Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/496,118

VEHICLE REINFORCING MEMBER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 27, 2023
Examiner
BUTCHER, CAROLINE N
Art Unit
3676
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kia Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
634 granted / 782 resolved
+29.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
820
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
46.6%
+6.6% vs TC avg
§102
23.6%
-16.4% vs TC avg
§112
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 782 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This action is a first action on the merits. The claims filed on October 27, 2023 have been entered. Claims 1-20 have been entered. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. This application claims foreign priority to Republic of Korean Application No. KR10-2023-0092614 filed on July 17, 2023. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed on October 27, 2023 has been considered by the Examiner. Specification Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. The abstract should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, “The disclosure concerns,” “The disclosure defined by this invention,” “The disclosure describes,” etc. In addition, the form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “means” and “said,” should be avoided. The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because the recitation of “An embodiment” in line 1 is considered an implied phrase. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shimizu, Japanese Patent Application No. 2008/247364 (hereinafter Shimizu) (all citations are to the English translation dated 2026). Claim 1: Shimizu discloses a vehicle reinforcing member (partition front bar 10) comprising: a first extension portion (one of the pair of metal round pipes 12) extending to a predetermined length (as shown in Fig 1-2); a second extension (the other of the pair of metal round pipes 12) portion spaced apart from the first extension portion (12); a first upper mounting portion disposed at a top end of the first extension portion (left upper mounting portion 42 located at the upper end of one of the pair of metal round pipes 12 as shown in Fig 1-2) and a second upper mounting portion disposed at a top end of the second extension portion (right upper mounting portion 42 located at the upper end of the other of the pair of metal round pipes 12 as shown in Fig 1-2); and a first lower mounting portion disposed at a bottom end of the first extension portion (left lower attachment portion 52 located at the lower end of one of the pair of metal round pipes 12 as shown in Fig 1-2) and a second lower mounting portion disposed at a bottom end of the second extension portion (right lower attachment portion 52 located at the lower end of the other one of the pair of metal round pipes 12 as shown in Fig 1-2). Claim 14: Shimizu discloses a vehicle comprising: a vehicle body comprising a partition (partition front panel 5 and partition board 8) disposed between compartments of the vehicle (rear surface of the back seat 3 and luggage compartment side), wherein the partition (5/8) comprises an upper portion (partition front panel 5) extending in a width direction (left to right) of the vehicle body and a pair of side portions (sides of partition board 8) disposed at each end of the upper portion (5) (sides of partition board 8 are attached at the ends of partition front panel 5 as shown in Fig 1); a first extension portion (one of the pair of metal round pipes 12) extending to a predetermined length (as shown in Fig 1-2); a second extension (the other of the pair of metal round pipes 12) portion spaced apart from the first extension portion (12); a first upper mounting portion disposed at a top end of the first extension portion (left upper mounting portion 42 located at the upper end of one of the pair of metal round pipes 12 as shown in Fig 1-2) and mounted on the upper portion (5) of the partition (5/8) (as shown in Fig 1-2); a second upper mounting portion disposed at a top end of the second extension portion (right upper mounting portion 42 located at the upper end of the other of the pair of metal round pipes 12 as shown in Fig 1-2) and mounted on the upper portion (5) of the partition (5/8) (as shown in Fig 1-2); first upper connection portion (left upper mounting portion 22 located at the upper end of one of the pair of metal round pipes 12 as shown in Fig 1-2) connecting the top end of the first extension portion (22) to the first upper mounting portion (left upper mounting portion 42) (see Fig 1-2); a second upper connection portion (right upper mounting portion 22 located at the upper end of the other of the pair of metal round pipes 12 as shown in Fig 1-2) connecting the top end of the second extension portion (22) to the second upper mounting portion (right upper mounting portion 42) (see Fig 1-2); a first lower mounting portion (left lower attachment portion 