Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/489,865

METHOD FOR CONTROLLING VEHICLE DAMPER TO REDUCE CONTACT SHOCK AND SYSTEM THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 19, 2023
Examiner
MORALES, OMAR
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
HL Mando Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allow Rate
288 granted / 493 resolved
-11.6% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
528
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
60.0%
+20.0% vs TC avg
§102
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 493 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This action is in response to Applicant’s amendment received on September 19, 2025. Upon further consideration the Non-Final Rejection mailed on June 20, 2025 has been withdrawn and a new Non-Final Rejection is presented below. Claim 1-7, 10-18 and 20 are pending in the application. Claims 8, 9 and 19 have been cancelled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-7, 10-18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liu (CN 114379307 A), hereinafter “Liu”, in view of Kimura et al. (DE 195 40 161 B4), hereinafter “Kimura”. Regarding claim 1, Liu discloses a vehicle damper control method to reduce a contact shock, the method comprising: S10) estimating a future displacement of a damper of a vehicle (Abstract); and S20) controlling a damping force of the damper based on the estimated future displacement of the damper (Abstract: “The invention claims a device and method for estimating suspension travel correlation value. a control unit (30) for controlling the control current supplied to the shock absorber (24FL 24RR) generated by the control current to generate damping force, determining coefficients of two functions based on the relationship between the coefficient of two functions of each suspension changing according to the frequency of the control current and the relative vibration and the equivalent damping coefficient (ce (I)) and the equivalent spring constant (ke (I)) of the two functions of the control current and the control current supplied to the shock absorber, and based on the upper and lower acceleration and coefficient of the spring detected by the detecting device (32FL 32RR) is determined two functions, to calculate the relative displacement (zsi) or relative speed (dzsi) between the spring and the spring”). Liu fails to disclose wherein S20) comprises: S21) determining a damping force offset value based on the estimated future displacement of the damper, wherein the damping force offset is a valve input current offset of the damper. However, Kimura discloses determining a damping force offset value based on the estimated future displacement of the damper, wherein the damping force offset is a valve input current offset of the damper (Kimura (Figs. 1 & 20; Claims section: The controller (30) calculates a force (UP *) that offsets the modified calculated force (F *), which balancing force (UP *) is expressed as UP * = -F * - which controller (30) calculates the supporting force (U *) of the body necessary for controlling surface irregularities)). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have modified Liu by incorporating the teachings of Kimura in order to have a more precise and functional control of the displacement of the damper. Regarding claim 2, the modified invention of Liu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein S10) the estimating the future displacement of the damper comprises: S11) calculating a velocity and an acceleration of the damper (paragraphs 140-153: “the electronic control device 30 as a suspension travel associated value estimating device to function, The suspension travel correlation value estimating device estimates the relative displacement zsi and the relative velocity dzsi between the spring and the under-spring by executing the step (210 to 250) and the upper and lower acceleration sensor (s) 32FL 32RR coordinated manner” and “It should be noted that, in the first embodiment, the step of obtaining the upper and lower acceleration in the estimation method of the invention and the step of respectively the control current supplied to the damping force generating device is realized by steps 210 and 220. Furthermore, the step of determining the coefficient is realized by the step 230, at least one of the relative displacement and the relative speed between the operation spring and the spring is realized by the steps 240 and 250”); S12) assuming a range of variation in the calculated velocity and acceleration of the damper (paragraphs 140-153); and S13) estimating the future displacement of the damper based on the assumed velocity and acceleration assumed in S12) (paragraphs 140-153). Regarding claim 3, the modified invention of Liu discloses the method of claim 2, further comprising: multiplying the velocity and acceleration of the damper with the assumed range of variation assumed in S12) by a gain value according to a frequency (paragraphs 45-58, 84-93, 140-153). Regarding claim 4, the modified invention of Liu discloses the method of claim 3, wherein the gain value according to the frequency decreases as the frequency increases (paragraphs 45-58, 84-93, 140-153). Regarding claim 5, the modified invention of Liu discloses the method of claim 4, wherein the gain value according to the frequency has a value of 1 when the frequency is 0 (paragraphs 45-58, 84-93, 140-153). Regarding claim 6, the modified invention of Liu discloses the method of claim 4, wherein the gain value according to the frequency decreases linearly as the frequency increases (paragraphs 45-58, 84-93, 140-153). Regarding claim 7, the modified invention of Liu discloses the method of claim 6, wherein the gain value according to the frequency is determined by the following equation (paragraphs 45-58, 84-93, 140-153) Gain according to frequency = 1-0.02f, where f = damper frequency (paragraphs 45-58, 84-93, 140-153). Regarding claim 10, the modified invention of Liu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the input current offset is 0 when -X < damper stroke < X (where X is a preset value) (paragraphs 45-58, 84-93, 140-153) and the input current offset increases as an X value increases when damper stroke < -X or damper stroke > X (paragraphs 45-58, 84-93, 140-153). Regarding claim 11, the modified invention of Liu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the damper is a semi-active damper (paragraphs 45-58, 84-93, 140-153). Regarding claim 12, the modified invention of Liu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein S10) the estimating the future displacement of the damper comprises: S11) obtaining a velocity and an acceleration of the damper from a velocity sensor or an acceleration sensor of the damper (paragraphs 45-58, 84-93, 140-153); S12) assuming a range of variation in the velocity