Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/497,563

COOKTOP APPLIANCE PRECISION MODE WITH IMPROVED PRECISION COOKING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 30, 2023
Examiner
NORTON, JOHN J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Haier US Appliance Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
466 granted / 693 resolved
+7.2% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
733
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
72.0%
+32.0% vs TC avg
§102
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§112
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 693 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Objections Claims 5, 6, 19, and 20 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 5, line 8, should be amended to recite “the two or more intervening temperature bands” to recognize the antecedent basis for the limitation provided earlier in the claim. Claim 6, line 7, should be amended to recite “the less than two intervening temperature bands” to recognize the antecedent basis for the limitation provided earlier in the claim. Claim 19, lines 8–9, should be amended to recite “the two or more intervening temperature bands” to recognize the antecedent basis for the limitation provided earlier in the claim. Claim 20, line 8, should be amended to recite “the less than two intervening temperature bands” to recognize the antecedent basis for the limitation provided earlier in the claim. Claim Rejections — 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bach (US Pub. 2018/0010805). Claim 9: Bach discloses a method of operating a cooktop appliance (10), the cooktop appliance comprising a user interface (18), a heating element (22) positioned at a cooking surface (20) of the cooktop appliance, and a controller (30) in communication with a temperature sensor (26) configured to measure a temperature at a utensil (12, 11) heated by the heating element, the method comprising: receiving a precision cooking mode initiation signal and a setpoint temperature (¶ 32, “controller 30 may control the power provided to heating source 24 to regulate or modulate the heat output of heating source assembly 22, e.g., to a heat output level or desired cooking temperature selected by the user by means of user control 18 or to keep the temperature of cooking utensil 12 below a predetermined maximum temperature”); initiating the precision cooking mode in response to the precision cooking mode initiation signal, wherein the precision cooking mode comprises activating the heating element positioned at the cooking surface at a first power level (see ¶ 40 discussing “first control mode M1” and “PHS”), the first power level based on the setpoint temperature; monitoring the temperature at the utensil heated by the heating element during the precision cooking mode (¶ 41, “Controller 30 may monitor a temperature Tsensed of cooking utensil 12, e.g., by using temperature sensor 26 as described above”); inputting the monitored temperature into a closed loop control algorithm (the temperature monitoring discussed in ¶ 41, inter alia, clearly suggest feedback-based monitoring that qualifies as a closed loop control algorithm); determining an output of the closed loop control algorithm, the output comprising a request to operate the heating element at a second power level (506, see fig. 5 and ¶ 41); determining at least one of a time limit (506b and 506c, see fig. 5A and ¶¶ 49 and 50) and a rate of temperature change threshold (not shown) is satisfied after determining the output of the closed loop control algorithm; and operating the heating element at the second power level based on the output of the closed loop control algorithm and on the at least one of the time limit and the rate of temperature change threshold (508, see figs. 5 and 5A, and ¶¶ 41 and 50). Claim 10: Bach discloses that determining at least one of the time limit and the rate of temperature change threshold is satisfied after determining the output of the closed loop control algorithm comprises determining the time limit is satisfied (via 506b and 506c), wherein operating the heating element at the second power level is based on the output of the closed loop control algorithm and on the time limit (see fig. 5A and ¶¶ 49 and 50). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1–4, 7, 8, and 15–18 are allowed. Claims 5, 6, 19, and 20 would inherit allowability if rewritten or amended to overcome the objections set forth in this Office action. Claims 11–14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 1 and 15, Chen et al. (CN 110671726 A) is probably the closest prior art of record for disclosing the recognition of particular temperature bands, each of which is associated with a particular desired rate of temperature change that would govern a set firepower. However, Chen does not disclose adjusting the operation of the heating element based on the first temperature band and the second temperature band in response to determining the monitored temperature at the utensil is within the second temperature band. Claims 2–8 and 16–20 each depend from independent claims 1 and 15, respectively. Regarding claims 11–14 in general, although Bach discloses consideration of a rate of temperature change, it does not disclose a rate of temperature change threshold. Instead, Bach’s own time limit is itself based on the rate of temperature change. Adjusting heating element power based on temperature rate thresholds is generally known, but it would not have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify Bach by alternatively repurposing how it employs the temperature rate change it detects to initiate a second power level on that basis. Regarding claim 12 specifically, Bach’s second power level M2 may include reducing the power provided to the heating source to allow the temperature of the utensil to stabilize (¶ 42), but this does not mean that M2 is based on the monitored temperature decreasing, nor does Bach disclose waiting for a steady state temperature before starting M2. The limitations of claim 13 are not obvious from Bach, Chen, nor any other prior art of record. Claim 14 depends from claim 13. Billman et al. (US Pub. 2023/0152824) is relevant background art, but shares a common Applicant, and was and published less than one year before the filing date of this application. Berghuis et al. (US Pub. 2024/0049369) is similar. Bach (US Pub. 2018/0010804), Wang et al. (CN 114811666 A), Ren et al. (CN 114688573 A), Wang et al. (CN 114963246 A), He et al. (CN 114811683 A), Hashimoto et al. (JP 2013-164194 A), Müller et al. (BE 1028749 A), He et al. (CN 112754253 A), Lee et al. (US Pub. 2015/0211744), and Payne et al. (US Pat. 4,493,980) are also cited as relevant prior art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to John J. Norton whose telephone number is (571) 272-5174. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Edward (Ned) F. Landrum can be reached at (571) 272-8648. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN J NORTON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3761
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 30, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677977
NOODLE BOILING APPARATUS
4y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680494
POWER SYSTEMS AND ENCLOSURES HAVING AN IMPROVED COMPRESSOR DRIVE
4y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677980
COFFEE BREWING SYSTEM AND COFFEE MACHINE
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677860
FOODSTUFF MANUFACTURING SYSTEM, METHOD OF UTILIZING THE SAME AND FOOD PRODUCT FORMED THEREFROM
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12661731
SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO DESIGN PART WELD PROCESSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+29.0%)
3y 3m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 693 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month