52) disposed at a bottom end of the first extension portion (12) and mounted on a first side portion (left side of partition board 8) of the pair of side portions of the partition (5/8) (as shown in Fig 1-2); and a second lower mounting portion (right lower attachment portion 52) disposed at a bottom end of the second extension portion (12) and mounted on a second side portion (right side of partition board 8) of the pair of side portions of the partition (5/8) (as shown in Fig 1-2). Claims 2 and 15: Shimizu discloses wherein the first extension portion (one of the pair of metal round pipes 12) is spaced apart from the second extension portion (the other of the pair of metal round pipes 12) along a longitudinal axis of a vehicle body (axis extending from the front to the rear of vehicle) (one metal round pipe 12 is placed on top of the other metal round pipe 12, as shown in Fig 1-2). Claims 3 and 16: Shimizu discloses wherein the first extension portion (one of the pair of metal round pipes 12) is spaced apart from the second extension portion (the other of the pair of metal round pipes 12) along a width axis of a vehicle body (axis extending from the left to the right of vehicle) (top end of one of the pair of metal round pipes 12 is located above the bottom end of the other one of the round metal pipes 12, as shown in Fig 1-2). Claims 4 and 17: Shimizu discloses wherein the first extension portion (one of the pair of metal round pipes 12) is spaced apart from the second extension portion (the other of the pair of metal round pipes 12) along a height axis of a vehicle body (axis extending from the top to the bottom of the vehicle) (top end of one of the pair of metal round pipes 12 is spaced from the top end of the other one of the round metal pipes 12, as shown in Fig 1-2). Claims 5 and 18: Shimizu discloses further comprising a middle connection portion (point at which round metal pipes 12 intersect, a bolt/ fastener hole appears to be present as shown in Fig 1-2) connecting the first extension portion (one of the pair of metal round pipes 12) and the second extension portion (the other of the pair of metal round pipes 12, Fig 1-2). Claim 6: Shimizu discloses wherein: the first upper mounting portion (left upper mounting portion 42) is offset with respect to the top end of the first extension portion (top of 12) (42 is offset or spaced from 12 by left upper mounting portion 22 as shown in Fig 1-2); and the second upper mounting portion (right upper mounting portion 42) is offset with respect to the top end of the second extension portion (top of 12) (42 is offset or spaced from 12 by right upper mounting portion 22 as shown in Fig 1-2). Claim 7: Shimizu discloses wherein further comprising: a first upper connection portion (left upper mounting portion 22 located at the upper end of one of the pair of metal round pipes 12 as shown in Fig 1-2) connecting the top end of the first extension portion (22) to the first upper mounting portion (left upper mounting portion 42) (see Fig 1-2); and a second upper connection portion (right upper mounting portion 22 located at the upper end of the other of the pair of metal round pipes 12 as shown in Fig 1-2) connecting the top end of the second extension portion (22) to the second upper mounting portion (right upper mounting portion 42) (see Fig 1-2). Claim 8: Shimizu discloses wherein: a cross section of the first upper connection portion (left upper mounting portion 22) gradually changes from the top end of the first extension portion (12) toward the first upper mounting portion (42) (as shown in Fig 1-2); and a cross section of the second upper connection portion (right upper mounting portion 22) gradually changes from the top end of the second extension portion (12) toward the second upper mounting portion (42) (as shown in Fig 1-2). Claim 9: Shimizu discloses wherein: the first lower mounting portion (left lower attachment portion 52) is offset with respect to the bottom end of the first extension portion (metal pole 12) (52 is offset or spaced from 12 by left lower mounting portion 32 as shown in Fig 1-2); and the second lower mounting portion (right lower attachment portion 52) is offset with respect to the bottom end of the second extension portion (metal pole 12) (52 is offset or spaced from 12 by left lower mounting portion 32 as shown in Fig 1-2). Claim 10: Shimizu discloses further comprising: a first lower connection portion (left lower mounting portion 32) connecting the bottom end of the first extension portion (12) to the first lower mounting portion (left lower attachment portion 52) (as shown in Fig 1-2); and a second lower connection portion (right lower mounting portion 32) connecting the bottom end of the second extension portion (12) to the second lower mounting portion (right lower attachment portion 52) (as shown in Fig 1-2). Claim 11: Shimizu discloses wherein: a cross section of the first lower connection portion (left lower mounting portion 32) gradually changes from the