and the acceleration of the damper (paragraphs 45-58, 84-93, 140-153); S13) estimating the future displacement of the damper based on the assumed velocity and acceleration assumed in step S12) (paragraphs 45-58, 84-93, 140-153). Regarding claim 13, the modified invention of Liu discloses a vehicle damper control method to reduce a contact shock, the method comprising: S10) calculating a velocity and an acceleration of a damper of a vehicle and estimating a future displacement of the damper based on the calculated velocity and acceleration of the damper (Abstract); and S20) controlling a damping force of the damper based on the estimated future displacement of the damper (Abstract: “The invention claims a device and method for estimating suspension travel correlation value. a control unit (30) for controlling the control current supplied to the shock absorber (24FL 24RR) generated by the control current to generate damping force, determining coefficients of two functions based on the relationship between the coefficient of two functions of each suspension changing according to the frequency of the control current and the relative vibration and the equivalent damping coefficient (ce (I)) and the equivalent spring constant (ke (I)) of the two functions of the control current and the control current supplied to the shock absorber, and based on the upper and lower acceleration and coefficient of the spring detected by the detecting device (32FL 32RR) is determined two functions, to calculate the relative displacement (zsi) or relative speed (dzsi) between the spring and the spring”), wherein S20) comprises: S21) determining a damping force offset value based on the estimated future displacement of the damper, wherein the damping force offset is a valve input current offset of the damper (Kimura (Figs. 1 & 20; Claims section: The controller (30) calculates a force (UP *) that offsets the modified calculated force (F *), which balancing force (UP *) is expressed as UP * = -F * - which controller (30) calculates the supporting force (U *) of the body necessary for controlling surface irregularities)). Regarding claim 14, the modified invention of Liu discloses the method of claim 13, wherein in S10), the future displacement of the damper is estimated based on the velocity and the acceleration of the damper calculated by multiplying the calculated velocity and acceleration of the damper by a gain value according to a frequency (paragraphs 45-58, 84-93, 140-153). Regarding claim 15, the modified invention of Liu discloses the method of claim 14, wherein the gain value according to the frequency decreases as the frequency increases (paragraphs 45-58, 84-93, 140-153). Regarding claim 16, the modified invention of Liu discloses a vehicle damper control system to reduce a contact shock, comprising: a damper displacement estimator configured to estimate a future displacement of a damper of a vehicle (Abstract); and a damping force offset determiner configured to determine a damping force offset to control a damping force of the damper based on the estimated future displacement of the damper (Abstract: “The invention claims a device and method for estimating suspension travel correlation value. a control unit (30) for controlling the control current supplied to the shock absorber (24FL 24RR) generated by the control current to generate damping force, determining coefficients of two functions based on the relationship between the coefficient of two functions of each suspension changing according to the frequency of the control current and the relative vibration and the equivalent damping coefficient (ce (I)) and the equivalent spring constant (ke (I)) of the two functions of the control current and the control current supplied to the shock absorber, and based on the upper and lower acceleration and coefficient of the spring detected by the detecting device (32FL 32RR) is determined two functions, to calculate the relative displacement (zsi) or relative speed (dzsi) between the spring and the spring”), wherein in the damping force offset determiner, the damping force offset is a valve input current offset of the damper (Kimura (Figs. 1 & 20; Claims section: The controller (30) calculates a force (UP *) that offsets the modified calculated force (F *), which balancing force (UP *) is expressed as UP * = -F * - which controller (30) calculates the supporting force (U *) of the body necessary for controlling surface irregularities)). Regarding claim 17, the modified invention of Liu discloses the method of claim 16, wherein the damper displacement estimator calculates a velocity and an acceleration of the damper, assumes a range of variation in the calculated velocity and acceleration of the damper, and then estimates the future displacement of the damper based on the assumed velocity and acceleration of the damper (paragraphs 45-58, 84-93, 140-153). Regarding claim 18, the modified invention of Liu discloses the method of claim 17, wherein the assumed velocity and acceleration of the damper are derived by multiplying the velocity and acceleration of the damper with the assumed range of variation by a gain value according to a frequency (paragraphs 45-58, 84-93, 140-153). Regarding claim 20, the modified invention of Liu discloses the method of claim 16, wherein the input current offset is 0 when -X < damper stroke < X (where X is a preset value), and the input current offset increases as an X value increases when damper stroke < -X or damper stroke > X (paragraphs 45-58, 84-93, 140-153). Response to Arguments Applicant’s remarks filed on September 19, 2025 have been fully considered but are moot because the arguments do not apply to the current rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OMAR MORALES whose telephone number is (571)272-5923. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lindsay Low can be reached on (571)272-1196. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /O.M/Examiner, Art Unit 3747 /LINDSAY M LOW/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 19, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 19, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603101
MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR EVALUATING VEHICLE CONDITIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600409
WORK MACHINE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING WORK MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601481
ATOMIZATION BURNER WITH FLEXIBLE FIRE RATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600404
ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED STEERING METHOD AND STEERING SYSTEM FOR VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594984
MOTOR CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+18.3%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 493 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month