Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/492,211

IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 23, 2023
Priority
Nov 08, 2022 — JP 2022-178639
Examiner
VALENCIA, ALEJANDRO
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
43%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
49%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 43% of resolved cases
43%
Career Allowance Rate
594 granted / 1391 resolved
-25.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
160 currently pending
Career history
1528
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
55.0%
+15.0% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1391 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Objections Claims 1 and 4 are objected to because of the following informalities: “the current supply” lacks antecedent basis. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yamaguchi (2022/0258509) in view of Mizukami (6,491,450) and Itagaki (2017/0048423). Regarding claims 1 and 4, Yamaguchi teaches an image forming apparatus comprising: an image carrier (fig. 1, item P); an image forming unit (fig 1, item 41) configured to form an image on the image carrier (see fig. 1); a measuring unit ([0065]-[0066], fig. 9, item 47/48) provided with a light-emitting element for emitting light to the image carrier and a light-receiving element for receiving reflected light from the image carrier, and configured to measure the reflected light from the image carrier ([0065]-[0066], fig. 9, item 46-48); a retaining member (fig. 9, item 46) configured to retain the measuring unit (see fig. 9); a shutter (fig. 9, item 81) configured to block the light emitted from the light-emitting element of the measuring unit to the image carrier ([0065]-[0067]); an abutting portion (fig. 9, bottom surface of item 46 surrounding item 48) of the retaining member; a drive source (fig. 9, item 82); a drive control unit (fig. 3, item 110) configured to control the drive source to separate the shutter from the abutting portion of the retaining member ([0066], see fig. 9) so that the shutter enters an open state where the image carrier is irradiated with the light from the light-emitting element ([0066]); an adjustment unit configured to cause the light-emitting element of the measuring unit to emit light ([0066]), and a control unit (fig. 3, item 118) configured to control the image forming unit to form a measurement image ([0046]). Yamaguchi does not teach specific currents/voltages applies to the drive source or a spring against which the drive force acts. Mizukami teaches a control the drive control unit to supply a first current to the drive source so that the shutter enters the open state, the drive control unit once stops the current supply to the drive source, then supplies a second current smaller than the first current to the drive source, and then stops the current supply again wherein, the shutter transitions from the closed state to a first open state in which the image carrier is irradiated with light from the light-emitting element, and then to the closed state by stopping of the first current after supplying the first current, and, the shutter transitions from the closed state in response to the second current but returns to the closed state without reaching the first open state, such that the irradiation of the image carrier with light from the light-emitting element is prevented during supply of the second current (Mizukami, see fig. 3, Note first current +V applied from t1 to t2 and second current +V applied from t8 to t9, wherein because the duration of the second current application is shorter than the first, the total current is smaller in the second application than the first, and note also that the shutter moves, i.e., transitions, in response to the second current being applied), the second current being supplied after the shutter has returned to the closed state following supply of the first current (Mizukami, see fig. 3, Note second current corresponding to +V applied from t8 to t9 is supplied after the shutter is closed in time period T3 and after the first current is supplied from t1 to t2) and a spring member configured to pull the shutter so that the shutter comes into contact with an abutting portion of the retaining member to enter a closed state where the shutter blocks the light emitted from the light-emitting element to the image carrier; against a pulling force of the spring member (Mizukami, fig. 1, Note spring member 20d). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to use a spring-biased shutter with a current/voltage application technique, as disclosed by Mizukami, as the shutter disclosed by Yamaguchi because doing so would amount to combining a known shutter structure and operational method to a known printer sensor/shutter arrangement to obtain predictable results. In other words, because Yamaguchi does not go into detail about the specific operation of its shutter, it would have been obvious to one of skill in the art to look to Mizukami for specifics on how such a sensor/camera shutter could be implemented. Upon combination of Mizukami with Yamaguchi, the resultant device would: control the measuring unit to measure reflected light from the measurement image, and control the image forming unit based on a result of the measurement of the measurement image by the measuring unit. Yamaguchi in view of Mizukami does not teach a reference member. Itagaki teaches a reference member disposed on the shutter and causing the light-receiving element of the measuring unit to receive reflected light from the reference member, and adjust the emitted light amount of the light-emitting element based on a result of the measurement of the reference member by the measuring unit (Itagaki, [0031]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to add the reference plate disclosed by Itakagi to the shutter disclosed by Yamaguchi in view of Mizukami because doing so would allow for doing so would allow for detection of base levels of light in order to calibrate the printing system. Regarding claims 2 and 5, Yamaguchi in view of Mizukami and Itagaki teaches the image forming apparatus according to claims 1 and 4, respectively, wherein the drive source is a solenoid having a plunger (Yamaguchi, [0066], see fig. 9, Note that this is necessarily the case). Regarding claims 3 and 6, Yamaguchi in view of Mizukami and Itagaki teaches the image forming apparatus according to claims 1 and 4, respectively, wherein the shutter is controlled to move in a direction intersecting with a gravity direction from the closed state to enter the open state (Yamaguchi, see fig. 9). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 8/6/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The claims have been amended to further specify the operation of the apparatus, but the amendments fail to distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. The rejections above have been updated to reflect the changes to the claims. The standing prior art rejection is maintained. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEJANDRO VALENCIA whose telephone number is (571)270-5473. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, RICARDO MAGALLANES can be reached at 571-202-5960. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEJANDRO VALENCIA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 6 earlier events
Nov 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 23, 2026
Response Filed
May 06, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 06, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12752537
LIQUID EJECTION DEVICE CONTROL METHOD AND LIQUID EJECTION DEVICE
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12741466
WIPER UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734799
SUBSTRATE TREATING CONTROL METHOD, SUBSTRATE TREATING APPARATUS, SUBSTRATE TREATING METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM STORED IN COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR TREATING SUBSTRATE
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734815
CARTRIDGE AND PRINTING APPARATUS
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734830
LIQUID EJECTION DEVICE AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING LIQUID EJECTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
43%
Grant Probability
49%
With Interview (+6.2%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1391 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month