Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/489,471

Expandable Device for Defouling Tubular Members

Non-Final OA §102§Other
Filed
Oct 18, 2023
Examiner
KARLS, SHAY LYNN
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
903 granted / 1308 resolved
-1.0% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
1361
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
46.7%
+6.7% vs TC avg
§102
34.0%
-6.0% vs TC avg
§112
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1308 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 3-4, 5-7, 14 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 1/20/26. Applicant's election with traverse of figures 11-13 in the reply filed on 1/20/26 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that there would not be a serious burden to examine all the claims. This is not found persuasive because the different species all recite mutually exclusive characteristics regarding the shape of the cells and channels. These species are not obvious variants of each other. Thus, the search for each species may overlap but the search would be extensive due to the number of species in the application. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 5, 8-10 are is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Unitary catheter capable of repeated on-demand removal of infectious biofilms via active deformation by Levering (Biomaterials, Vol. 77, 2016) (here on out referred to as Levering). Levering teaches a pressure source (abstract); a flow selector in fluid communication with the pressure source (2.5; actuation testing); a controller coupled to the pressure source and the flow selector (3.1; shaft design); and a defouling device (inflation lumens) fixedly installed along an inner luminal surface of a pipe, the defouling device having a plurality of expandable cells (see figure 1) placed selectively in fluid communication with the pressure source by the flow selector so as to receive an inflation medium from the pressure source (2.1; Finite element modeling), each of the plurality of expandable cells having a circumferential extent and a longitudinal extent along the inner luminal surface of the pipe, and an expandable inner wall (outer surface of lumens) with a varying wall property (elastomer; 2.1; Finite element modeling) that varies in a predefined pattern along the longitudinal extent of the expandable cell so as to cause differential inflation along the longitudinal extent of the expandable cell. With regards to claim 5, the plurality of expandable cells comprises: a base having a plurality of channels therein; a plurality of ribs dividing the channels; and an expandable member attached to the plurality of ribs to define the expandable inner walls of the plurality of expandable cells; wherein the plurality of channels is connected to the flow selector. PNG media_image1.png 509 483 media_image1.png Greyscale With regards to claim 8, the varying wall property comprises a shape of the expandable inner wall (see bottom figure above). With regards to claim 9, the varying wall property comprises an inflated shape of the expandable inner wall (see bottom figure above). With regards to claim 10, the defouling apparatus is actuatable such that the differential inflation causes peristaltic pumping (2.4; Biofilm growth in catheter prototypes). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 11-13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 2 includes the limitation that the wall property of the expandable inner wall comprises a thickness that varies along the longitudinal extent of the expandable cell. None of the prior art teach a wall thickness that varies. Thus, it is free from the prior art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHAY LYNN KARLS whose telephone number is (571)272-1268. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th (6am-5pm). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Monica Carter can be reached at 571-272-4475. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHAY KARLS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 18, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594588
Sucker Rod Wiping Tool
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583012
LOCKING ASSEMBLY AND ROLLER ASSEMBLY EMPLOYING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576318
TOWEL WITH INTEGRATED BRUSH
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575662
TOOTHBRUSH WITH REPLACEABLE BRUSH HEAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569324
ORAL CARE SYSTEM, IMPLEMENT, AND/OR KIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+26.6%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1308 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month