DETAILED ACTION
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claims 1-2, 6-7 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim et al. (KR20110021597A).
Regarding claim 1 ,Kim discloses A pop-up deploying type door curtain assembly for a vehicle, the assembly comprising: a curtain (10) deployable to cover a door glass (4) when drawn out from a vehicle door (2) (figs 1-7); a rod (54, 56) configured to be installed on the vehicle door to ascend and descend and configured to support the curtain in a deployed state (figs 1-7); a slider (76b, 78b) fixed to the rod and configured to ascend or descend integrally with the rod (figs 1-7); a first drum apparatus (74a) configured to elastically support the slider in an ascending direction in order to allow the curtain to be deployed (figs 1-7, pages 2-3); and a button apparatus (70a) configured to limit a deployment of the curtain in a state in which the curtain is accommodated in the vehicle door (page 3).
Regarding claim 2, Kim further discloses a first cable (76) comprising a first end portion configured to be fixed to one side of the vehicle door (figs 3-4), the first cable being configured to elastically support a lower end portion of the slider and to be wound around the first drum apparatus (figs 3-5).
Regarding claim 6, Kim further discloses a second cable (78) configured to move the curtain downward in conjunction with a descending operation of the door glass (figs 1-7).
Regarding claim 7, Kim further discloses a second drum apparatus (70b) configured to move the slider downward in conjunction with the descending operation of the door glass (figs 1-7).
Regarding claim 19, Kim discloses a vehicle comprising: a vehicle door (2) (figs 1-7); a door glass (4) disposed in the vehicle door (fig 1-7); and a pop-up deploying type door curtain assembly for a vehicle, the assembly comprising: a curtain (10) deployable to cover a door glass (4) when drawn out from a vehicle door (2) (figs 1-7); a rod (54, 56) configured to be installed on the vehicle door to ascend and descend and configured to support the curtain in a deployed state (figs 1-7); a slider (76b, 78b) fixed to the rod and configured to ascend or descend integrally with the rod (figs 1-7); a first drum apparatus (74a) configured to elastically support the slider in an ascending direction in order to allow the curtain to be deployed (figs 1-7, pages 2-3); and a button apparatus (70a) configured to limit a deployment of the curtain in a state in which the curtain is accommodated in the vehicle door (page 3) ; a first cable (76) comprising a first end portion configured to be fixed to one side of the vehicle door (figs 3-4), the first cable being configured to elastically support a lower end portion of the slider and to be wound around the first drum apparatus (figs 3-5); and a second cable (78) configured to move the curtain downward in conjunction with a descending operation of the door glass (figs 1-7)..
Claims 1-2, 5, 13-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yasuda et al. (US 20170136855).
Regarding claims 1 and 13, Yasuda discloses a pop-up deploying type door curtain assembly for a vehicle, the assembly comprising: a curtain (22) deployable to cover a door glass (16) when drawn out from a vehicle door ([0033], figs 1-13); a rod (60) configured to be installed on the vehicle door to ascend and descend and configured to support the curtain in a deployed state (figs 1-13); a slider (100) fixed to the rod and configured to ascend or descend integrally with the rod (figs 1-13, [0076]); a first drum apparatus (53, 54) configured to elastically support the slider in an ascending direction in order to allow the curtain to be deployed (figs 1-13); and a button apparatus (84, 88) configured to limit a deployment of the curtain in a state in which the curtain is accommodated in the vehicle door (figs 1-9, [0050]-[0058]), wherein the button apparatus comprises: a button (88) operable by an occupant (figs 1-9, [0050]-[0058]); and a stopper (84) configured to limit an ascending operation of an upper end portion of the curtain, wherein (figs 1-9, [0050]-[0058]), in a state in which the button is operated by the occupant, the stopper is configured to separate from the upper end portion of the curtain (figs 1-9, [0050]-[0058]).
Regarding claim 2, Yasuda further discloses a first cable (56) comprising a first end portion configured to be fixed to one side of the vehicle door (fig 10), the first cable being configured to elastically support a lower end portion of the slider and to be wound around the first drum apparatus (fig 10).
Regarding claim 5, Yasuda further discloses a guide rail (70) with which the slider is slidably assembled and to which the first end portion of the first cable is fixed (figs 1-9).
Regarding claim 14, Yasuda further discloses that he button and the stopper are slidingly coupled (figs 7-9); and a direction change gear (82h2) configured to slide the stopper in a direction opposite to an operating direction of the button is installed between the button and the stopper (figs 7-9).
Regarding claim 15, Yasuda further discloses a return spring (86) configured to elastically support the button in order to return the operated button to its previous state ([0058]).
Regarding claim 16, Yasuda further discloses shade bar (40) installed at the upper end portion of the curtain in a length direction of the vehicle (figs 1-9 ); and a catch hook (42) disposed at the shade bar and configured to be caught and fixed to the stopper (figs 1-9, [0050]-[0058]).
Regarding claim 17, Yasuda further discloses that a lower surface of the stopper and an upper surface of the catch hook are each provided in a flat surface to limit an ascending operation of the catch hook (fig 7).
Regarding claim 18, Yasuda further discloses that an end portion of the stopper and the catch hook each have a round shape to allow the catch hook to descend (figs 7-9).
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (KR20110021597A) as applied to claim 2 above, and further in view of Hansen et al. (US20090078379).
Regarding claim 3, Kim further discloses that the first drum apparatus comprises: a first drum (70a) around which the first cable is configured to be wound (figs 3-5);
Kim is silent regarding a first cable spring configured to elastically support the first drum in a direction in which the first cable is to be wound around the first drum.
Hansen teaches a first cable spring (clock spring disclosed in [0044]) configured to elastically support the first drum (44) in a direction in which the first cable is to be wound around the first drum ([0044], fig 2).
Before the effective filling date, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Kim and Yasuda before him or her, to modify the apparatus/method disclosed by Kim to include the spring as taught by Hansen in order to bias the rod toward the extended position ([0044]).
Allowable Subject Matter
Claims 4, 8-12 and 20 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANY E AKAKPO whose telephone number is (469)295-9255. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am - 5pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicole Coy can be reached on (571) 272-5405. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/DANY E AKAKPO/Examiner, Art Unit 3672
1/9/2026