Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/496,194

CHARGER LATCH ASSISTING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 27, 2023
Priority
Feb 10, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0018310
Examiner
DIAO, M BAYE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Kia Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1269 granted / 1449 resolved
+27.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1471
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§103
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1449 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Acknowledgement is made of application #18/496,194 filed on 10/27/2023 in which claims 1-20 have been presented for prosecution in a first action on the merits. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 10/27/2023, 09/11/2024 and 01/05/2026 have been considered and put on record. Initialed copies are attached herewith. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over US 2020/0406470 to Herold et al., (Herold)(also cited by applicants) in view of Takeuchi et al., (Takeuchi) US 2010/0045715 Regarding the 102: Regarding claim 1: Herold at least discloses and shows in Figs. 11A-11B: A charger latch assisting device(see Figs. 11A-11B) comprising: a contactor(66)(see Fig. 11A) in contact with a latch button(18) of a charger(10)(see [0047]); an output clutch(61) coupled to the contactor(66) and movable in conjunction with the contactor(66)(note-globoid wheel 61 is mounted on the housing 21 so as to freely rotate on an axle 62 and is laterally provided with a bore through which an axle 63 is plug-fitted. This axle 63 couples a pair of legs 64 at the upper ends thereof to the globoid wheel 61; see [0047]); and an input clutch(construed as wheel 48) configured to move the output clutch(61) as the input clutch rotates(via actuating elements 59, worm gear 60) to press the latch button(18)(note-A wheel 48 in the center of the swing arm 54 is mounted so as to freely rotate by way of an axle 45 above the unlocking button 18 of the charger plug. The other end of the swing arm by way of an axle 43 is connected to a short spring bushing 58 in which a vertically aligned compression spring 57 lies. The upper end of the spring 57 lies in a counter bearing 69 which is connected to the housing 21. The spring 57 by way of the spring bushing 58 pushes the swing arm 54 toward the charger plug 10 and thus pushes the wheel 48 against the unlocking button 18 of the charger plug 10, on account of which the unlocking button 18 is activated; see [0048]). Regarding the 103: Herold teaches all the claimed limitations as set forth above but Herold does not expressly use the word “input clutch and output clutch” However Takeuchi discloses and shows in Fig. 3, factual evidence of the use of an input clutch (58a) and output clutch (58b)(see [0054]-[0056]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the input clutch and output clutch as disclosed in Takeuchi into the device of Herold for the advantages of enabling/disabling the transmission of driving force, as per the teachings of Takeuchi [0055]. Regarding claim 11, Herold or in the alternative as modified by Takeuchi discloses all the claimed invention as set forth and discussed above in claim 1. Modified Herold further discloses, wherein the contactor(61) and the output clutch(48)(Takeuchi; (58b)) are configured to vertically translate as the latch button(18) moves (see Herold; Figs. 11A-11B and [0047]-[0048]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 12-20 are allowed over the prior art of record. The prior art of record either taken alone or in combination thereof fails to teach or reasonably suggest, in the claimed combination: As in claim 12: A charger latch assisting device, the device comprising: a contactor in contact with a latch button of a charger; an output clutch coupled to the contactor and movable in conjunction with the contactor; an input clutch configured to move the output clutch as the input clutch rotates to press the latch button; an assisting housing configured to be fixed to the charger; and an elastic member having both ends connected to the assisting housing and the output clutch, respectively, and configured to swingably support the output clutch with respect to the assisting housing. As in claim 16: A charger latch assisting device, the device comprising: a contactor in contact with a latch button of a charger; an output clutch coupled to the contactor and configured to move in conjunction with the contactor, wherein the output clutch comprises: an output body coupled to the contactor; and an output protrusion protruding from the output body in a reference direction and configured to define an output groove together with the output body; an input clutch configured to move the output clutch as the input clutch rotates to press the latch button, wherein the input clutch comprises: an input body; and an input protrusion protruding from the input body in a direction opposite to the reference direction and inserted into the output groove to press the output protrusion in a state in which the input clutch rotates with the reference direction as an axial direction; and an elastic member having both ends connected to the input clutch and the output clutch, respectively, and configured to swingably support the output clutch with respect to the input clutch. Claims 13-15 depend either directly or indirectly from claim 12 and therefore are allowed for the same reasons. Claims 17-20 depend directly from claim 16 and therefore are allowed for the same reasons. Claims 2-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 2, patentability exists at least in part with the claimed limitations of, “wherein the output clutch comprises: an output body coupled to the contactor; and an output protrusion protruding from the output body in a reference direction and configured to define an output groove together with the output body”. Claims 3-6 depend either directly or indirectly from claim 2 and thus are allowable for the same reasons. Regarding claim 7, patentability exists at least in part with the claimed limitations of, “wherein the input clutch comprises: an input body coupled to the contactor; and an input operator coupled to the input body and comprising an electromagnet”. Claims 8-9 depend either directly or indirectly from claim 7 and thus are also allowable for the same reasons. Regarding claim 10, patentability exists at least in part with the claimed limitations of, “ the device further comprising an elastic member having both ends connected to the input clutch and the output clutch, respectively, and configured to swingably support the output clutch with respect to the input clutch”. Citation of Prior art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. USPAT 6,095,270 to Ishikawa discloses a battery carrier lock for electric power assisted vehicle. USPAT 5,248,264 to Long et al., (Long) discloses the general state of the art regarding a latch assembly and carrier for a portable product. USPAT 4,734,049 to George et al., (George) discloses a mechanical latch mechanism for combination portable transceiver and charging unit. US 2018/0347643 A1 to Itomi discloses a locking-type reverse input blocking clutch. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to M'BAYE DIAO whose telephone number is (571)272-6127. The examiner can normally be reached M-F; 10:00AM-6:30PM and OFF most of the time Friday when working IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DREW A DUNN can be reached at 571-272-2312. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. M'BAYE DIAO Primary Examiner Art Unit 2859 /M BAYE DIAO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859 July 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 27, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700743
CHARGING APPARATUS
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700741
Battery Booster
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700620
BATTERY PACK, POWER TOOL SYSTEM, AND CHARGING SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695318
POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695317
BALANCING METHOD OF A SWITCHABLE BATTERY DEVICE BY SHORT-CIRCUITING OF ITS OUTPUT
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+3.2%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1449 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month