Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/489,936

ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC PHOTOSENSITIVE MEMBER, PROCESS CARTRIDGE AND ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 19, 2023
Priority
Nov 01, 2022 — JP 2022-175831
Examiner
SEILER, GRANT STEVEN
Art Unit
1734
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
30%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
16 granted / 27 resolved
-5.7% vs TC avg
Minimal -29% lift
Without
With
+-29.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
65
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
71.2%
+31.2% vs TC avg
§102
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 27 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Claims 1 – 5, 7, and 8 are amended for formatting and usage. No new subject matter has been added. Response to Arguments Applicant’s argument that the amendments to Claim 3 and Claim 4 overcome the previously stated rejections under 35 U.S.C. §112(b) are persuasive. Those rejections are withdrawn. In addition, Applicant’s remarks have clarified the limitations recited in Claim 3. The previously stated objection to Claim 3 is therefore withdrawn. Applicant helpfully points out that the hole transport material represented by formula 20 of Azuma does not read on the hole transport material represented by the formula (HTM1) of Claim 1. Applicant’s argument thus overcomes the previously stated rejection under 35 U.S.C. §103. That rejection is updated below. Applicant further points out that the structure taught by Azuma is the same as that represented by instant formula (HTM6), which is used in a comparative example. Superiority of (HTM1) over (HTM6) when used alongside a polyester resin is alleged to be unexpected in view of the prior art. However, as described in the updated rejection below, teaching of (HTM1) alongside a polyester resin in the charge transport layer is found in the prior art. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1 – 5, 7, and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Azuma et al (US PGP 2022/0342326) in view of Nakamura et al (US PGP 2020/0233325). Azuma teaches an electrophotographic photosensitive member, including a photosensitive layer, which may be a multi-layer photosensitive layer comprising a charge generating layer and a charge transport layer ([0002] – [0003]). A polyarylate resin is described ([0005]), which is used as the binder resin of the photosensitive layer ([0008]). The polyarylate binder resin includes repeating units of formulae (1) – (4) ([0022]). Azuma’s formula (1) is a diol unit wherein two oxyphenyl groups, bearing ortho substituents R1 and R2, are connected at their para positions by a linking group X. An example of a unit represented by Azuma’s formula (1), wherein R1 and R2 are each H, and X is a but-2-ylidene group, is a diol unit derived from bisphenol B, the same as the diol portion of instant formula (1) ([0023]). Azuma’s formula (4) is a dicarboxylic acid unit derived from terephthalic acid, the same as the dicarboxylic portion of instant formula (1) wherein X1 corresponds to instant formula (1A). Where both of these units are included in a polyarylate (polyester) resin, the resin would contain a unit of instant formula (1) recited in Claim 1. Azuma details the photosensitive member, which includes a conductive substrate (analogous to a support), and a photosensitive layer ([0063]). The photosensitive layer may have a multi-layer structure, wherein a charge transport layer is disposed on a charge generating layer, which is in turn disposed on the support ([0064] – [0066]). Such an embodiment is depicted in Azuma’s Fig. 2. A protective layer may be present, but the charge transport layer may be the outermost layer of the photosensitive member ([0068] – [0069]). As mentioned above, the binder resin of the charge transport layer is the polyarylate resin previously described ([0079]). Azuma teaches that the charge transport layer contains a hole transport material ([0071]), which may include a triphenylamine derivative ([0081]). However, Azuma does not appear to teach a hole transport material having a structure reading on that of (HTM1). Nakamura teaches an electrophotographic photoconductor including a photosensitive layer (Abstract). The photosensitive layer may be of the multi-layer type, having a charge generation layer and a charge transport layer ([0124]). The binder resin of the charge transport layer may be a polyester resin ([0147]). Nakamura teaches that the charge transport layer contains a charge transport material ([0142]), which is represented by a general formula (I) ([0143]). Further, the charge transport material is preferably represented by a formula (Ia) ([0145]), which is the same as instant (HTM1). Nakamura teaches that incorporation of the charge transport material of formula (Ia) in an amount in a specified range imparts desirable light decay characteristics and suppression of wear to the electrophotographic photoconductor ([0146]). In preparing the photosensitive member of Azuma, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to improve the light decay characteristics and suppress wearing of the photosensitive member by incorporating the charge transport material of formula (Ia) in the charge transport layer as taught by Nakamura. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant application to prepare the photosensitive member of Azuma, having the charge transport material taught by Nakamura in the charge transport layer, resulting in a photosensitive member described by Claim 1. Azuma teaches that the content of hole transport material in the multi-layer photosensitive layer is preferably 10 – 200 parts by mass relative to 100 parts by mass of the binder resin ([0099]). Stated otherwise, that corresponds to a content of hole transport material (analogous to charge transporting compound) of 10 – 200% with respect to the binder resin, encompassing the range stated in Claim 2. Azuma teaches that the content in the polyarylate resin of the structural unit according to Azuma’s formula (3) is 0 – 50% of the total of units of Azuma’s formulae (1) and (3) ([0022]). That allows the diol unit according to Azuma’s formula (1) to have a content in the diol component of 50 – 100%. Azuma further teaches that the content of the structural unit according to Azuma’s formula (4) is 35 – 70% of the total units of Azuma’s formulae (2) and (4) ([0022]). These ranges would allow for a unit reading on instant formula (1) (discussed above) to make up greater than 50% by mass of the resin, reading on the range stated in Claim 3. Azuma teaches that the charge generating layer of the multi-layer photosensitive layer contains a charge generating material ([0070]). Examples of charge generating materials are given, including titanyl phthalocyanine ([0100] – [0101]), satisfying Claim 4. As discussed above, Azuma’s formula (4) is a dicarboxylic acid unit derived from terephthalic acid, the same as the dicarboxylic portion of instant formula (1) wherein X1 corresponds to instant formula (1A), reading on Claim 5. Nakamura teaches a process cartridge, which includes a photoconductor (photosensitive member), and at least one of a charger, an irradiator, a developing device, and a cleaner, and which is detachably mountable on an image forming apparatus ([0221] – [0223]), reading on Claim 7. Nakamura teaches an image forming apparatus which includes a photoconductor (photosensitive member), a charger, an irradiator (analogous to an exposing unit), a developing device, and a transfer device, reading on Claim 8. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Azuma et al (US PGP 2022/0342326) in view of Nakamura et al (US PGP 2020/0233325), further in view of Mitsui et al (US PGP 2015/0286182). The above discussions of Azuma et al and Nakamura et al are incorporated herein. Neither Azuma nor Nakamura appears to teach silica filler particles in the charge transport layer. Mitsui teaches an electrophotographic photosensitive member and an image forming apparatus (Abstract). The photosensitive member may be a lamination type (analogous to multi-layer) photosensitive member having a charge generating layer and a charge transport layer ([0174]). Mitsui teaches that a filler may be added to the outermost layer of the photosensitive member, which may be the charge transport layer, and that the filler particles may be silica particles ([0230]). The filler is added for the purpose of improving durability ([0230]). In preparing the photosensitive member taught by Azuma, having the charge transport material taught by Nakamura in the charge transport layer, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to improve the durability of the photosensitive member by adding the silica particles as filler to the charge transport layer, as taught by Mitsui. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant application to prepare the photosensitive member of Azuma, incorporating the charge transport material taught by Nakamura in the charge transport layer, and having silica particles added as filler to the charge transport layer as taught by Mitsui, resulting in a photosensitive member described by Claim 6. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Grant S Seiler whose telephone number is (571)272-3015. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30 - 5:30 Pacific. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GRANT STEVEN SEILER/Examiner, Art Unit 1734 /PETER L VAJDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1737 07/27/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 19, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 06, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12663734
TONER
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656700
Toner, Toner Cartridge, and Image-Forming Device
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12645162
TONER
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12631980
YELLOW TONER
2y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12607950
TONER
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
30%
With Interview (-29.2%)
3y 5m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 27 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month