Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/492,228

METHODS OF PREPARING ALUMINUM OXIDE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Oct 23, 2023
Examiner
NGUYEN, CAM N
Art Unit
1736
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Saudi Arabian Oil Company
OA Round
2 (Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1097 granted / 1294 resolved
+19.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1330
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§102
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
§112
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1294 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment 1. The amendment filed on 06/22/2026 has been made of record and entered. Abstract has been amended. Claims 1 & 11 have been amended. Claims 5 & 14 have been canceled. Claims 1-4, 6-13, & 15-20 are currently pending in this application and under consideration. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 (Second Paragraph) 2. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The instant claim 4 appears failing to further limit the alumina compounds recited in claim 1. Claim 1 recites “the alumina compounds comprise boehmite, and wherein the catalyst comprises about 35 wt.% to about 65 wt.% boehmite”. Claim 4 recites “the alumina compounds comprise boehmite, ϒ-aluminum oxide, corundum, gibbsite, or a combination thereof”. Boehmite is required in the alumina compounds in claim 1, however boehmite is one of the alumina compounds being listed in the Markush group in claim 4. Response to Applicants’ Arguments 3. Applicants’ remarks submitted with the amendment on 06/22/2026 have been fully reviewed, the amendments to the claims appeared overcome the rejection(s) and/or objection(s) made in the last office action (dated 03/26/2026). Applicants’ amendment to claim 1 raises an issue under 35 U.S.C. 112 (Second Paragraph) thus a new ground of rejection has been applied to claim 4. See above for detailed explanation. Allowable Subject Matter 4. Claims 1-3, 6-13, & 15-20 are allowable over the prior art. A statement of reason(s) for allowance of the claimed subject matter can be found in the last office action, page 6 (dated 03/26/2026). 5. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Conclusion 6. Claims 1-4, 6-13, & 15-20 are pending. Claims 1-3, 6-13, & 15-20 are allowed. Claim 4 is rejected. Contacts 7. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Primary Examiner CAM N. NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1357. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F (8:30 am – 5:00 pm) at alternative worksite or at cam.nguyen@uspto.gov. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Zimmer, can be reached at 571-270-3591. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Cam N. Nguyen/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1736 /CNN/ August 20, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 23, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 22, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741881
Method for High-Value Application of PTA Residue High-Concentration Bromine-Containing Wastewater to Preparation of Cuprous Bromide
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12704507
MULTIFUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC-OPTICAL NANOPARTICLES
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702968
THREE-WAY CONVERSION CATALYST COMPOSITION COMPRISING PLATINUM-RHODIUM BIMETALLIC COMPONENTS
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702969
PARTICLES WITH PREFERRED ATTRITION PROPERTIES
1y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697603
PRODUCTION OF POROUS ALPHA-ALUMINA SUPPORTS FROM BOEHMITIC DERIVED ALUMINAS
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+12.3%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1294 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month