.11, first surface 208 and a second surface 204 facing each other in the Z-axis direction), with the second surface being an emission surface of light (paragraph [0074], collimated beam 224 of radiant electromagnetic energy from the output surface 204); a prism (fig.11, prism 209; paragraph [0041], the linear prism 209) that is provided on the first surface (fig.11, surface 208), the prism reflecting light passing through an inside of the light guide member toward the second surface (see Panagotacos, fig.11, the prism 209 reflecting light passing through an inside of the light guide member 200 toward the second surface 204); and a plurality of light control bodies (see annotated image, Panagotacos, fig.11 and fig.13, plurality of light control bodies) that are positioned between the light sources (see annotated image, Panagotacos, fig.11, light source 203) and the incident surface (fig.10, the incident surface, the plurality of light control bodies controlling light rays output from the light sources and incident on the incident surface (see annotated image, Panagotacos, fig.10 and fig.13, the plurality of light control bodies controlling light rays output 224 from the light sources 203 and incident on the incident surface), wherein the light guide member (see annotated image, Panagotacos, fig.10-11 and fig.13, guide member 200) and the plurality of light control bodies are seamlessly integrated (see annotated image, Panagotacos, fig.10-11 and fig.13, guide member 200 and the plurality of light control bodies are seamlessly integrated), each of the plurality of light control bodies includes an incident lens (see annotated image, Panagotacos, fig.13, incident lens 205 ; paragraph [0038] plurality of linear prisms 205; micro-prismatic structures 205; paragraph [0048], first film comprising the input surface 202 micro-prismatic structures) facing one of the plurality of light sources in the Y-axis direction (see annotated image, Panagotacos, fig.10 and fig.13, the incident lens 205 facing one of the plurality of light sources in the Y-axis direction), each of the plurality of light control bodies causes the light incident from a corresponding one of the light sources to the incident lens to be incident on the incident surface (see Panagotacos, figs.10-11, 13, each of the plurality of light control bodies causes the light incident from a corresponding one of the light sources to the incident lens to be incident on the incident surface), and directions of optical axes of light rays incident on the incident surface by at least two light control bodies among the plurality of light control bodies are different from each other(fig.13, at least two light control bodies --- the linear prisms) among the plurality of light control bodies are different from each other (see Panagotacos,fig.10, fig.13, and see annotated image, Panagotacos, fig.11, directions of optical axes of light rays incident on the incident surface by at least two light control bodies among the plurality of light control bodies are different from each other). Panagotacos does not explicitly teach wherein the plurality of light control bodies are continuously connected to the incident surface of the light guide member without a seam. However, Kim teaches the analogous Light guide member (Kim, abstract, Improved apparatus and method for collecting and directing light from a source via a light guide), and further teaches wherein the plurality of light control bodies (see annotated image, Kim, fig.1, light control member 124) are continuously connected to the incident surface (see annotated image, Kim, fig.1, the incident surface which is virtual surface dividing light control member 124 from the light guide member 125) of the light guide member (see annotated image, Kim, fig.1, the light guide member 125) without a seam (see annotated image, Kim, fig.1, wherein without a seam), and the light guide member (see annotated image, Kim, fig.1, the light guide member 125) and the plurality of light control bodies (light control member 124) are seamlessly integrated ((see annotated image, Kim, fig.1, described above are seamlessly integrated). Kim also teaches wherein the light guide member (see annotated image, Kim, fig.1, the 125) having an incident surface (incident surface) onto which light from the plurality of light sources (122) is incident in the Y-axis direction (Y-axis direction). Thus, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the apparatus of Panagotacos to have the plurality of light control bodies are continuously connected to the incident surface of the light guide member without a seam as taught by Kim for the purpose to provide improved light emission, efficient energy usage, color uniformity, and limited visual artifacts, particularly when multiple, spatially separated light sources are employed to illuminate the backlight (Kim, paragraph [0003]). PNG media_image1.png 690 1288 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 656 1234 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 604 1094 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 704 1110 