Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/496,517

Support Wheels for a Pickup Header

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 27, 2023
Examiner
PERRY, MONICA L
Art Unit
3644
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Cnh Industrial Belgium N.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
68%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allow Rate
417 granted / 753 resolved
+3.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
762
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
44.5%
+4.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 753 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 13-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 13 requires a control system having controllers configured to receive a signal, but it is unclear where that data is coming from, determining a position however it is unclear how the position is determined from what data source and by what means, and issuing a control signal to move to a second position however it is unclear how a second position is determined. Claim 14 requires receiving a signal indicative of a mode of operation but it is unclear how the mode is determined and what is generating the signal or how the controller is signaled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Vermander US 2025/0151654. In re claim 1, with reference to Figure 2, Vermander discloses, a pickup assembly for an agricultural harvester, the pickup assembly comprising: a pickup assembly frame comprising a forward portion and a rearward portion; at least one support wheel arm that is pivotally connected to the rearward portion of the pickup assembly frame; a pair of gauge wheels rotatably attached to the forward portion of the pickup assembly frame; and at least one support wheel rotatably attached to the support wheel arm. In re claim 2, with reference to Figure 2, Vermander discloses the at least one support wheel comprises a pair of support wheels, wherein the at least one support wheel arm comprises a pair of support wheel arms that are pivotally connected to the rearward portion of the pickup assembly frame, wherein the pair of support wheels are respectively attached to respective ones of the pair of support wheel arms. In re claim 3, with reference to Figure 2, Vermander discloses a length-adjustable arm, wherein the at least one support wheel arm is pivotally attached to the pickup assembly frame proximate a first end of the at least one support wheel arm and pivotally connected to the length-adjustable arm proximate a second end of the at least one support wheel arm, wherein the length-adjustable arm is pivotally connected to the pickup assembly frame. In re claim 4, with reference to Figure 2, Vermander discloses the at least one support wheel arm comprises a bend located between the first and second ends of the at least one support wheel arm. In re claim 5, with reference to Figure 2, Vermander discloses the at least one support wheel is rotatably attached to the at least one support wheel arm proximate the bend. In re claim 6, with reference to Figure 2, Vermander discloses the length-adjustable arm is pivotally connected to the pickup assembly frame at a position spaced from the pivotal connection between the at least one wheel arm and the pickup assembly frame. In re claim 7, with reference to Figure 2, Vermander discloses a suspension arrangement coupling the at least one support wheel and the at least one support wheel arm to the pickup assembly frame, wherein the suspension arrangement comprises the length-adjustable arm. In re claim 8, with reference to Figure 2, Vermander discloses a support wheel actuator configured to move the at least one support wheel from a first position with respect to the pickup assembly frame to a second position with respect to the pickup assembly frame, wherein the support wheel actuator comprises the length-adjustable arm. In re claim 9, with reference to Figure 2, Vermander discloses a suspension arrangement coupling the at least one support wheel and the at least one support wheel arm to the pickup assembly frame. In re claim 10, with reference to Figure 2, Vermander discloses a support wheel actuator configured to move the at least one support wheel from a first position with respect to the pickup assembly frame to a second position with respect to the pickup assembly frame. In re claim 11, with reference to Figure 2, Vermander discloses an agricultural harvester . In re claim 12, with reference to Figure 2, Vermander discloses the harvester configured to support the pickup assembly in an operational position during a crop collection operation, and in a transport position during movement of the agricultural harvester from one crop collection location to another, wherein, when the pickup assembly is in the transport position, the at least one support wheel is adjustable from a retracted position in which it does not make contact with a ground surface, to an extended position in which it does make contact with the ground surface. In re claim 13, with reference to Figure 2, Vermander discloses a control system for controlling the at least one support wheel, the control system comprising one or more controllers configured to: receive a first signal indicative of a ground surface location; determine a support wheel deployment position based on the ground surface location; and issue a control signal to cause the support wheel actuator to move the at least one support wheel to the second position. In re claim 14, with reference to Figure 2, Vermander discloses the one or more controllers are further configured to: receive a second signal indicative of a mode of operation of the pickup assembly, wherein the second signal comprises a signal indicative of a first mode of operation indicative of use of the pickup assembly for crop collection, or a signal indicative of a second mode of operation indicative of transport of the agricultural harvester from one crop collection location to another; and determine the support wheel deployment position in dependence on the mode of operation. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MONICA L PERRY whose telephone number is (571)270-3113. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Collins can be reached at 571-272-6886. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MONICA L PERRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3644
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 27, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582052
PLANTING BOXES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569081
REMOVABLE PLANT HANGER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12557791
REARING-KEEPING FACILITY FOR REARING POULTRY ANIMALS, CORRESPONDING POULTRY ANIMAL HOUSE AND USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12551806
RIDE VEHICLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ENTITY SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12543662
APPARATUS FOR PLANT GROWTH EXPERIMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
68%
With Interview (+12.6%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 753 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month