Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/489,057

BGP NEXT-HOP GROUPS FOR MULTI-HOMED SERVICES IN SCALED SERVICE PROVIDER NETWORKS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 18, 2023
Examiner
RUBIN, BLAKE J
Art Unit
2457
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Cisco Technology Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
449 granted / 593 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Minimal -2% lift
Without
With
+-2.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
615
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§103
44.1%
+4.1% vs TC avg
§102
36.1%
-3.9% vs TC avg
§112
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 593 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This action is in response to communication on October 18th, 2023. Claims 1-20 are currently pending. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5-9, and 12-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Nagarajan et al (U.S. Patent Application Publication no. 2018/0034648, hereinafter Nagarajan). With respect to claims 1, 9, and 17, Nagarajan discloses a computer-implemented method, apparatus, and non-transitory computer readable medium of reducing border gateway protocol (BGP) signaling for multi-homed devices (paragraph [0006], lines 1-10, a Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) join synch route to synchronize a join request for a multicast group across the Ethernet segment, wherein a customer edge (CE) router is multi-homed top the plurality of the PE routers), comprising: receiving one or more signals from one or more provider edge devices (paragraph [0032], lines 1-8, provider edge (PE) router 10 learn the MAC address for customer equipment 4), wherein the one or more signals include an address of a membership group associated with a multi-homed device (paragraph [0034], lines 1-4, receive group membership information); receiving, from a provider edge device of the one or more provider edge devices, a service prefix (paragraph [0140], lines 1-3, considered to be part of the prefix), wherein the service prefix is associated with the multi-homed device and the membership group (paragraph [0139], lines 28-34, group address of the IGMP membership report); storing the service prefix and the one or more provider edge devices (paragraph [0038], PE routers within an EVPN may communicate such IGMP instructions by exchanging routing information and forwarding information); and connecting, according to the service prefix and the one or more provider edge devices, to the multi-homed device associated with the membership group (paragraph [0114], attached to the multi-homed ES and receives an IGMP membership report). With respect to claims 2, 10, and 18, Nagarajan discloses the computer-implemented method of claims 1, 9, and 17, further comprising: updating the stored service prefix and the stored one or more provider edge devices after a deviation of the one or more signals (paragraph [0118], update their state information). With respect to claims 3, 11, and 19, Nagarajan discloses the computer-implemented method of claims 2, 10, and 18, wherein the deviation is caused by a change of a signal of the one or more signals, indicating a withdrawal of a failed provider edge device from the membership group (paragraph [0116]-[0117]). With respect to claims 4, 12, and 20, Nagarajan discloses the computer-implemented method of claim 2 and 10, wherein the deviation is caused by a change of a signal of the one or more signals, indicating an addition of a new provider edge device to the membership group (paragraph [0092], new IGMP join request). With respect to claims 5 and 13, Nagarajan discloses the computer-implemented method of claims 1 and 9, wherein the provider edge device is an elected provider edge device selected by the one or more provider edge devices of the membership group (paragraph [0060], lines 1-6, elected PE router). With respect to claims 6 and 14, Nagarajan discloses the computer-implemented method of claims 1 and 9, wherein the service prefix is further associated with one or more VPN service routes (paragraph [0140], lines 11-17, participating within the EVPN domain). With respect to claims 7 and 15, Nagarajan discloses the computer-implemented method of claim 6 and 14, wherein the one or more VPN service routes are updated according to a withdrawal of a failed provider edge device by removing a VPN service route of the one or more VPN service routes, wherein the VPN service route is associated with the failed provider edge device (paragraph [0116]-[0117]). With respect to claims 8 and 16, Nagarajan discloses the computer-implemented method of claims 1 and 9, wherein the service prefix and the one or more provider edge devices are stored in a data table associated with the membership group (paragraph [0038], PE routers within an EVPN may communicate such IGMP instructions by exchanging routing information and forwarding information). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Pati Pat. Pub. 2012/0177054 Elizabeth Pat. Pub. 2021/0099400 Vattem Pat. Pub. 2019/0132241 Nagarajan Pat. Pub. 2018/0248803 Kebler Pat. Pub. 2017/0289217 Zhang Pat. Pub. 2024/0235999 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BLAKE J RUBIN whose telephone number is (571)270-3802. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday, 9am - 5pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ario Etienne can be reached on 571-272-4001. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. 3/23/26 /BLAKE J RUBIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2457
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 18, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598447
ABSTRACT MODEL GENERATION AS A DATA SERVICE FOR EDGE DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588011
COMMUNICATION APPARATUS AND COMMUNICATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587949
COMMUNICATION APPARATUS AND COMMUNICATION METHOD FOR EHT VIRTUALIZATION WITH MULTI-LINK DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574934
METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574788
Asset Management and IOT Device for Refrigerated Appliances
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (-2.5%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 593 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month