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, combination Panagotacos-Kim discloses the invention as described in Claim 1 and Panagotacos further teaches wherein an angle (fig.8, the angle between beam 220 and 222) formed by the optical axes of the light rays incident on the incident surface (described in claim 1) by the at least two light control bodies (described in claim 1) is more than 0 degrees and less than or equal to 15 degrees (see Panagotacos, fig.12, where the difference in the angle of 220 of adjacent light control bodies is more than 0 degrees and less than 15 degrees). Regarding claim 3, combination Panagotacos-Kim discloses the invention as described in Claim 1 and Panagotacos further teaches wherein each of the incident lenses includes a plurality of lens units having lens characteristics different from each other (Panagotacos, fig.13, micro-prismatic structures; paragraph [0048], first film comprising the input surface 202 micro-prismatic structures; paragraph [0075], a plurality of linear prisms 202, FIG. 13, each one defining an apex angle θ2, a top tip radius r4, and a bottom tip radius r3, wherein the top tip radius r4 is greater than the bottom tip radius r3), each of the plurality of light control bodies causes light rays incident on the plurality of lens units from the corresponding one of the light sources to be incident on the incident surface, and directions of optical axes of light rays incident on the incident surface by at least two lens units among the plurality of lens units are different from each other (see Panagotacos, fig.12 shows 220 which are incident on the incident surface in different directions. Thus the lens units that make up 205/202 perform this function of creating different optical axes ). Regarding claim 4, combination Panagotacos-Kim discloses the invention as described in Claim 3 and Panagotacos further teaches wherein each of the incident lenses is equally divided into the plurality of lens units by a plurality of planes intersecting each other (see fig.10 and fig.13, the incident lens is equally divided into the plurality of lens units 205/202 by a plurality of planes intersecting each other). Regarding claim 5, combination Panagotacos-Kim discloses the invention as described in Claim 3 and Panagotacos further teaches wherein the plurality of lens units of each of the incident lenses are smoothly continuous (see Panagotacos, fig.13, plurality of lens units are smoothly continuous). Regarding claim 7, combination Panagotacos-Kim discloses the invention as described in Claim 3, and Panagotacos further teaches wherein the plurality of lens units of each the incident lenses (lens units 205/202) includes refraction lens units that refract light rays (paragraph [0004] This type of optical system limits the ability to collimate the field of view and to use micro lens film arrays) and reflection lens units that reflect light rays (paragraph [0037], the input surface 202 of the collimating waveguide 200 shown in FIGS. 8-14.; paragraph [0038] a plurality of linear prisms 205; so reflection lens units that reflect light rays). Regarding claim 8, combination Panagotacos-Kim discloses the invention as described in Claim 1 and Kim further teaches wherein the light guide member (see annotated image, Kim, fig.1, 125) includes a direct optical path along which the light rays incident on the incident surface (see annotated image, Kim, fig.1, the 125 includes a direct optical path along which the light rays incident on the incident surface) are emitted from the second surface (the top surface) only by one-time reflection at prisms (the prism 130). Thus, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the apparatus of Panagotacos to have a direct optical path along which the light rays incident on the incident surface are emitted from the second surface only by one-time reflection at prisms as taught by Kim for the purpose to provide improved light emission, efficient energy usage, color uniformity, and limited visual artifacts, particularly when multiple, spatially separated light sources are employed to illuminate the backlight (Kim, paragraph [0003]). Regarding claim 9, combination Panagotacos-Kim discloses the invention as described in Claim 1 and Panagotacos further teaches wherein an illumination system comprising: the optical system according to claim 1; and the light sources that output the light rays incident on the incident surface (see annotated image, Panagotacos, fig.11, the light sources that output the light rays incident on the incident surface). Regarding claim 10, combination Panagotacos-Kim discloses the invention as described in Claim 9 and Panagotacos further teaches wherein a display system comprising; the illumination system according to claim 9; and a display that receives light emitted from the illumination system and displays an image (Panagotacos, paragraph [0003] Large area backlight systems are used in a variety of display systems including laptop or notebook computer systems, large screen LCD TV screens, sunlight readable avionic/automotive displays, air traffic control displays, and medical display