Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/490,335

SHUTTER-TYPE STORAGE BOX FOR VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 19, 2023
Examiner
LYJAK, LORI LYNN
Art Unit
3612
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Toyoda Gosei Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
1074 granted / 1195 resolved
+37.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1217
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§102
47.5%
+7.5% vs TC avg
§112
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1195 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Japanese reference JP 2012250570A (cited by Applicant) in view of Japanese reference JP 2018199404A (cited by Applicant). Regarding claims 1-3, Japanese reference JP 2012250570A discloses a shutter-type storage box (item storage section 102 in paragraph [0002] as shown in Figure 10) for a vehicle [in paragraph [0002]), the storage box (item storage section 102 in paragraph [0002] as shown in Figure 10) comprising: a box main body (console body 100 in paragraph [0002] as shown in Figure 10) including an opening (upper opening 104 in paragraph [0002] as shown in Figure 10); a shutter (shutter S1 as shown in Figure 10) configured to move along an opening surface of the opening to open and close the opening (upper opening 104 in paragraph [0002] as shown in Figure 10); a shutter housing (the shutter S is housed between a pair of guide rails GR1 and GR2 as broadly as claimed in paragraph [0026] as shown in Figure 10) provided adjacent to the box main body (console body 100 in paragraph [0002] as shown in Figure 10), the shutter housing (the shutter S is housed between a pair of guide rails GR1 and GR2 as broadly as claimed in paragraph [0026] as shown in Figure 10) being configured to house the shutter (shutter S1 as shown in Figure 10) in a bent state (curved portion 112 as shown in Figure 10); and two guide grooves (grooves 114 in paragraph [0004] as shown in Figure 10) located on opposite sides of the shutter (shutter S1 as shown in Figure 1) in a width direction, the guide grooves (grooves 114 in paragraph [0004] as shown in Figure 10) guiding movement of the shutter (shutter S1 as shown in Figure 1), wherein the shutter (shutter S1 as shown in Figure 1) includes: a shutter main body (shutter base material SB as shown in Figure 8) configured to bend (curved portion 112 as shown in Figure 10); a cushion layer (foam body 40 in paragraph [0028] as shown in Figures 1-3) provided on a surface of the shutter main body (shutter base material SB in paragraph [0028] as shown in Figures 1-3); and a covering layer (skin material 50 in paragraph [0028] as shown in Figures 1-3) provided on a surface of the cushion layer (foam body 40 in paragraph [0028] as shown in Figures 1-3), and the covering layer (skin material 50 in paragraph [0031]) includes a plastic film (PVC or TPU in paragraph [0031]). However, JP 2012-250570A does not show the cushion layer is a three-dimensional knitted fabric (claim 1); wherein the three-dimensional knitted fabric is a double-raschel knitted fabric that includes: a back-side knitted fabric layer bonded to the surface of the shutter main body; a top-side knitted fabric layer bonded to a back of the covering layer; and connecting yarns that connect the back-side knitted fabric layer and the top-side knitted fabric layer to each other (claim 2); and wherein a density of the connecting yarns in a moving direction of the shutter is lower than a density of the connecting yarns in the width direction (claim 3). Japanese reference JP 2018199404A teaches knitted fabric is preferable because it provides sufficient cushioning and can be easily impact a three-dimensional feel with varying strengths in paragraph [0017]; the three-dimensional knitted fabric, may be, for example, a structure in which two layers of knitted fabric (front knitted fabric (51) and back knitted fabric (52)) are connected by a binding yarn (53) (see Figure 8) in paragraph [0018]; and this three-dimensional knitted fabric can be knitted by a knitting machine such as a double raschel knitting machine or circular knitting machine in paragraph [0018]. Regarding claims 1 and 2, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the cushion layer of Japanese reference JP 2012250570A is a three-dimensional knitted fabric of a double raschel knitted fabric, as taught by Japanese reference JP 2018199404A , with a reasonable expectation of success in order to provide a versatile, high-performance textile known for its softness, durability, and thermal insulation. Regarding claim 3, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the three-dimensional knitted fabric is used as the cushion layer of Japanese reference JP 2012250570A, as modified, changing the density of the three-dimensional knitted fabric to an appropriate value for each region with a reasonable expectation of success as a matter of design choice. Regarding claim 3, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the shutter curved in the vertical direction and does not change in the width direction of Japanese reference JP 2012250570A, as modified, with the density of the three-dimensional knitted fabric in the moving direction smaller than the density in the width direction to allow the shutter to be curved with a reasonable expectation of success as a matter of design choice. Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. US 20120024857 A1 discloses a roller shutter type storage container includes a container body, a roller shutter accommodating portion, a pair of guide grooves, and a roller shutter; each of the guide grooves extends linearly in an opening formed in the container body and is curved in the roller shutter accommodating portion; the roller shutter is configured by connecting a plurality of slats each having shafts formed at two ends of the slat with respect to the widthwise direction in a bendable manner; as the two shafts of each of the slats slide in the corresponding guide grooves, the roller shutter slides between an open position for opening the opening and a close position for closing the opening; each one of the shafts is spaced from a vertical wall surface of the corresponding one of the guide grooves; a projection formed of soft material projects outward from each shaft of each slat in the widthwise direction and contacts the corresponding vertical wall surface in an elastically deformed state. US 6932402 B2 discloses a console box of the present invention has a box main body, a pair of sidewalls, and an armrest; the box main body is located between the sidewalls, and the armrest is located above the box main body; each sidewall has a guide groove extending in the moving direction of the vehicle; the armrest has a pair of engaging pins; each engaging pin is engaged with and slides along one of the guide grooves; the armrest smoothly slides along the moving direction of the vehicle. Communication Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Lori Lyjak whose telephone number is (571)272-6658. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 AM-4:30 PM (EST) Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy Weisberg can be reached at 571-270-5500. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Lori Lyjak/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 19, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600303
VEHICLE INTERIOR WALL PANEL AND WALL PANEL ASSEMBLY WITH DOOR STOPPER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595005
MODULAR AND SCALABLE ACTIVE REAR DIFFUSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594997
Side Reinforcing Structure of Vehicle Body
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583391
LUGGAGE SPACE-EXTENSIBLE SLIDABLE AND PIVOTABLE BOARD STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576913
VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+8.4%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1195 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month