Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/496,075

INTERACTIVE PET TOY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 27, 2023
Priority
Oct 27, 2022 — provisional 63/381,153
Examiner
ALEKSIC, NEVENA
Art Unit
3647
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
T F H Publications Inc.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
84 granted / 113 resolved
+22.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
132
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
88.8%
+48.8% vs TC avg
§102
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§112
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 113 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-8, and 10-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 17 recite “wherein, in the second configuration, both the second configuration projecting surface and the second configuration recessed surface are exposed as to be contactable by the teeth of the animal to apply the force to the at least one flexible insert”. However, examiner notes, the originally filed specification never discloses that the “second configuration projecting surface and the second configuration recessed surface are exposed as to be contactable by the teeth of the animal”. As set forth in Para. [0033] of the instant invention, the teeth of the pet can apply a force on the projection surface 14P which is illustrated in the first configuration 12a in at least figs. 2-3. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NEVENA ALEKSIC whose telephone number is (571)272-1659. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:30am-5:30pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kimberly Berona can be reached at (571)272-6909. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /N.A./Examiner, Art Unit 3647 /Christopher D Hutchens/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Feb 05, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 24, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 22, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Nov 12, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 29, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635668
SNUFFLE TOY
1y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12622417
CAT WAND
2y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12616171
ANIMAL GROOMING TOOL AND METHODS
1y 6m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12616172
SECOND SKIN PAW PROTECTORS
1y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12595082
ThermaSat Solar Thermal Propulsion System
4y 6m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 113 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month