systems, to mention a few.. so the display system comprising; the illumination system according to claim 9; and the display that receives light emitted from the illumination system and displays an image—paragraph [0001] Common liquid crystal display, LCD architectures employ the use of a backlight unit located behind the LCD pixels to provide an illuminated image). Regarding claim 11, combination Panagotacos-Kim discloses the invention as described in Claim 10 and Panagotacos further teaches wherein a moving body (paragraph [0003], automotive) comprising: the display system (paragraph [0003], automotive displays) according to claim 10; and a moving body main body on which the display system is mounted (Panagotacos, paragraph [0003], Large area backlight systems are used in a variety of display systems including laptop or notebook computer systems, large screen LCD TV screens, sunlight readable avionic/automotive displays, air traffic control displays, and medical display systems, to mention a few. Systems such as commercial aircraft cockpit displays and automotive displays including global positioning systems (GPS) navigation systems require extremely bright backlit LCD displays and the ability to direct the output light into an asymmetric field-of-view, as for a pilot and co-pilot LCD displays and to a lesser extent for automotive GPS displays). Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Panagotacos et al. (US20120063166) in view of KIM et al. US20090257245), and further in view of Powell et al. (US20160209574). Regarding claim 6, combination Panagotacos-Kim discloses the invention as described in Claim 3, Panagotacos does not explicitly teach wherein each of the incident lenses includes four lens units, each of which has a different curvature distribution. However, Powell teaches the analogous light guide member (Powell, paragraph [0003] a light guide and multiple light sources positioned along an input end of the light guide), and further teaches wherein each of the incident lenses (see annotated image, Powell, fig.6, incident lens from fig.3, having incident lenses) includes four lens units, each of which has a different curvature distribution (see annotated image, Powell, fig.6, each of the incident lenses includes four lens units, each of which has a different curvature distribution ). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the apparatus of Panagotacos to have lenses includes four lens units, each of which has a different curvature distribution as taught by Powell for the purpose to enable a higher level of concentration of light into the light guide, in a shorter optical path or length (Powell, paragraph [0016]). PNG media_image5.png 680 1212 media_image5.png Greyscale Response to amendment Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims have been considered but are moot because the arguments do not apply to any of the references or portions of the reference being used in the current rejections. Examiner's Note Regarding the references, the Examiner cites particular figures, paragraphs, columns and line numbers in the reference(s), as applied to the claims above. Although the particular citations are representative teachings and are applied to specific limitations within the claims, other passages, internally cited references, and figures may also apply. In preparing a response, it is respectfully requested that the Applicant fully consider the references, in their entirety, as potentially disclosing or teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as fully consider the context of the passage as taught by the reference(s) or as disclosed by the Examiner. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KUEI-JEN LEE EDENFIELD whose telephone number is (571)272-3005. The examiner can normally be reached Mon. -Thurs 8:00 am - 5:30 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Pham can be reached on 571-272-3689. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273- 8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published application may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Services Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199(In USA or Canada) or 571-272-1000. /KUEI-JEN L EDENFIELD/ Examiner, Art Unit 2872 /THOMAS K PHAM/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 17, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 23, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 22, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601915
DISPLAY SYSTEM AND LIGHT CONTROL ELEMENT THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12591108
LENS BARREL AND IMAGING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12578551
OPTICAL LENS SYSTEM AND TIME OF FLIGHT SENSING MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12564321
METHOD TO MONITOR ACCOMMODATION STATE DURING VISUAL TESTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12566320
PANORAMIC MWIR LENS FOR COOLED DETECTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+15.5%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 140 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month