Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/491,967

POP-UP DEPLOYING TYPE DOOR CURTAIN ASSEMBLY FOR VEHICLE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Oct 23, 2023
Priority
Jun 19, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0078297
Examiner
AKAKPO, DANY E
Art Unit
3672
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Ashimori Korea Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
469 granted / 538 resolved
+35.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
574
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
67.5%
+27.5% vs TC avg
§102
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
§112
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 538 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The amendments filed on 04/21/2026 have been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim et al. (KR20110021597A). Regarding claim 1 ,Kim discloses A pop-up deploying type door curtain assembly for a vehicle, the assembly comprising: a curtain (10) deployable to cover a door glass (4) when drawn out from a vehicle door (2) (figs 1-7); a rod (54, 56) configured to be installed on the vehicle door to ascend and descend and configured to support the curtain in a deployed state (figs 1-7); a slider (76b, 78b) fixed to the rod and configured to ascend or descend integrally with the rod (figs 1-7); a first drum apparatus (76a) configured to elastically support the slider in an ascending direction in order to allow the curtain to be deployed (figs 1-7, pages 2-3); and a button apparatus (70a) configured to limit a deployment of the curtain in a state in which the curtain is accommodated in the vehicle door (page 3), a second drum (78b) apparatus: and a second cable (78) configured to move the curtain downward in conjunction with a descending operation of the door glass (figs 1-7, pages 2-3), wherein at least a portion of the second cable is configured to be wound around the second drum apparatus (figs 1-7), and an intermediate portion of the second cable is operatively coupled to a connection member (77) operably coupled to the slider (figs 1-7). Regarding claim 2, Kim further discloses a first cable (76) comprising a first end portion configured to be fixed to one side of the vehicle door (figs 3-4), the first cable being configured to elastically support a lower end portion of the slider and to be wound around the first drum apparatus (figs 3-5), Regarding claim 7, Kim further discloses a second drum apparatus (70b) configured to move the slider downward in conjunction with the descending operation of the door glass (figs 1-7). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (KR20110021597A) as applied to claim 2 above, and further in view of Hansen et al. (US20090078379). Regarding claim 3, Kim further discloses that the first drum apparatus comprises: a first drum (76a) around which the first cable is configured to be wound (figs 1-7); Kim is silent regarding a first cable spring configured to elastically support the first drum in a direction in which the first cable is to be wound around the first drum. Hansen teaches a first cable spring (clock spring disclosed in [0044]) configured to elastically support the first drum (44) in a direction in which the first cable is to be wound around the first drum ([0044], fig 2). Before the effective filling date, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Kim and Yasuda before him or her, to modify the apparatus/method disclosed by Kim to include the spring as taught by Hansen in order to bias the rod toward the extended position ([0044]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13-19 and 21-23 are allowed. Claims 5 and 8-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANY E AKAKPO whose telephone number is (469)295-9255. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicole Coy can be reached on (571) 272-5405. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANY E AKAKPO/Examiner, Art Unit 3672 06/19/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 23, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 21, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12655741
AUTOMATED SLIDE DETECTION USING BOTH SURFACE TORQUE AND SURFACE RPM FOR DIRECTIONAL DRILLING APPLICATIONS
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12623583
VEHICLE
2y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12623725
VEHICLE REAR STRUCTURE
2y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617360
RETRACTABLE BUMPER ASSEMBLY WITH ACTUATOR BASED ON VEHICLE SPEED
2y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12617475
VEHICLE BODY REAR STRUCTURE
2y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.8%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 538 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month