Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/494,025

SIGNAL PROCESSING UNIT FOR INDUCTIVE POSITION SENSOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 25, 2023
Examiner
PREVIL, DANIEL
Art Unit
2685
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Renesas Electronics America Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1326 granted / 1547 resolved
+23.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1585
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
55.6%
+15.6% vs TC avg
§102
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1547 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5, 8-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rasbornig et al. (US 2022/0326002) in view of Moller et al. (US 2018/0202835). Regarding claim 1, Rasbornig discloses a signal processing unit for an inductive position sensor, wherein the inductive position sensor provides a first position signal and a second phase-shifted position signal, the signal processing unit (abstract) comprising: a first input for the first position signal and a second input for the second position signal (page 1, [0004]); an output for providing an AC excitation signal to the inductive position sensor (page 1, [0001]); an oscillator (rotor 180) connected to the output for generating the AC excitation signal (fig. 1-fig. 2; page 2, [0015-0017]). Rasbornig discloses all the limitations set forth above but fails to explicitly disclose a signal processor for calculating the position of a moving target of the position sensor from the first position signal and the second position signal; wherein: the signal processing unit comprises at least onc integrator for integrating an integer number of periods of the first position signal respectively an integer number of periods of the second position signal; and wherein the signal processor calculates the position of the moving target of the position sensor from the integrated first position signal and the integrated second position signal. However, Moller discloses a signal processor for calculating the position of a moving target of the position sensor from the first position signal and the second position signal (page 1, [0011]); wherein: the signal processing unit comprises at least onc integrator for integrating an integer number of periods of the first position signal respectively an integer number of periods of the second position signal (page 1, [0004]); and wherein the signal processor calculates the position of the moving target of the position sensor from the integrated first position signal and the integrated second position signal (page 1, [0011]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was so first filed to incorporate the features of Moller within the system of Rasbornig in order to determine the position of a moving body thereby increasing the reliability of the system. Regarding claim 2, Rasbornig discloses wherein the first position signal and the second phase-shifted position signal are analog signals; and the signal processing unit comprises an analog-to-digital converter for converting the first position signal and the second position signal to a corresponding first digital position signal and to a corresponding second phase-shifted digital position signal (page 3, [0024]). Regarding claim 3, Rasbornig discloses an oscillator controller for keeping the amplitude of the AC excitation signal in a predefined range (page 1, [0001]). Regarding claim 4, Rasbornig discloses wherein the inductive position sensor comprises at least one transmitter coil receiving the AC excitation signal, a first receiver coil providing the first position signal and a second receiver coil providing the second position signal (page 1, [0001-0002]). Regarding claim 5, Rasbornig discloses wherein the oscillator comprises an LC-oscillator (rotor in page 1, [0001]). Regarding claim 8, Rasbornig discloses wherein the signal processing unit provides low-pass filtering and calibration (measurement in page 1, [0004]). Regarding claim 9, Rasbornig discloses wherein the first input and the second input are connected to a first multiplexer (page 1, [0004]). Regarding claim 10, Rasbornig discloses wherein the first input and the second input are connected to an amplifier and/or rectifier (page 1, [0001]). Regarding claim 11, Rasbornig discloses wherein an output of the first multiplexer is connected to an amplifier and/or rectifier (page 1, [0001]). Regarding claim 12, Rasbornig discloses wherein the signal processing unit comprises a test signal generation unit for providing a test signal to the first multiplexer, wherein the test signal can have a variety of scaling factors (page 1, [0004]). Regarding claim 13, Rasbornig discloses wherein the first multiplexer provides a non- inverted signal and an inverted signal for each input (page 1, [0004]). Regarding claim 14, Rasbornig discloses wherein the signal processor applies a pseudo- synchronized interleafed sampling method to the multiplexed and integrated first position signal and second phase-shifted position signal (fig. 1-fig. 2). Regarding claim 15, Rasbornig discloses a peak detector for detecting the amplitude of the AC excitation signal provided to the output and a second multiplexer prior to the signal processor, wherein the AC excitation signal provided to the output is additionally provided to the first multiplexer and the signal processor compares the amplitude of the processed AC excitation signal provided to the first multiplexer with the detected amplitude of the peak detector provided to the second multiplexer (fig. 1-fig. 2). Regarding claim 16, Rasbornig discloses wherein the peak detector comprises an operational amplifier, a diode and an RC low-pass filter (page 1, [0004]). Regarding claim 17, Rasbornig discloses wherein the first position signal comprises a sine position signal and the second phase-shifted position signal comprises a cosine position signal (page 1, [0004]). Regarding claim 18, Rasbornig discloses wherein the oscillator comprises a current-driven or current-limited cross-coupled inverter circuitry (fig. 1-fig. 2). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: In combination with all the limitations in the claims, the prior arts fail to teach or make obvious: wherein the signal processor detects an offset in the integrated first position signal and/or an offset in the integrated second phase-shifted position signal and/or a gain mismatch between the integrated first position signal and the integrated second phase-shifted position signal; and the signal processor provides a corresponding negative compensation signal to the integrator for compensating the detected offset and/or a gain calibration signal for compensating the gain mismatch. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Fiori, Jr. (US 9,995,778) discloses sensor apparatus. Tupper et al. (US 2013/0181688) discloses system……..dc power. Kataoka (US 2013/0257223) discloses controlling device……….type actuator. Gluck (US 5,738,625) discloses method ….neural cells. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL PREVIL whose telephone number is (571)272-2971. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday from 9:30 AM -6:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wang Quan-Zhen can be reached at 571 272 3114. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DP January 20, 2026 /DANIEL PREVIL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2685
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 25, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602985
Crash Severity Detection System and Related Methods
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594951
AUDIBLE CUE SYSTEM FOR A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589195
HLM PUMP STOP REACTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12572322
Voice Prompt System, Voice Prompt Method for Bridge Girder Erection Unit, Computing Device, and Medium
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570212
OCCUPANT-LEFT-UNATTENDED WARNING DEVICE, OCCUPANT-LEFT-UNATTENDED WARNING SYSTEM, AND OCCUPANT-LEFT-UNATTENDED WARNING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+12.6%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1547 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month