Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/492,879

CHARGING/DISCHARGING POWER CONVERSION SYSTEM AND AUXILIARY CURRENT CONTROL CIRCUIT AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 24, 2023
Priority
Mar 16, 2023 — provisional 63/490,673 +1 more
Examiner
SAVUSDIPHOL, PAULTEP
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Richtek Technology Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
583 granted / 758 resolved
+16.9% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
774
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
51.2%
+11.2% vs TC avg
§102
35.3%
-4.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 758 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 1. Claims 1-20 have been presented for examination. Priority 2. The instant application claims benefit of US Provisional Application No. 63/490,673, filed 3/16/2023. Acknowledgement is made to Applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 3. Claims 1, 4, 5, 8-10, & 13-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kristjansson (US 2019/0214837 A1). Regarding claim 1, Kristjansson discloses a charging/discharging power conversion system, which is configured to operably conduct a power conversion between an input power at an input node and a charging power at a charging node, so as to execute an operation of charging or an operation of discharging on a first battery (104 – first battery) and a second battery (106 – second battery) [0031 & 0042-0048]; the charging/discharging power conversion system comprising: a current control circuit, wherein a serial connection of the second battery and a current control transistor of the current control circuit is connected in parallel to a first battery between a charging node and a reference voltage level, wherein the current control circuit is configured to operably control a second battery current of a second battery power at a second battery node flowing between the current control circuit and the second battery, such that the second battery current is not greater than a second battery current threshold [0031-0033, 0042, 0049, & 0050]; and an auxiliary current control circuit including: a current measurement circuit, which is configured to operably measure a first battery current of a first battery power at a first battery node flowing between the charging node and the first battery, and the current measurement circuit is configured to operably generate a battery current signal [0032-0035]; and a current adjustment circuit, which is configured to operably adjust a charging current of the charging power according to the battery current signal via an adjustment procedure, so that the first battery current is not greater than a first battery current threshold [0041, 0053, & 0054]; wherein the adjustment procedure includes following steps: setting the first battery current threshold by the current adjustment circuit [0050 & 0051]; setting an initial value of the charging current by the current adjustment circuit, such that the initial value of the charging current is equal to a sum of the first battery current threshold plus the second battery current threshold [0052]; and adjusting the charging current based upon the first battery current and the first battery current threshold by the current adjustment circuit, such that the first battery current is not greater than the first battery current threshold [0054]; wherein the charging node is coupled to the first battery node, whereas, the charging node is coupled to the second battery node via the current control circuit [0031, 0032, 0042, & 0043]. Regarding claim 4, Kristjansson discloses the charging/discharging power conversion system as claimed in claim 1, wherein in a case when a first battery voltage of the first battery power is smaller than a second battery voltage of the second battery power, the current control circuit is configured to operably control the current control transistor, such that the second battery current is not smaller than zero [0029-0032 & 0046-0048]. Regarding claim 5, Kristjansson discloses the charging/discharging power conversion system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the current control circuit is independent from the auxiliary current control circuit [0033-0035]. Regarding claim 8, Kristjansson discloses the charging/discharging power conversion system as claimed in claim 5, wherein the current adjustment circuit includes: a micro control unit (MCU) [0035 & 0043-0045]. Regarding claim 9, Kristjansson discloses the charging/discharging power conversion system as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: a current error amplifier, which is configured to operably adjust the charging current in accordance with a charging current threshold and the charging current, so that the charging current remains at a preset level, wherein the current adjustment circuit is configured to operably adjust the charging current threshold, hence adjusting the charging current [0032-0036]. Regarding claim 10, Kristjansson discloses a control method of a charging/discharging power conversion system, which is configured to operably conduct a power conversion between an input power at an input node and a charging power at a charging node [0031 & 0042-0048]; the control method comprising following steps: controlling a second battery current of a second battery power flowing through a second battery node, such that the second battery current is not greater than a second battery current threshold [0051]; measuring a first battery current of a first battery power flowing through a first battery node and generating a battery current signal [0034, 0041, 0053, & 0054]; and adjusting a charging current of the charging power according to the battery current signal via an adjustment procedure, so that the first battery current is not greater than a first battery current threshold [0053 & 0054]; wherein the charging current is equal to a sum of the first battery current plus the second battery current [0041 & 0052]; wherein the adjustment procedure includes following steps: setting the first battery current threshold [0050 & 0051]; setting an initial value of the charging current, such that the initial value of the charging current is equal to a sum of the first battery current threshold plus the second battery current threshold [0052]; and adjusting the charging current based upon the first battery current and the first battery current threshold, such that the first battery current is not greater than the first battery current threshold [0054]. Regarding claim 13, Kristjansson discloses the control method as claimed in claim 10, further comprising following steps: in a case when a first battery voltage of the first battery power is smaller than a second battery voltage of the second battery power, controlling the current control transistor, such that the second battery current is not smaller than zero [0029-0031 & 0046-0048]. Regarding claim 14, Kristjansson discloses the control method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the step of adjusting the charging current of the charging power according to the battery current signal via the adjustment procedure further comprises following steps: adjusting the charging current in accordance with a charging current threshold and the charging current, so that the charging current remains at a preset level; and adjusting the charging current threshold, hence adjusting the charging current [0032-0036]. Regarding claim 15, Kristjansson discloses an auxiliary current control circuit, which is configured to operably control a charging current of a charging power at a charging node in a charging/discharging power conversion system, thereby controlling a first battery current of a first battery power at a first battery node, wherein the charging/discharging power conversion system is configured to operably conduct a power conversion between an input power at an input node and the charging power at the charging node [0031 & 0042-0048]; the auxiliary current control circuit comprising: a current measurement circuit, which is configured to operably measure a first battery current of a first battery power at a first battery node flowing between the charging node and the first battery, and the current measurement circuit is configured to operably generate a battery current signal [0032-0035]; and a current adjustment circuit, which is configured to operably adjust a charging current of the charging power according to the battery current signal via an adjustment procedure, so that the first battery current is not greater than a first battery current threshold [0041, 0053, & 0054]; wherein the adjustment procedure includes following steps: setting the first battery current threshold by the current adjustment circuit [0050 & 0051]; setting an initial value of the charging current by the current adjustment circuit, such that the initial value of the charging current is equal to a sum of the first battery current threshold plus the second battery current threshold [0052]; and adjusting the charging current based upon the first battery current and the first battery current threshold by the current adjustment circuit, such that the first battery current is not greater than the first battery current threshold [0054]; wherein the charging current is equal to a sum of the first battery current plus the second battery current [0041 & 0052]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. 4. Claims 2, 11, & 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kristjansson in view of Vilhauer et al. (US 2012/0249084 A1), hereinafter Vilhauer. Regarding claim 2, Kristjansson discloses the charging/discharging power conversion system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the current adjustment circuit is configured to operably adjust the charging current according to the first battery current as well as the first battery current threshold, so that the first battery current is not greater than the first battery current threshold [0041, 0053, & 0054]. Regarding claim 16, Kristjansson discloses the auxiliary current control circuit as claimed in claim 15, wherein the current adjustment circuit is configured to operably adjust the charging current according to the first battery current as well as the first battery current threshold, so that the first battery current is not greater than the first battery current threshold [0041, 0053, & 0054]. With respect to claims 2, 11, & 16, the teachings of Kristjansson have been discussed above. Kristjansson is silent with respect to explicitly disclosing wherein the step of adjusting the charging current is through executing a linear search algorithm or a binary search algorithm, as recited in claims 2, 11, & 16. Vilhauer teaches, regarding claims 2, 11, & 16, wherein the step of adjusting the charging current is through executing a linear search algorithm or a binary search algorithm [0020]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide the search algorithm features of Vilhauer within the system of Kristjansson for at least the benefit of providing for a more efficient means of determining the current setting, optimizing the charge rate, and reducing the risk of harmful effects from drawing current at levels higher than the capacity of the source [0021]. 5. Claims 6, 7, & 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kristjansson in view of Baruzzi et al. (US 2013/0158916 A1), hereinafter Baruzzi. With respect to claim 6, 7, 18, & 19, the teachings of Kristjansson have been discussed above. Kristjansson is silent with respect to explicitly disclosing wherein the current measurement circuit includes an analog-to-digital converter (ADC), and wherein the ADC is disposed inside a battery capacity gauge integrated circuit (IC), as recited in claims 6, 7, 18, & 19. Baruzzi teaches, regarding claims 6, 7, 18, & 19, wherein the current measurement circuit includes an analog-to-digital converter (ADC), and wherein the ADC is disposed inside a battery capacity gauge integrated circuit (IC) [0075-0079]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide the ADC features of Baruzzi within the system of Kristjansson for at least the benefit of improving efficiency and overall system operation [0077 & 0078]. Regarding claim 20, Kristjansson, as modified above, discloses the auxiliary current control circuit as claimed in claim 18, wherein the current adjustment circuit includes: a micro control unit (MCU) [0035 & 0043-0045]. 6. Claims 3, 12, & 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kristjansson in view of Hussain et al. (US 2008/0258688 A1), hereinafter Hussain. With respect to claim 3, 12, & 17, the teachings of Kristjansson have been discussed above. Kristjansson is silent with respect to explicitly disclosing adjusting the charging current back to the initial value of the charging current by the current adjustment circuit when the input power is absent, as recited by claims 3, 12, & 17. Hussain teaches, regarding claims 3, 12, & 17, adjusting the charging current back to the initial value of the charging current by the current adjustment circuit when the input power is absent [0028-0030]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide the adjusting features of Hussain within the system of Kristjansson for at least the benefit of optimizing battery cell capacity by preventing damage caused by inefficient charging [0004-0006]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAULTEP SAVUSDIPHOL whose telephone number is (571)270-1301. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F,7-3 EST. If the examiner cannot be reached by telephone, he can be reached through the following email address: paultep.savusdiphol@uspto.gov Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone and email are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas K. Pham can be reached on (571) 272-3689. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAULTEP SAVUSDIPHOL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2876
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 24, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749084
LOGICAL VALIDATION OF DEVICES AGAINST FRAUD AND TAMPERING
1y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749349
SECURITY, LUGGAGE TRACKING, AND MACHINE LEARNING MODELS
1y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743721
DEVICE FOR AIDING VISUALLY IMPAIRED OR BLIND PERSONS WHILE SHOPPING
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12731162
DETERMINATION OF COUNTERFEIT PRODUCTS VIA CERTIFIED QUICK RESPONSE CODES AND A TRUSTED PRODUCT CERTIFICATE AUTHORITY
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12718037
TRACKING AND AUTHENTICATION OF ASSET VIA DISTRIBUTED LEDGER
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+17.0%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 758 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month