Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/494,834

WATERPROOF ELECTROMAGNETIC DEVICE AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 26, 2023
Priority
Oct 26, 2022 — EU 22383032.4
Examiner
NGUYEN, TUYEN T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Premo S L
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1031 granted / 1263 resolved
+21.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+1.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
1310
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
56.5%
+16.5% vs TC avg
§102
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1263 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I, claims 1-8 in the reply filed on 7/10/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that method steps of Group II directed to the same inventive concept with manufacturing technique use to achieve of that device. This is not found persuasive because method technique such as “overmolding” step would require additional search and/or consideration in other areas, class/subclass. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mitsuyuki et al. [JP 2007-124458 A] in view of JP3846798A. Regarding claim 1, Mitsuyuki et al. disclose a waterproof electromagnetic device [coil antenna, figures 1-4], comprising: - a magnetic core [2] surrounded by at least one coil [3]; - an electronic circuit board [6] including at least connection pins [figures 2-3] electrically connected to the at least one coil [figures 2-3]; and - an enclosure [resin 7] overmolded on a waterproof manner surrounding the magnetic core, the at least one coil and the electronic circuit board [figures 2-3]. Mitsuyuki et al. disclose the instant claimed invention except for the magnetic core including protrusions. JP3846798A discloses a coil device for in-vehicle antenna [figure 1] comprising: - a magnetic core [1] including several protrusions [21, 22]; - at least one coil [4] wound about the center portion of the magnetic core; and - an enclosure structure [7] overmolded on a waterproof manner surrounding the magnetic core and the coil. It would have been an obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to use the magnetic core with protrusions for the magnetic core of Mitsuyuki et al., as suggested by JP3846798A, for the purpose of facilitating manufacturing and/or assembling. Regarding claim 2, JP3846798A discloses the protrusions extend from at least two opposed sides of the magnetic core. The specific protrusions arrangement would have been an obvious design consideration based on the intended applications and/or environments uses. Regarding claim 3, JP3846798A further disclose the magnetic having slot/groove [31, 32] provided to supporting/embedding connections. It would have been an obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the magnetic core of Mitsuyuki et al. to have slot or groove to supporting/embedding the circuit board, as suggested by JP3846798A, for the purpose of improving assembling/manufacturing and/or providing support for the circuit board. Regarding claim 4, Mitsuyuki et al. further discloses the connection pins electrically connected to exposed ends of electric cables [4], wherein the connection pins and the ends of electric cables being embedded in the enclosure and the electric cables extended outside the enclosure [figures 1-4]. Regarding claim 5, Mitsuyuki et al. further discloses the electric cable [4] including an sealing portion [or insulated coating] adjacent to one end of the waterproof electromagnetic device, not embedded in the enclosure and comprised between two portions of the cable embedded in the enclosure, each sealing portion being covered by waterproof and electrically insulating seal [resin 9, figures 2 and 4]. Regarding claim 6, Mitsuyuki et al. discloses the sealing portion of the electric cables placed in a cavity of the enclosure, wherein the cavity is filled with the resin [9, figures 2 and 4]. Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mitsuyuki et al. in view of JP3846798A, as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Dinter [US 2022/0196143 A1]. Mitsuyuki et al. in view of JP3846798A disclose the instant claimed invention except for a longitudinal groove. Dinter discloses a longitudinal groove [4] formed on an external surface of a housing structure [1] for accommodating cable [figure 1]. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to include a longitudinal groove on the external surface of the enclosure of Mitsuyuki et al., as modified, as suggested by Dinter, for the purpose of providing accommodating groove/slot for the electric cable. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 7 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record do not teach or disclose, in the claimed combination thereof, protrusion tips of the protrusions reaching the external surface of the enclosure or reaching the external surface of the enclosure and housed in a cavity defined in the external surface of the enclosure, are covered by waterproof and electrically insulating seal, or by a waterproof and electrically insulating seal made of resin. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUYEN T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1996. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached at 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUYEN T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 26, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749613
INDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744149
WOUND CORE
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738404
MULTILAYER COIL COMPONENT
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731723
INTEGRATED BOTTOM SUNKEN SURFACE MOUNT AND/OR SWING INDUCTOR AND FABRICATION METHODS
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12725726
INDUCTOR
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+1.2%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1263 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month