Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/496,282

Agitator Configuration for Modular Dispensers

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Oct 27, 2023
Examiner
RANDALL, JR., KELVIN L
Art Unit
3651
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Cvs Pharmacy Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
63%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allow Rate
380 granted / 850 resolved
-7.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
900
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
56.3%
+16.3% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§112
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 850 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I: Species III and Group II: Species II in the reply filed on 10/13/2025 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6, 7, and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 6, 7, and 18 recite “wherein the at least one arm comprises at least a second arm extending away from the long axis of the at least one fin.” It is unclear as to what is being claimed. Claim 18 appears to claim that one fin has two arms extending away from the fin’s long axis. Such is not supported by the specification or drawings which describes multiple fins having multiple arms which extend away from their corresponding long axis of their individual fins. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 8, 10, and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Suhjun Park (US 2020/0022875 A1 – hereinafter Park). Re Claim 1: Park discloses a modular dispenser, comprising: a cartridge (116) configured to hold a plurality of pills, the cartridge (116) comprising an opening (at 170) through which at least one pill is configured to pass under an influence of gravity and a perimeter that extends around the opening (see Fig. 2); a dispensing base (100, 120, 123) configured to removably receive the cartridge (116) (see Fig. 3), the dispensing base (100, 120, 123) comprising a funnel (183) with a funnel inlet (near 188) proximate the opening (at 170) of the cartridge (116) and a funnel outlet (near 121) spaced apart from the funnel inlet (near 188); and a dispensing assembly (123) rotatably coupled to the dispensing base (100, 120, 123), the dispensing assembly (123) comprising: an arc surface (123a, 147) coupled to and spaced radially apart from a hub (125) about which the dispensing assembly (123) rotates, wherein the arc surface (123a, 147) comprises at least one fin (at 140) extending radially away from the arc surface (123a, 147), wherein the at least one fin (at 140) comprises a long axis (vertical extension extending away from arc surfaces) and at least one arm (127) extending laterally away from the long axis (vertical extension) of the at least one fin (at 140); and, at least one catch (123, 123b, 124) configured to receive the at least one pill when the at least one catch (123, 123b, 124) is proximate the funnel outlet (near 121) and to rotate the at least one catch (123, 123b, 124) away from the funnel outlet (near 121) to a position from which the at least one pill is retrievable by a user (see Figs. 1-57). Re Claim 2: Park discloses wherein the dispensing assembly (123) is configured to rotate in a plane perpendicular to a width of the dispensing base (100, 120, 123) (see Figs. 3-9). Re Claim 3: Park discloses wherein the at least one fin (at 140 – see Fig. 3) extends through a slot in a well (near 127a – recessed area) of the funnel (183). Re Claim 8: Park discloses wherein the at least one arm (127) extends in a direction parallel to a chord (width) of the at least one fin (at 140) (see Fig. 3). Re Claim 10: Park discloses wherein a funnel (at 190) comprises at least one flipper (160) movably retained within the funnel (at 190) (see Fig. 24). Re Claim 17: Park discloses a dispensing assembly (123) for use with a dispensing base (100, 120, 123) configured to dispense at least one pill under an influence of gravity, the dispensing assembly (123), comprising: an arc surface (123a, 147) coupled to and spaced radially apart from a hub (125) about which the dispensing assembly (123) rotates, wherein the arc surface (123a, 147) comprises at least one fin (at 140) extending radially away from the arc surface (123a, 147) (see vertical extension extending away from arc surfaces), wherein the at least one fin (at 140) comprises a long axis (vertical extension) and at least one arm (127) extending laterally away from the long axis (vertical extension) of the at least one fin (at 140); and, at least one catch (123, 123b, 124) configured to receive the at least one pill (see Figs. 2-9) (see Figs. 1-57). Claim(s) 19 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by James Arric (US 2019/0326006 A1 – hereinafter Arric). Re Claim 19: Arric discloses a flipper (241) for use with a funnel (208) in a dispensing base configured to dispense at least one pill under an influence of gravity, the flipper (241) comprising: an opening (243); and a chute (138) that extends away from a lower surface of the flipper (241) and the opening (243), wherein the flipper (241) is configured to be: movably retained within the funnel (see Fig. 1A); and agitated (rotation would cause flipper/pills to move) as a dispensing assembly (139) in the dispensing base moves relative to the funnel (208) (see Figs. 1A and 2B) (see Figs. 1-18). Re Claim 20: Arric discloses wherein the flipper (241) comprises at least one strake (244) that extends away from a lower surface of the flipper (241) (see Fig. 2A). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4-6 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Park in view of Carl A. Witt (2,207,528 – hereinafter Witt). Re Claims 4-6: Park discloses the device of claim 1, but fails to teach wherein the at least one fin comprises a plurality of fins, wherein each fin of the plurality of fins is spaced laterally apart from each other, and wherein the at least one arm comprises at least a second arm extending away from the long axis of the at least one fin. Witt teaches wherein the at least one fin comprises a plurality of fins (22, 23). Re Claim 5: Witt teaches wherein each fin of the plurality of fins (22, 23) is spaced laterally apart from each other. Re Claim 6: Witt teaches wherein the at least one arm (notched section near 25) comprises at least a second arm (duplicated for fin sections 22 and 23) extending away from a long axis of the at least one fin (22, 23) (see Figs. 3-5). Therefore, it would have been obvious, before the effective filing date of the invention, to have been motivated to combine the teachings Park with that of Witt to allow for holding objects of an elongated variety. Re Claim 18: Park discloses the device of claim 17, but fails to teach wherein the at least one arm comprises at least a second arm extending away from the long axis of the at least one fin. Witt teaches wherein at least one arm (notched section near 25) comprises at least a second arm (duplicated for fin sections 22 and 23) extending away from a long axis of the at least one fin (22, 23) (see Figs. 3-5). Therefore, it would have been obvious, before the effective filing date of the invention, to have been motivated to combine the teachings Park with that of Witt to allow for holding objects of an elongated variety. Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Park in view of Akdogan et al. (US 10,160,588 B2 – hereinafter Akdogan). Re Claim 9: Park discloses the device of claim 1, but fasil to teach wherein the at least one arm comprises at least one arm end with a slope. Akdogan teaches wherein at least one arm (at 706) comprises at least one arm end with a slope (see sloped triangular shape) (see Figs. 7A-7B). Therefore, it would have been obvious, before the effective filing date of the invention, to have been motivated to combine the teachings Park with that of Akdogan to allow for guiding product. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KELVIN L RANDALL, JR. whose telephone number is (571)270-5373. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:00 am-5 pm est. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gene Crawford can be reached at 571-272-6911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /K.L.R/Examiner, Art Unit 3651 /GENE O CRAWFORD/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3651
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 27, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112
Mar 25, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592115
HANDS-FREE VENDING MACHINE AND DOOR OPENING ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12545482
Structure for Sealing and Dispensing Cleaning Articles
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12525087
CUP DISPENSER SENSOR FOR AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING REFILL ALERTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12507839
FRICTIONAL FEATURES FOR ROLLED SHEET PRODUCT DISPENSERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12492112
BEVERAGE DISPENSING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
63%
With Interview (+17.9%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 850 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month