Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/489,519

AUTONOMOUS AGRICULTURAL SYSTEM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 18, 2023
Examiner
CHEN, SHELLEY
Art Unit
3665
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Great Plains Manufacturing Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
349 granted / 528 resolved
+14.1% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
551
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§103
64.8%
+24.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 528 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments 1. Applicant's arguments filed 25 November 2025 have been fully considered but are not persuasive. The new limitation is disclosed by at least the newly cited references as detailed in the rejection below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 2. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. 3. Claims 1-3 and 5-20 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bernhardt et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication # 2002/0157841) in view of Gengler et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication # 2001/0004018), and further in view of Blackwell et al. (U.S. Patent # 10,111,373). Regarding claim 1, Bernhardt discloses an autonomous (claims 17, 21, 23, etc) agricultural system (figs, P2, 8, 27, 30, etc) comprising: a mobile power unit (figs, etc) including a power supply (inherently required for agricultural vehicle and implement to operate as disclosed in at least P4-5, 31, 33, 48-49) and one or more drive mechanisms (figs 1-2: wheels, etc); an implement releasably (figs 1-2, P15, 25, etc) secured to said mobile power unit, wherein said implement includes one or more drive mechanisms (figs 1-2, etc); and wherein said implement is releasably secured to said mobile power unit via an articulated coupling (figs 1-2, P16, etc), wherein said articulated coupling comprises a steering mechanism (figs 1-3, P4-5, 31, 33, 48-49, etc), wherein said mobile power unit is configured to transport said implement (figs 1-3, etc), and wherein said mobile power unit is further configured to provide power from said power supply to said implement (P31, 33, 48-49, etc). Bernhardt fails to disclose that said steering mechanism is configured to steer said autonomous agricultural system, such that said articulated coupling assists with maneuvering and turning of the agricultural system, and does not explicitly disclose the power supply. In the same field of endeavor, Gengler discloses that said articulated coupling comprises a steering mechanism configured to steer said autonomous agricultural system, such that said articulated coupling assists with maneuvering and turning of the agricultural system (P24, etc). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Bernhardt to use such a steering mechanism, as taught by Gengler, in order to more efficiently and/or effectively turn the agricultural system (P24, etc), with predictable results. In the same field of endeavor, Blackwell discloses the power supply (abstract, P17-19, 62, etc). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Bernhardt to use a power supply, as taught by Blackwell, in order to enable operation of the agricultural vehicle and implement as disclosed in at least P4-5, 31, 33, 48-49, with predictable results. Regarding claim 2, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said articulated coupling comprises a connection assembly including a vertical pivot (figs 1-2, P16, etc). Regarding claim 3, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said mobile power unit and said implement are configured to rotate with respect to each other about a vertical axis extending through a vertical pivot of said articulated coupling (figs 1-2, P16, etc). Regarding claim 5, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that the steering mechanism comprises an electric linear actuator (Blackwell col 14: 13-15, col 12: 27-30, etc: electric linear actuator in combination with disclosed steering mechanisms). Regarding claim 6, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that the steering mechanism comprises one or more steering cylinders configured to steer said autonomous agricultural system (figs 1-3, P4-5, etc). Regarding claim 7, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that the one or more steering cylinders comprise hydraulic cylinders (figs 1-3, P4-5, etc). Regarding claim 8, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that each of the one or more steering cylinders extends from either said mobile power unit or said implement and include a mating element configured to engage with a mating element associated with the other of said mobile power unit or said implement (figs 1-3, P4-5, 16, etc). Regarding claim 9, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that connection assembly comprises a power coupling configured to permit power and/or communications to be transferred back and forth between said mobile power unit and said implement (P31, 33, 48-49, etc). Regarding claim 10, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that the power coupling comprises an electric coupler configured to transfer electric power between said mobile power unit and said implement (P31, 48-49, etc). Regarding claim 11, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that the power coupling comprises a hydraulic coupler configured to hydraulic electric power between said mobile power unit and said implement (P31, 33, 48-49, etc). Regarding claim 12, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said articulated coupling comprises a connection assembly, and wherein said connection assembly comprises a hitching assembly configured to shift its position in one or more directions (figs 1-2, P16, etc). Regarding claim 13, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said mobile power unit is configured to transport said implement by pulling said implement (figs 1-2, etc). Regarding claim 14, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said mobile power unit is configured to transport said implement by pushing said implement (Blackwell figs 37-39, 49, 53, 59, col 6: 60 – col 7: 1, col 8: 11-46, etc). Regarding claim 15, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that wherein said mobile power unit is autonomously controlled based on a location-determining element associated with said mobile power unit (P25, 49, claim 16, etc; Blackwell abstract, col 21: 48-50, col 22: 20-33, claims 18-19). Regarding claim 16, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said implement is an agricultural implement configured to modify the ground soil (figs, P2, 8, 27, 30, etc: plow). Regarding claim 17, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said implement is an agricultural implement configured to apply material into or onto the ground soil (Blackwell col 8: 18-36, claim 1, etc). Regarding claim 18, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said implement is an agricultural implement configured to harvest crop from the ground soil (Blackwell P16, etc). Regarding claim 19, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said power supply comprises an electric generator or one or more batteries (Blackwell abstract, P17-19, 62, etc). Regarding claim 20, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said drive mechanisms of said mobile power unit comprises one or more tracks (Blackwell figs, etc). 