bottom end of the first extension portion (12) toward the first lower mounting portion (left lower attachment portion 52) (as shown in Figs 1-2, best shown in Fig 2); and a cross section of the second lower connection portion (right lower mounting portion 32) gradually changes from the bottom end of the second extension portion (12) toward the second lower mounting portion (right lower attachment portion 52) (as shown in Figs 1-2, best shown in Fig 2). Claim 12: Shimizu disclose wherein: the first upper mounting portion (left upper mounting portion 42) and the second upper mounting portion (right upper mounting portion 42) are mounted on an upper portion (left an right upper mounting portions 42 of the front panel 5) of a partition (front panel 5 with partition board 8) of a vehicle body (as shown in Fig 1-2, pg 6); and the first lower mounting portion (left lower attachment portion 52) and the second lower mounting portion (right lower attachment portion 52) are mounted on respective side portions of the partition of the vehicle body (left and right lower attachment portions 52 are connected to partition 8, as shown in Fig 1-2, pg 6). Claim 13: Shimizu discloses wherein: each of the first upper mounting portion (left upper mounting portion 42) and the second upper mounting portion (right upper mounting portion 42) comprises first cylindrical hardware through which a first fastener extends (bolts or fasteners are shown extending through upper mounting portions 22 into 42 in Fig 1); and each of the first lower mounting portion (left lower attachment portion 52) and the second lower mounting portion (right lower attachment portion 52) comprises second cylindrical hardware through which a second fastener extends (bolts or fasteners are shown extending through lower mounting portions 32 into 52 in Fig 1). Claim 19: Shimizu discloses wherein: the first upper mounting portion (left upper mounting portion 42) is offset with respect to the top end of the first extension portion (top of 12) (42 is offset or spaced from 12 by left upper mounting portion 22 as shown in Fig 1-2); the second upper mounting portion (right upper mounting portion 42) is offset with respect to the top end of the second extension portion (top of 12) (42 is offset or spaced from 12 by right upper mounting portion 22 as shown in Fig 1-2); a cross section of the first upper connection portion (left upper mounting portion 22) gradually changes from the top end of the first extension portion (12) toward the first upper mounting portion (42) (as shown in Fig 1-2); and a cross section of the second upper connection portion (right upper mounting portion 22) gradually changes from the top end of the second extension portion (12) toward the second upper mounting portion (42) (as shown in Fig 1-2). Claim 20: Shimizu discloses further comprising: a first lower connection portion (left lower mounting portion 32) connecting the bottom end of the first extension portion (12) to the first lower mounting portion (left lower attachment portion 52) (as shown in Fig 1-2), wherein a cross section of the first lower connection portion (left lower mounting portion 32) gradually changes from the bottom end of the first extension portion (12) toward the first lower mounting portion (left lower attachment portion 52) (as shown in Figs 1-2, best shown in Fig 2); and a second lower connection portion (right lower mounting portion 32) connecting the bottom end of the second extension portion (12) to the second lower mounting portion (right lower attachment portion 52) (as shown in Fig 1-2), wherein a cross section of the second lower connection portion (right lower mounting portion 32) gradually changes from the bottom end of the second extension portion (12) toward the second lower mounting portion (right lower attachment portion 52) (as shown in Figs 1-2, best shown in Fig 2). Conclusion Claims 1-20 are rejected. No claims are allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CAROLINE N BUTCHER whose telephone number is (571)272-1623. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10-6 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tara E Schimpf can be reached at (571) 270-7741. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CAROLINE N BUTCHER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3676
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 27, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594900
STRUCTURAL MEMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595704
CASING DRILL BIT FACILITATING DRILL-OUT THEREOF, AND RELATED METHODS OF MANUFACTURE AND USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590525
DRILLING FRAMEWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590531
TENSION MONITOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584383
METAL SEAL FOR LINER DRILLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.5%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 782 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month