Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/489,893

Difference Maker Tape Measure and Method of Use

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 19, 2023
Examiner
BENNETT, GEORGE B
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
423 granted / 533 resolved
+11.4% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
549
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
33.4%
-6.6% vs TC avg
§102
34.0%
-6.0% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 533 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 35 U.S.C 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Garity (US Pat. No. 6,070,338). Regarding claim 1, Garity discloses a tape measure device (FIG 1) comprising: a portable tape measure having a housing 11, a lock tab 5, and a tape 33; wherein said lock tab having a sliding portion for sliding said lock tab from a first tape locking position for preventing said tape from extending from said housing to a second tape unlocking position for enabling said tape to retract into said housing; and further wherein said tape having at least two sets of sequential numbers including a first set of sequential numbers in an ascending order and a second set of sequential numbers in a descending order (the numbers as claimed are shown on the tape in FIG 1). Regarding claim 2, the housing of Garity is shown as having a flat base in FIG 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Garity in view of Holevas et al. (US Pat. No. 5,435,074). Garity discloses the invention substantially as claimed. However, Garity does not disclose a clip attached to the side surface of the housing as claimed. Holevas et al. discloses a clip 80 attached to the side of a tape measure housing so that the tape measure may be clipped to an object hands-free. Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to use the clip of Holevas et al. in conjunction with the Garity device for the purpose of attaching the combined device hands-free to an object. Claims 4-9 and 11-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Garity in view of Tarver, III (US Pat. No. 6,530,159). Garity discloses the invention substantially as claimed. However, Garity does not disclose a third set of sequential numbers or the specific sets of sequential numbers as claimed. Tarver, III. discloses a third set of sequential numbers (see FIGS 6, 7 and 9-11, for example) and various quantities of sequential numbers (FIG 5 discloses 144 sequential numbers and FIG 6 discloses 48 sequential numbers, for example) for the purpose of allowing a tape measure to be adapted for specific applications. Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to use similar number sets to those taught by Tarver et al. in conjunction with the Garity device for the purpose of adapting a tape measure for specific applications. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Garity and Tarver, III as applied to claim 8 above, and further in view of Holevas et al.. Garity and Tarver, III disclose the invention substantially as claimed. However, neither Garity nor Tarver, III discloses a clip attached to the side surface of the housing as claimed. Holevas et al. discloses a clip 80 attached to the side of a tape measure housing so that the tape measure may be clipped to an object hands-free. Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to use the clip of Holevas et al. in conjunction with the Garity and Tarver, III devices for the purpose of attaching the combined device to an object. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to G. BRADLEY BENNETT whose telephone number is 571.272.2237. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH, 8:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Macchiarolo can be reached at 571.272.2375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571.273.8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866.217.9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800.786.9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571.272.1000. /GEORGE B BENNETT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855 gbb 11 DEC 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 19, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 27, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595996
SMALL-SIZED MEASURING DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD OF THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590782
ARCHERY BOW SIGHT SUPPORT SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590789
FISH MEASURING BOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590465
FRAMING BUDDY DECK FRAMING TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584737
MEASUREMENT DEVICES WITH INTEGRAL ANGLE FINDER, SPIRIT LEVELS, AND CASTOR DEVICE PAIR FOR USE WITH LADDERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+16.6%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 533 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month