Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/490,234

MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR OPERATING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§OTHER
Filed
Oct 19, 2023
Examiner
TECHANE, MUNA A
Art Unit
2827
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
National Taiwan University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allowance Rate
516 granted / 553 resolved
+25.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
568
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
46.5%
+6.5% vs TC avg
§102
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
§112
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 553 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §OTHER
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings received on 10/19/2023 have been accepted by the examiner. Information Disclosure Statement Acknowledgment is made of applicant's Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Form PTO-1449, filed 10/19/2023. The information disclosed therein was considered. Election/Restrictions Newly submitted claims 21-30 directed to an invention that is independent or distinct from the invention originally claimed for the following reasons: Inventions I and the newly added claims 21-27 are related as process of making and product made. The inventions are distinct if either or both of the following can be shown: (1) that the process as claimed can be used to make another and materially different product or (2) that the product as claimed can be made by another and materially different process (MPEP § 806.05(f)). In the instant case invention, the newly added claims 21-27 have separate utility such as the limitation “reverse biasing the first MIS structure to induce a first flat band voltage shift in the first MIS structure; forward biasing the second MIS structure to induce a second flat band voltage shift in the second MIS structure, wherein an absolute value of the second flat band voltage shift is greater than an absolute value of the first flat band voltage shift”, requires a device that is capable of operating first flat band voltage shift in reverser biasing and a second flat band voltage in forward biasing. In case of invention I, it can be made with a different process that does not requires for the flat band voltages shifts in forward and reverse biasing. In regarding to the newly added claims 28-30, are related as process of making and product made. The inventions are distinct if either or both of the following can be shown: (1) that the process as claimed can be used to make another and materially different product or (2) that the product as claimed can be made by another and materially different process (MPEP § 806.05(f)). In the instant case invention, the newly added claims 28-30 have separate utility such as the limitation “and performing breakdown processes to one or more of the first to third MIS structure, so that the insulating layers of the first to third MIS structures have different numbers of breakdown paths therein, respectively.” And “Wherein the first to third insulating layers have substantially the same thickness and the same material”, can only be made with material that requires a third MIS structures having same thickness and the same material as the first and second MIS structures. Wherein invention I, can be made with two MIS structures having different thickness and material. Since applicant has received an action on the merits for the originally presented invention, this invention has been constructively elected by original presentation for prosecution on the merits. Accordingly, claims 21-30 withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention. See 37 CFR 1.142(b) and MPEP § 821.03. To preserve a right to petition, the reply to this action must distinctly and specifically point out supposed errors in the restriction requirement. Otherwise, the election shall be treated as a final election without traverse. Traversal must be timely. Failure to timely traverse the requirement will result in the loss of right to petition under 37 CFR 1.144. If claims are subsequently added, applicant must indicate which of the subsequently added claims are readable upon the elected invention. Should applicant traverse on the ground that the inventions are not patentably distinct, applicant should submit evidence or identify such evidence now of record showing the inventions to be obvious variants or clearly admit on the record that this is the case. In either instance, if the examiner finds one of the inventions unpatentable over the prior art, the evidence or admission may be used in a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) of the other invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 8-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a(1) as being anticipated by Yeh et al (US20060073642). Regarding claim 1: Yeh discloses a method, comprising: forming a first metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS) structure (a first memory cell along a first word line in a memory array 270 in FIG. 21) and a second MIS structure (a second memory cell, on the first word line or on the same bit line as the first memory cell, in a memory array 270 in FIG. 21) wherein each of the first and second MIS structures comprises a semiconductor layer (12 in FIG. 1 or 15 in FIG. 2 or 18 in FIG. 3), an insulating layer (11 in FIG. 1 or 14 in FIG. 2 or 17 in FIG. 3; [0087 & 0097] discloses example dielectric materials, wherein bottom electrode are formed on an insulating substrate) over the semiconductor layer, and a metal electrode layer ([0030, 0088] disclose that any one of the electrodes 10 or 12 may be a metal;) over the insulating layer; performing a first breakdown process to the first MIS structure (memory array 270 in FIG. 21, wherein in each cell stores multiple bits per cell as is disclosed in [0111], the first memory cell is programmed to a 01 state, for example, in FIG. 34); performing a second breakdown process to the second MIS structure (memory array 270 in FIG. 21, wherein in each cell stores multiple bits per cell as is disclosed in [0111], the second memory cell is programmed to 11 state, for example; note that although the claim does not claim any differentiation between “first breakdown process” and “second breakdown process” other than by using a different name, Yeh discloses that each cell is programmed by using progressive breakdown, see [0012, 0015-0017]; the first cell may be programmed by using different progressive amounts of stress for example, see programming in [0033-0040], such that the two cells have a different progression or degree of breakdown, and hence, a different process); performing a first read operation by supplying a reading voltage pulse (a read pulse of Vr=1.3V is applied to the word line when selecting the first cell as illustrate din FIG. 30A-B) to the metal electrode layer of the first MIS structure and detecting a first read current flowing through the first MIS structure ([0108-0109] disclose the read current is compared with reference currents, and the results are decoded as disclosed in FIG. 19 or FIG. 20; see 272 and 276 in FIG. 21 as well, [0110]); and performing a second read operation by supplying the reading voltage pulse (the read pulse of Vr=1.3V is applied to the second cell as illustrate din FIG. 30A-B; could be to the same first word line or to a different word line, depending on the location of the second memory cell) to the metal electrode layer of the second MIS structure and detecting a second read current flowing through the second MIS structure ([0108-0109] disclose the read current is compared with reference currents, and the results are decoded as disclosed in FIG. 19 or FIG. 20; see 272 and 276 in FIG. 21 as well, [0110]), wherein the second read current is greater than the first read current (note that the read current for a cell in state 11 is higher than the read current for the cell in state 01, as seen in FIG. 34). Regarding claim 8, Yeh discloses wherein the first breakdown process comprises reverse biasing the semiconductor layer (FIG 30D; [0128] reverse bias). Regarding claim 9, Yeh discloses wherein the second breakdown process comprises forward biasing the semiconductor layer (FIG 27B; [0121] forward bias) Regarding claim 10, Yeh discloses wherein the insulating layer is a single continuous layer having a bottom surface and a top surface in contact with the semiconductor layer and the metal electrode layer, respectively (11 in FIG. 1 or 14 in FIG. 2 or 17 in FIG. 3; [0087 & 0097] discloses diffusions types 15/18 on bottom of 14/17 and electrodes on top (10,13,16)). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Bandyopadhyay et al (US20140241031 FIG 1; [0032] discloses limiting current through memory cell 10 to a second current limit greater than the first current limit, and memory element 16 switching to a third type of conductivity, wherein third read current is higher than second read current flowing through memory cell 10 upon application of read voltage). Lee et al (US20230223062 FIG 1 & 2; [0032] discloses read current Tred being greater than a reference current Iref). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUNA A TECHANE whose telephone number is (571)272-7856. The examiner can normally be reached 571-272-7856. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amir Zarabian can be reached at 571-272-1852. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MUNA A TECHANE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2827
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 19, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §OTHER
Jan 06, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 09, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640217
APPARATUSES SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFICATION ENCODING FOR MEMORY DEVICES
2y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640225
MEMORY DEVICE WITH A STORAGE COMPONENT
1y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640198
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633325
SEMICONDUCTOR STORAGE DEVICE AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAME
2y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626772
ENHANCED DE-NOISING FOR RANDOM TELEGRAPH NOISE
1y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+6.8%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 553 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month