Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/497,664

SECURITY ENHANCEMENT FOR COMPUTING DEVICE STATE CHANGE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Oct 30, 2023
Examiner
PERUNGAVOOR, VENKATANARAY
Art Unit
2492
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC
OA Round
4 (Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
896 granted / 1020 resolved
+29.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1050
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
§103
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§102
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
§112
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1020 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 4/24/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant argues that application executing on the device causes the blocking the device from automatically changing states is not taught by Wu. Wu discloses the applications being processed by GPU, DSP and AP and ISP that run and prevent changing of states as it uses up memory and processor loading functions see Par. 0078 & Par. 010. The user’s application is being executed or the content is being displayed prevents the changing of state see Par. 009 & Par. 0061. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by WO 2024183503 to Wu(based on priority filing in China on March 9, 2023). Regarding Claim 1, 12, 19, Wu discloses A system for identifying a bypass of a computing device state change, Wu discloses the system comprising: a processor; and a memory device that stores program code structured to cause the processor to: determine that a computing device is in an unlocked state(Abstract & Par. 008-0010, the screen protection change with different state like screen-off state, screen-on sate and screen protection state); determine that application executing on the computing device providing content to a user is causing blocking of the computing device from automatically changing from the unlocked state to a state in which a restriction of an access of data on the computing device exists(Abstract & Par. 008-0010, the screen protection change with different state like screen-off state, screen-on sate and screen protection state & Par. 009 & Par. 0061, application that user selected is displaying content prevent state change ); detect an idle period of the computing device(Par. 0155, the time period for transition); detect a proximity change of the user relative to the computing device, the proximity change based on a determination that a distance of the user relative to the computing device exceeds a threshold(Par. 0108-0111, the preset range of user is detected); and perform an action to remediate the blocking of the computing device from automatically changing from the unlocked state to the state in which the restriction of the access of data on the computing device exists state change based on the idle period and the proximity change(Par. 0019-0020, the user leaves an preset range the state transitions) . Regarding Claim 2, 13, Wu discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the action comprises generating a notification(Par. 0097, the user is notified by sound). Regarding Claim 3, 14, Wu discloses the system of claim 2, wherein the notification comprises one or more of:an audio notification;a visual notification;a text message;a voice message; or an email message(Par. 0097, the user is notified by sound). Regarding Claim 4, Wu discloses the system of claim 2, wherein the notification identifies the software computing component that is blocking the device state change of the computing device(Par. 0134-0137, control module maintains the screen-on state) Regarding Claim 5, 15, 20, Wu discloses the system of claim 2, wherein the program code is further structured to cause the processor to:receive a signal, in response to the notification, to override the blocking of the computing device from automatically changing from the unlocked state to the state in which the restriction of the access of data on the computing device exists (Par. 0147-0148, the state parameter for scree status). Regarding Claim 6, 16, Wu discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the application at least one of a video player application, a video game application, audio player application, or a web browser(Par. 178, video is played & Par. 0129 -0130, applications that run on GPU includes video and gaming applications). Regarding Claim 7, 17, Wu discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the action comprises automatically overriding the blocking of the computing device from automatically changing from the unlocked state to the state in which the restriction of the access of data on the computing device exists state change( Par. 0072 the transition between states ) Regarding Claim 8, 19, Wu discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the program code is further structured to cause the processor to:determine a sensitivity of data accessible on the computing device; andaccess a security policy to determine the action to remediate the blocking of the computing device from automatically changing from the unlocked state to the state in which the restriction of the access of data on the computing device exists(Par. 0071-0073, the transition between states). Regarding Claim 9, 20, Wu discloses the system of claim 8, wherein the program code is structured to cause the processor to determine the sensitivity of the data accessible on the computing device by at least one of:determining that a software component is executing via which the data is available;determining that the software component is logged in;determining that the data is rendered on a display device coupled to the computing device; or retrieving the sensitivity of the data from a data source(Par. 0011 & Par. 0167, the brightness is changed to 80% or 50%). Regarding Claim 10. Wu discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the action is selected from a plurality of actions based on the proximity change(Par. 0158, the user leaves an preset range the state transitions) . Regarding Claim 11. Wu discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the state the state in which the restriction of the access of data on the computing device exists change comprises one of:a standby mode change;a hibernation state change;a screensaver state change;a lock state change;a device shutdown state; or a log-off state action(Par. 0292-0293 & Par. 0021, the states of transition). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Venkat Perungavoor whose telephone number is (571)272-7213. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rupal Dharia can be reached on 571-272-3880. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VENKAT PERUNGAVOOR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2492 Email: venkatanarayan.perungavoor@uspto.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Oct 03, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Dec 16, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 16, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 05, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 24, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706915
SCALABLE AUTHENTICATION MANAGEMENT
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706735
ENCRYPTION KEY MANAGEMENT ACROSS MULTIPLE COMPUTING DEVICES
1y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12694156
SECURITY AUDITING AND REMOTE ATTESTATION VIA KERNEL-SIGNED METRICS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12694142
MEMORY ACCESS PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMPUTER DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695788
Machine-Learning Association of Application-Specific Flows within Encrypted QUIC
1y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+3.3%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1020 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month