Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/495,065

BATTERY WAKE-UP CIRCUIT IN SERIES-PARALLEL BATTERY SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 26, 2023
Priority
Jan 10, 2023 — CN 202310038100.2
Examiner
TARDIF, DAVID P
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ari Energy (Huizhou) Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
380 granted / 528 resolved
+12.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
543
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
63.4%
+23.4% vs TC avg
§102
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
§112
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 528 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This action is responsive to claims filed 10/26/2023. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Priority claim to CN202310038100.02 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 1. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Tan (2011/0163723). As to claim 1: Tan teaches a battery wake-up circuit in a series-parallel battery system, comprising: a battery core assembly (106); a battery management assembly (110); a current-limiting charge-discharge switch assembly provided in series between the battery core assembly and a power output end (120); wherein a controlled end of the current-limiting charge-discharge switch assembly is connected to the battery management assembly (figure 1); a charge-discharge control and detection assembly connected to the battery management assembly (190 connected through 126, 136, 138, paragraph 0041 explaining that the different lines indicate different statuses of the battery pack, including charging and discharging); wherein the charge-discharge control and detection assembly is configured to detect a signal of a discharge switch and a signal of a charger-assisted power, and wake up the battery management assembly in response to detecting a valid signal (explained in paragraph 0041); and the battery management assembly after being waken up is configured to control the current-limiting charge-discharge switch assembly to realize an electrical connection between the battery core assembly and the power output end, thereby making a current limiting discharge from the battery core assembly to the power output end (paragraph 0041, “wake up signal 138”); and a wake-up detection assembly (170); wherein a detection end of the wake-up detection assembly is connected to one end or two ends of a current-limiting resistor in the current-limiting charge-discharge switch assembly (paragraph 0048, two resistors 290 and 291 as seen in figure 2 of element 170 in greater detail); and an output end of the wake-up detection assembly is connected to the battery management assembly (170 connected to 110 directly); the wake-up detection assembly is configured to detect a one-end voltage at the one end of the current-limiting resistor or a two-ends voltage difference between the two ends of the current-limiting resistor (paragraph 0048 explains that the voltage is determined within a threshold based on the RC circuit of 291 and 294); and in response to that the one-end voltage or the two-ends voltage difference reaches a preset voltage, the wake-up detection assembly is further configured to output a wake-up detection signal to wake up the battery management assembly which is connected to the wake-up detection assembly (paragraph 0063 further explaining the voltage protection setting of element 170, wherein the threshold setting of voltage kick starts current flow via a wake up signal). As to claim 2: Tan teaches that the current-limiting charge-discharge switch assembly comprises the current-limiting resistor (291), a switch transistor (293) and a relay; a first end of the current-limiting resistor is connected to the power output end, and a first end of the switch transistor is connected to one end of the relay; a second end of the switch transistor is connected to a second end of the current-limiting resistor, and a controlled end of the switch transistor is connected to the battery management assembly (elements seen in figure 2, element 190a); the other end of the relay is connected to the battery core assembly (292). Allowable Subject Matter 2. Claims 3-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record does not fairly teach or suggest the limitations of claim 3, specifically a parallel wake-up circuit in series-parallel with the battery system, which in the parallel wake-up assembly outputs a parallel wake-up detection signal to wake up the battery management assembly, in view of all other limitations present in the claims. The prior art teaches a number of battery assemblies which are similar to the independent claims, but none of those applications teach a secondary power-up or wake-up element. Wang (2020/0348365), Li (2017/0187207), Snyder (2015/0180257) and Tan (2011/0163723) are all examples of battery configurations with wake-up circuits coupled with a switch and a management unit, with a charge/discharge mediator, connected in the specific manner as required by claim 1. Snyder and Tan further teach the specifics of the resistor configurations attached to the wake-up circuit. However, none of these references teach two wake-up circuits that would output a parallel signal. Li (2022/0149643) teaches a coupled and parallel configured wake-up circuit configuration. However, Li is silent as to other limitations of the location of the resistors in the wake-up circuit element. If one was motivated to combine Li outright with Tan or another reference listed above, it would be unobvious how to flatly implement the double wake-up circuit, as the controller in Tan, and all of the other references, are suited to receive a single signal for a wake-up event. In Tan, specifically, the wake-up circuit can transmit multiple different signals across the line depending on the voltage threshold determined, but this is not the same as having multiple individual elements which wake up the device. Motivation for this combination would be lacking in this situation, and it would take a rework of the circuit, which generally requires strong and obvious motivation. Examiner contends the same is true for In re Harza duplication of parts (MPEP 2144.04), wherein the combination would not be simple. As is such, examiner objects to claim 3. Claims 4-7 depend upon claim 3, and are similarly objected to. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID P TARDIF whose telephone number is (571)270-7810. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 11AM-7:30PM. If the examiner cannot be reached by telephone, he can be reached through the following email address: david.tardif@uspto.gov If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone and email are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Pham can be reached on (571)272-3689. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. DAVID TARDIF Examiner Art Unit 2876 /DAVID TARDIF/ Examiner, Art Unit 2876 david.tardif@uspto.gov /THOMAS K PHAM/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2876
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 26, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 22, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12727964
GLASS TAG TRANSPONDER INSTALLATION/RETROFITTING FOR MOTOR CABLE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722528
BI-CAPACITOR DESIGN FOR FAST STATE OF CHARGE EQUALIZATION
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725002
AN RFID TRANSPONDER, A POD AND A METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE POD
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12718050
HARDWARE AND DEEP LEARNING BASED AUTHENTICATION THROUGH ENHANCED RF FINGERPRINTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12706370
RFID ANTENNA FOR REJECTING UNWANTED RF SIGNALS
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+10.3%)
3y 0m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 528 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month