4. Claims 1-3 and 5-20 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bernhardt et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication # 2002/0157841) in view of Cooper (U.S. Patent # 5,823,270), and further in view of Blackwell et al. (U.S. Patent # 10,111,373). Regarding claim 1, Bernhardt discloses an autonomous (claims 17, 21, 23, etc) agricultural system (figs, P2, 8, 27, 30, etc) comprising: a mobile power unit (figs, etc) including a power supply (inherently required for agricultural vehicle and implement to operate as disclosed in at least P4-5, 31, 33, 48-49) and one or more drive mechanisms (figs 1-2: wheels, etc); an implement releasably (figs 1-2, P15, 25, etc) secured to said mobile power unit, wherein said implement includes one or more drive mechanisms (figs 1-2, etc); and wherein said implement is releasably secured to said mobile power unit via an articulated coupling (figs 1-2, P16, etc), wherein said articulated coupling comprises a steering mechanism (figs 1-3, P4-5, 31, 33, 48-49, etc), wherein said mobile power unit is configured to transport said implement (figs 1-3, etc), and wherein said mobile power unit is further configured to provide power from said power supply to said implement (P31, 33, 48-49, etc). Bernhardt fails to disclose that said steering mechanism is configured to steer said autonomous agricultural system, such that said articulated coupling assists with maneuvering and turning of the agricultural system, and does not explicitly disclose the power supply. In the same field of endeavor, Cooper discloses that said articulated coupling comprises a steering mechanism configured to steer said autonomous agricultural system, such that said articulated coupling assists with maneuvering and turning of the agricultural system (col 4: 56-64, etc: “Through actuation of the hydraulic cylinders, particularly those 96,98 controlling movement about the pivot axis 50, the hitch 12 can be used to provide a positive steering force to assist during turns of a tractor with the implement in the soil”). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Bernhardt to use such a steering mechanism, as taught by Cooper, in order to more efficiently and/or effectively turn the agricultural system (col 4: 56-64, etc), with predictable results. In the same field of endeavor, Blackwell discloses the power supply (abstract, P17-19, 62, etc). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Bernhardt to use a power supply, as taught by Blackwell, in order to enable operation of the agricultural vehicle and implement as disclosed in at least P4-5, 31, 33, 48-49, with predictable results. Regarding claim 2, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said articulated coupling comprises a connection assembly including a vertical pivot (figs 1-2, P16, etc). Regarding claim 3, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said mobile power unit and said implement are configured to rotate with respect to each other about a vertical axis extending through a vertical pivot of said articulated coupling (figs 1-2, P16, etc). Regarding claim 5, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that the steering mechanism comprises an electric linear actuator (Blackwell col 14: 13-15, col 12: 27-30, etc: electric linear actuator in combination with disclosed steering mechanisms). Regarding claim 6, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that the steering mechanism comprises one or more steering cylinders configured to steer said autonomous agricultural system (figs 1-3, P4-5, etc). Regarding claim 7, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that the one or more steering cylinders comprise hydraulic cylinders (figs 1-3, P4-5, etc). Regarding claim 8, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that each of the one or more steering cylinders extends from either said mobile power unit or said implement and include a mating element configured to engage with a mating element associated with the other of said mobile power unit or said implement (figs 1-3, P4-5, 16, etc). Regarding claim 9, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that connection assembly comprises a power coupling configured to permit power and/or communications to be transferred back and forth between said mobile power unit and said implement (P31, 33, 48-49, etc). Regarding claim 10, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that the power coupling comprises an electric coupler configured to transfer electric power between said mobile power unit and said implement (P31, 48-49, etc). Regarding claim 11, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that the power coupling comprises a hydraulic coupler configured to hydraulic electric power between said mobile power unit and said implement (P31, 33, 48-49, etc). Regarding claim 12, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said articulated coupling comprises a connection assembly, and wherein said connection assembly comprises a hitching assembly configured to shift its position in one or more directions (figs 1-2, P16, etc). Regarding claim 13, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said mobile power unit is configured to transport said implement by pulling said implement (figs 1-2, etc). Regarding claim 14, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said mobile power unit is configured to transport said implement by pushing said implement (Blackwell figs 37-39, 49, 53, 59, col 6: 60 – col 7: 1, col 8: 11-46, etc). Regarding claim 15, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that wherein said mobile power unit is autonomously controlled based on a location-determining element associated with said mobile power unit (P25, 49, claim 16, etc; Blackwell abstract, col 21: 48-50, col 22: 20-33, claims 18-19). Regarding claim 16, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said implement is an agricultural implement configured to modify the ground soil (figs, P2, 8, 27, 30, etc: plow). Regarding claim 17, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said implement is an agricultural implement configured to apply material into or onto the ground soil (Blackwell col 8: 18-36, claim 1, etc). Regarding claim 18, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said implement is an agricultural implement configured to harvest crop from the ground soil (Blackwell P16, etc). Regarding claim 19, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said power supply comprises an electric generator or one or more batteries (Blackwell abstract, P17-19, 62, etc). Regarding claim 20, Bernhardt in view of Blackwell further discloses that said drive mechanisms of said mobile power unit comprises one or more tracks (Blackwell figs, etc). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHELLEY CHEN whose telephone number is (571)270-1330. The examiner can normally be reached Mondays through Fridays. Examiner interviews are available via telephone. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Erin Bishop can be reached at (571) 270-3713. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Shelley Chen/ Patent Examiner Art Unit 3665 January 16, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 18, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 14, 2025
Interview Requested
Nov 21, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 21, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 25, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12576862
SYSTEM FOR DETECTING A FAULTY ECU ON A VEHICLE NETWORK AND A METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12568872
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EQUIPMENT CONTROL USING LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL-BASED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570274
INFRASTRUCTURE-BASED COLLABORATIVE AUTOMATED PARKING AND LOCATION MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570272
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AT LEAST ONE DEVICE OF A MOTOR VEHICLE, AND ASSOCIATED MOTOR VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12557722
Agricultural Lane Following
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+21.0%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 528 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month