Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/490,633

AEROSOL GENERATION SYSTEM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 19, 2023
Priority
Jun 28, 2021 — continuation of PCTJP2021024410
Examiner
DEZENDORF, MORGAN FAITH
Art Unit
1755
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Japan Tobacco Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
25%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
69%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 25% of cases
25%
Career Allowance Rate
6 granted / 24 resolved
-40.0% vs TC avg
Strong +44% interview lift
Without
With
+44.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
70
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
89.3%
+49.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 24 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims Claims 1-20 are pending and are subject to this office action. Claims 1-20 are amended. Claim Interpretation Claim 1 recites the limitation, “the first rigid body and the second rigid body are formed of stainless use steel.” The term “stainless use steel” generally refers to the Japanese designation for different grades of stainless steel. The claim does not require a specific grade of stainless steel. Therefore, “stainless use steel” will be interpreted as any grade of stainless steel. Response to Amendment The Examiner acknowledges the Applicant’s response filed on 04/21/2026 containing amendments and remarks to the claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pg. 7-9, filed 04/21/2026, with respect to the rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. 103 over Zhang, in view of Zhou, have been fully considered and are persuasive. Applicant has amended claim 1 to require the first and second rigid bodies are formed of stainless use steel, which was not previously presented. Zhang discloses the first protective layer (124, “rigid body”) is made of glass or ceramic ([0066]). Zhou discloses a protective layer (170) for protecting a conductive substrate (110) from corrosion, the protective layer (170) is a ceramic layer (Fig. 2, [0063]). Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground of rejection is made in view of a new interpretation of previously applied prior art. The rejections below are maintained and modified based on Applicant’s amendment. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 9-12, and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang (CN 212728784 U, hereinafter referring to the English translation provided) in view of Liu (CN 109068417 A, hereinafter referring to the English translation provided). Regarding claim 1, Zhang discloses a non-combustion baking device (1, “an aerosol generation system”, Fig. 3), comprising: A power supply (13) for supplying electric power to a conductive line (123, Fig. 3, [0056-0057, 0064]), A heating element (12) configured to heat an aerosol forming substrate (2, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, [0056]), wherein the heating element (12) comprises: A conductive substrate (121, “electric resistor”) sandwiched between two electric insulating layers (122, 125, Fig. 6, [0057, 0059-0060]), and; Two protective layers (124, 126) sandwiching the conductive substrate (121) and two electric insulating layers (122,125, Fig. 6, [0057]). In some embodiments, two conductive lines (123) may be provided on either side (1211, 1212, Fig. 10) of the conductive substrate (121, “electric resistor”, [0068]). The heater (12) is inserted into the substrate (2, Fig. 1-3, [0056]). The first protective layer (124) is shorter than the second protective layer (126, “have different sizes”, Fig. 4, Fig. 6). The conductive line (123) is electrically connected to the power supply (13) and supplies electric power to the conductive substrate (121) through a connecting portion (1231) such that electricity travels through the conductive substrate (121) to generate heat (Fig. 6, [0059-0060, 0063-0065]) and therefore the conductive substrate (121) is considered to meet the claim limitation of an electric resistor producing heat with the electric power supplied from the power supply unit. Zhang discloses the first protective layer (124) may be formed of glass or ceramic ([0066]). Zhang does not explicitly disclose the first and second protective layer (124, 126) are formed of stainless use steel. However, Liu, directed to a heating device (1, Fig. 1, [0049]) for an aerosol generating device ([0002]), discloses: A heating device (1) comprising a first substrate (101), a second substrate (106), and a heating unit (102) disposed between the first and second substrate (101, 106, Fig. 1, [0049]). The first substrate (101) and second substrate (106) are made of stainless steel to enhance strength and improve heat dissipation ([0050, 0054]). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would be obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art to modify Zhang by forming the protective layers of stainless steel as taught by Liu because both Zhang and Liu are directed to electronic cigarettes, Zhang teaches two outer protective layers, Liu teaches a similar heating element having two outer layers formed of stainless steel to enhance strength and improve heat dissipation, and this involves applying a known material to a similar protective layer in a similar heating element in a similar electronic cigarette to yield predictable results. Stainless steel is considered to be rigid. Therefore, the first and second protective layers (124, 126) disclosed by Zhang formed of stainless steel are considered to be rigid bodies. Regarding claim 2, Zhang discloses that the second protective layer (126, “first rigid body”) is larger than the first protective layer (124, “second rigid body”, Fig. 6). Zhang discloses a holder that holds the heating element (12), as shown in Fig. 3 below. The second protective layer (126, “first rigid body”) is part of the heating element (12) and therefore the holder is considered to hold the first rigid body. PNG media_image1.png 644 563 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 3, Zhang discloses that the second protective layer (126, “first rigid body”) is longer than the first protective layer (124, “second rigid body”) in a direction in which the substrate (2) is inserted (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 6, [0056]). The rejection of claims 9-12 are made in reference to the below annotated Fig. 3 of Zhang. PNG media_image2.png 819 1172 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 9, Zhang discloses the non-combustion baking device (1, “aerosol generation system, Fig. 3), further comprises: A socket (10, “container”) that has an internal space and insertion hole (“opening”) for receiving the substrate (2) into the internal space through the opening (Fig. 1-3, [0055-0057]). The insertion hole (“opening”) is in communication with the outside of the device (Fig. 2). The holder holds the heater (12) such that a leading end of the heater (12) extends from a bottom of the socket (10, “container) towards the insertion hole (“opening”, Fig. 1-3). Regarding claim 10, Zhang discloses the heater (12) is disposed in the internal space of the socket (10, “container”) and the heater (12) comprises the first protective layer (124, “second rigid body”, Fig. 3, Fig. 6, [0055-0057]). Therefore, the second rigid body is at least partially disposed in the internal space. Regarding claim 11, Zhang discloses an end of the first protective layer (124, “second rigid body”) located toward the trailing end of the heater (i.e. a bottom end) is positionally aligned with an inner wall of the bottom of the container (10, Fig. 3, Fig. 6). Positionally aligned is interpreted as positioned such that the second rigid body is aligned with an inner wall of the bottom of the container. Regarding claim 12, Zhang discloses a portion of the heater (12) protrudes into the internal space formed by socket (10, “container”), where the portion of the heater (12) comprises: A conductive substrate (121, “electric resistor”) sandwiched between two insulating layers (122, 125, Fig. 6, [0057]), and; Two protective layers (124, 126, “a first and second rigid body”) sandwiching the conductive substrate (121) and two insulating layers (122,125, Fig. 6, [0057]). Regarding claim 19, Zhang discloses a holder that holds the heating element (12, Fig. 3). Zhang is silent to the material used for the holder. However, Liu, directed to a heating device for an aerosol generating device ([0002]), discloses: A heating device (1) comprising a mounting base (103, Fig. 4, [0075]), The mounting base (103) is made of a high temperature resistant plastic material including polyetheretherketone (PEEK, [0077-0078]). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would be obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art to modify Zhang, in view of Liu by using PEEK for the holder material as taught by Liu because both Zhang and Liu are directed to electronic cigarettes, Liu teaches using PEEK for the holder because it is a high temperature resistant material, and this involves applying a known holder material to a similar heater in a similar electronic cigarette to yield predictable results. Regarding claim 20, Zhang discloses the non-combustion baking device (1, “aerosol generation system), further comprises a substrate (2, Fig. 1-Fig. 3, [0055]). Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang (CN 212728784 U, hereinafter referring to the English translation provided) in view Liu (CN 109068417 A, hereinafter referring to the English translation provided), as applied to claim 2 above, further in view of Zhou (US 20230422354 A1). Regarding claim 4, Zhang discloses the second protective layer (126, “first rigid body”) and the first protective layer (124, “second rigid body”) are tabular (i.e. have a flat surface, Fig. 6). Zhang is silent to the thickness of the first and second rigid bodies. However, Zhou, directed to a heating element for an electronic cigarette ([0002]), discloses A heating element (10) comprising a covering layer (160) and a protective layer (170) provided on the top and bottom surface of the heater (10, i.e. a first and second rigid body, Fig. 2, [0062-0063]). The thickness of the covering layer (160) is in a range of 0.001 mm to 0.01 mm and the protective layer (170) is in a range of 0.001 mm to 0.01 mm ([0065]). Zhou does not require that the thickness of the covering layer (160) and protective layer (170) are the same and discloses separate thickness ranges for each layer which reasonably suggests an embodiment where the thickness of the protective layer (170, a first rigid body) is thicker than the covering layer (160, a second rigid body). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would be obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art to further modify Zhang, in view of Liu, by providing the first rigid body with a greater thickness than the second rigid body as taught by Zhou because both Zhang and Zhou are directed to electronic cigarettes, Zhang teaches a first and second rigid body but is silent to the thickness used, Zhou teaches a similar heating element having a first and second rigid body provided in a range of thicknesses that reasonably suggest an embodiment where the first rigid body is thicker than the second rigid body, and one having ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to look to similar heating elements for thickness ranges, and this involves applying a known thickness to a similar rigid body/protective layer a similar heating element in a similar electronic cigarette to yield predictable results. Claim 5-7 and 13-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang (CN 212728784 U, hereinafter referring to the English translation provided) in view Liu (CN 109068417 A, hereinafter referring to the English translation provided) as applied to claim 2 above, further in view of Dou (CN 112244359 A, hereinafter referring to the English Machine translation provided). Regarding claim 5, Zhang discloses a holder that holds the heating element (12, Fig. 3). Zhang is silent to how the holder fixes the heating element and does not explicitly disclose a first hole and second hole in the holder. However, Dou, directed to a heating element for an electronic cigarette ([0001-0003]), discloses: A heating element (200) mounted on a mounting base (201, “a holder”), the mounting base (201) comprising a mounting base (201a), mounting cover (201b), and sealing element (203, Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10, [0110-0111]), The sealing element (203) portion of the holder comprises a hole (“a first hole”) which the heating element (200) passes through (Fig. 8, Fig. 10, [0110]), The mounting base (201a) and mounting cover (201b) form a 4 sided structure having a hole (“a second hole”) on the top surface, as shown by the dashed lines in Fig. 8 below. PNG media_image3.png 811 843 media_image3.png Greyscale Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would be obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art to modify Zhang, in view of Liu, by providing the heating element in a holder having a first and second hole as taught by Dou because both Zhang and Dou are directed to electronic cigarettes, Zhang discloses a holder for the heating element but is silent to how the heating element is fixed in the holder, Dou teaches a similar heating element mounted in a holder having a first and second hole, and one having ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to look to similar holders for when designing a heating element, and this involves applying a known holder structure in a similar heating element in a similar electronic cigarette to yield predictable results. The Examiner notes that claim 5 does not require that only the first rigid body to pass through the first hole and only the electric resistor and two electric insulators pass through the second hole. Therefore, the entirety of the heating element (200) passing through the first hole and second hold is considered to read on the claim. Regarding claim 6, Dou discloses the first hole in the sealing element (203) is in the shape of a slit (Fig. 8, Fig. 10, [0110]) and holds the heating element (Zhang: 12) comprising the second protective layer (Zhang: 126, “first rigid body”, Fig. 6). Regarding claim 7, the holder clamping the first rigid body is interpreted as the holder tightly holding the first rigid body. Dou discloses the heating element (200) is sleeved on the sealing element (203) portion of the holder and that the holder is fixedly connected to the heating element (Fig. 8, Fig. 10, [0110-0111]). Zhang discloses a heating element (12) comprising a second protective layer (126, “first rigid body”, Fig. 6). Therefore, providing the heating element (Zhang:12) comprising a first rigid body disclosed by Zhang in a holder having a first and second hole disclosed by Dou, is considered to meet the claim limitation of the holder clamping the first rigid body. Regarding claim 13, Zhang discloses a holder that holds the heating element (12, Fig. 3). Zhang does not explicitly disclose the aerosol generation system comprises a sealer that seals a hole provided in the holder. However, Dou, directed to a heating element for an electronic cigarette ([0001-0003]), discloses: A heating element (200) mounted on a mounting base (201, “a holder”), the mounting base (201) comprising a mounting base (201a), mounting cover (201b), and sealing element (203, Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10, [0110-0111]), The sealing element (203) portion of the holder comprises a hole which the heating element (200) passes through (Fig. 8, Fig. 10, [0110]), The sealing element (103, 203) is used to prevent liquid from flowing into holder (101, 201) along the surface of the heating element (100, 200, Fig. 7, Fig. 8, [0108]) which is considered to be sealing a hole in the holder. Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would be obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art to modify Zhang, in view of Liu, by providing the heating element in a holder comprising a sealer that seals a hole around the heater as taught by Dou because both Zhang and Dou are directed to electronic cigarettes, Zhang discloses a holder for the heating element but is silent to the inclusion of a sealer, Dou teaches a similar heating element mounted in a holder having a sealer which seals a hole around the heater to prevent liquid from flowing into the holder, and this involves applying a known sealer structure in a holder in a similar electronic cigarette to yield predictable results. Regarding claim 14, Dou discloses the sealing element (103, 203) is used to prevent liquid from flowing into holder (101, 201) along the surface of the heating element (100, 200, Fig. 7, Fig. 8, [0108]) which is considered to be sealing a hole in the holder. Regarding claim 15, Dou discloses a sealing element (203) is positioned in the top portion of the holder (Fig. 8, Fig. 10, [0110]). Zhang discloses a holder positioned at the base of the heater (12) below an inner wall of the container bottom (Fig. 3). Therefore, the sealing element is positioned between the holder and an inner wall of the bottom of the container. Regarding claim 16, Dou discloses the sealer (203) in nested in the top of the holder (201) such that the mounting base (201a) portion of the holder surrounds the peripheral edge of the sealer (203, Fig. 8). Therefore, at least a portion of the holder is positioned between the sealer (Dou: 203) and an inner wall of the bottom of the container (Zhang: 10, Fig. 3). In regards to the limitation requiring the sealer is disposed opposite an inner wall of the bottom of the container, Dou discloses a sealing element (203) is positioned in the top portion of the holder (Fig. 8, Fig. 10, [0110]) and Zhang discloses a holder positioned at the base of the heater (12) below an inner wall of the container bottom (Fig. 3). Opposite an inner wall of the bottom of the container is considered to be the surface of bottom wall opposite to the inner surface. Therefore, the sealing element is positioned opposite an inner wall of the bottom of the container. Regarding claim 17, Dou discloses a positioner disposed between an inner surface of a bottom wall of the container (10) and the holder as shown in annotated Fig. 3 below. The inner wall of the container (10) is illustrated by the portion filled in with stripes and the positioner is illustrated by the housing portion surrounding the inner wall that is not shaded in. The positioner fills a gap between a bottom wall of the container (10) and the holder (Fig. 3) and therefore positions the inner wall of the bottom of the container. PNG media_image2.png 819 1172 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 18, Dou discloses the sealing element (103, 203) is made of silicone ([0108]). Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang (CN 212728784 U, hereinafter referring to the English translation provided) in view Liu (CN 109068417 A, hereinafter referring to the English translation provided) and Dou (CN 112244359 A, hereinafter referring to the English Machine translation provided), as applied to claim 8 above, further in view of Chen (WO 2018227790 A1, hereinafter referring to the English Machine translation provided). Regarding claim 8, modified Zhang discloses the heating element (Zhang: 12) passes through a second hole formed by the mounting base (Dou: 201a) and mounting cover (Dou: 201b, Fig. 8), as discussed in the rejection of claim 5 above. Zhang does not explicitly disclose the electric resistors and two electric insulators bend away from the first rigid body (126). However, Chen, directed to a heated inhaler (abstract), discloses: A heating sheet (12) mounted in a cover (144, “holder”, Fig. 9, [0041]), where the heating sheet (12) comprises bent portions (1221) increase the stability of the fixing seat (14) holding the heating element ([0042, 0043]). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would be obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art to modify Zhang, in view of Liu and Dou, by bending the bottom portion of the electric resistor and two insulators under the top portion of the holder (i.e. in a direction away from the first rigid body) as taught by Chen because both Zhang and Chen are directed to electronic cigarettes, Chen teaches bending the heating sheet improves stability in the holder, and this involves applying a known structure of a heating sheet to a similar heater in a similar electronic cigarette to yield predictable results. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MORGAN FAITH DEZENDORF whose telephone number is (571)272-0155. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-430pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Philip Louie can be reached at (571) 270-1241. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /M.F.D./Examiner, Art Unit 1755 /PHILIP Y LOUIE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1755
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 19, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 21, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12616240
DOUBLE-LAYER SEAMLESS CAPSULE CONTAINING WATER-SOLUBLE COMPOSITION
3y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12599171
MULTI-PORTION VAPING DEVICE
2y 12m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12575606
AEROSOL GENERATING DEVICE COMPRISING A CARTRIDGE
3y 3m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12532920
ELECTRONIC VAPORIZATION DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12514292
ELECTRONIC VAPORIZATION DEVICE AND VAPORIZER AND HEATING COMPONENT THEREOF
3y 0m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
25%
Grant Probability
69%
With Interview (+44.2%)
2y 10m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 24 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month