Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/497,846

PACKAGING WITH SEALING MATERIALS HAVING DIFFERENT SEALING CONDITIONS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 30, 2023
Examiner
GERTH, KATIE L
Art Unit
3731
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Pregis LLC
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
212 granted / 281 resolved
+5.4% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
318
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§112
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 281 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Application Status This action is responsive to the claims filed 22 July 2025. Claims 1-19 are currently pending and being examined. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant's cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-6, 11-14, and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Borough (US 3,505,146). Claims 1 and 11: Borough teaches a method for forming a packaging container (3:64-67; 22-fig.2), comprising: providing one or more web layers (14, 15,16,17-fig.1) each comprising a first sealing material (dielectrically sealable thermoplastic film-fig.1; 3:4-7; crystalline vinylidene chloride copolymer-claim 3) disposed in a first region (20-fig.1) of the one or more web layers (3:11-14), and a second sealing material (heat sealable thermoplastic film-fig.1; polyethylene-claim 3) disposed in a second region (21-fig.1) of the one or more web layers (3:19-23), wherein the second sealing material is configured such that heating the second sealing material to a first temperature does not cause the second sealing material to seal (“The sealing zone is indicated generally at 19 and, because of the application of the high frequency energy, a seal or bond is formed at 20 between the layers 14 and 15. It has been found, however, that the application of such high frequency energy generates heat in amounts which is often inadequate for the purpose of heat-sealing together the layers 16 and 17 of thermoplastic film having a relatively low dielectric loss factor. Such heat-scalable layers can be effectively and easily heat sealed together at 21, however, by the application of heat thereto from a source located adjacent the inner-most layer of such film and extending generally in the sealing zone 19.” 3:11-23); overlaying the first regions of the one or more web layers web with each other (see fig.1 showing 14 and 15 overlaying each other; 3:4-11); overlaying the second regions of the one or more web layers with each other (see fig.1 showing 16 and 17 overlaying each other; 3:4-11), the overlying first and second regions cooperatively surrounding a cavity defined between the one or more web layers (see fig.2 showing 14 and 15 overlaying each other), the cavity being a packaging interior cavity configured to house an object to be shipped (3:64-67; 22-fig.2); and heating the first sealing material to the first temperature to seal together the first regions of the one or more web layers (3:11-14), the one or more web layers forming walls of the packaging container when the first regions are sealed to each other (22-fig.2), the walls cooperatively bounding at least a portion of the cavity (3-64-67; fig.5). Borough further teaches: Claim 2: The method of claim 1, wherein the second sealing material is further configured so that heating the second sealing material to a second temperature higher than the first temperature seals together the second regions of the one or more web layers and thereby seals the cavity (3:11-23; claim 6). Claim 3: The method of claim 1, further comprising folding the one or more web layers so that the first regions of the one or more web layers overlay each other (see fig.2 and 5 showing folding of the film layers and 14 and 15 overlaying each other) and the second regions of the one of the one or more web layers overlay each other (see fig.2 and 5 showing folding of the film layers and 16 and 17 overlaying each other). Claims 5 and 13: The method of claim 1, wherein the second temperature is a minimum sealing temperature for the second sealing material (claim 6; 450°F is a minimum temperature). Claims 6 and 14: The method of claim 1, wherein the first temperature is a maximum temperature for the first sealing material (3:11-14; said temperature reached by the high frequency energy is a maximum temperature for the sealing). Claim 12: The method of claim 11, wherein providing the one or more web layers comprises providing the one or more web layers comprising the second sealing material in an unsealed condition (3:11-23). Claim 19: Borough teaches a method for forming a packaging container (3:64-67; 22-fig.2), comprising: providing one or more web layers (14, 15,16,17-fig.1) each comprising a sealing material disposed in a first region of the one or more web layers (dielectrically sealable thermoplastic film-fig.1; 3:4-7; crystalline vinylidene chloride copolymer-claim 3; 20-fig.1), and a sealing material disposed in a second region of the one or more web layers (heat sealable thermoplastic film-fig.1; polyethylene-claim 3; 21-fig.1); overlaying the first regions of the one or more web layers web with each other (see fig.1 showing 14 and 15 overlaying each other; 3:4-11); overlaying the second regions of the one or more web layers with each other (see fig.1 showing 16 and 17 overlaying each other; 3:4-11), the overlying first and second regions cooperatively surrounding a cavity defined between the one or more web layers (3:64-67; 22-fig.2), the cavity being a packaging interior cavity that is configured to house an object to be shipped (3:64-67; 22-fig.2); heating the sealing material in the first regions of the one or more web layers to a first temperature to seal together (3:11-14) the first regions without causing the sealing material in the second regions to seal (“The sealing zone is indicated generally at 19 and, because of the application of the high frequency energy, a seal or bond is formed at 20 between the layers 14 and 15. It has been found, however, that the application of such high frequency energy generates heat in amounts which is often inadequate for the purpose of heat-sealing together the layers 16 and 17 of thermoplastic film having a relatively low dielectric loss factor. Such heat-scalable layers can be effectively and easily heat sealed together at 21, however, by the application of heat thereto from a source located adjacent the inner-most layer of such film and extending generally in the sealing zone 19.” 3:11-23), the one or more web layers forming walls of the packaging container when the first regions are sealed to each other, the walls cooperatively bounding at least a portion of the cavity (see 2 showing walls forming a cavity); and subsequently heating the sealing material in the second regions of the one or more web layers to a second temperature higher than the first temperature to seal together the second regions (3:1-23). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7-10 and 15-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Borough (US 3,505,146) in view of Getty (US 2019/0062028). Claims 7 and 15: Borough teaches the method of claim 1. Borough does not teach providing wherein providing the one or more web layers comprises providing at least one of the one or more web layers with a padding configured to provide cushioning to the object. However, Getty teaches providing one or more web layers (11a,11 b-fig.5) comprises providing at least one of the one or more web layers with padding (30-fig.5; ¶[0099]) configured to provide cushioning to the object (¶[0003]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the applicant's claimed invention, to modify the method of Borough, by adding padding between the layers, as taught by Getty, to protect the contents sealed between the layers. (Getty: ¶[0003]) Borough as modified by Getty further teaches: Claims 8 and 16: The method of claim 7, wherein providing the at least one of the one or more web layers (Getty: 11a,11b-fig.5) with the padding (Getty: 30-fig.5; ¶[0099]) configured to provide cushioning to the object comprises providing the padding disposed in an inter-wall cavity of the at least one of the one or more web layers (Getty: ¶[0099]). Claims 9 and 17: The method of claim 7, wherein providing the at least one of the one or more web layers (Getty: 11a,11b-fig.5) with padding (Getty: 30-fig.5; ¶[0099]) configured to provide cushioning to the object (Getty: ¶[0099]) comprises providing the at least one of the one or more web layers with padding that includes an expansion material (Getty: 30-fig.5; ¶[0099]). Claims 10 and 18: Borough teaches the method of claim 1. Borough wherein providing the one or more web layers comprises providing the one or more web layers each further comprising a substrate made of paper. However, Getty teaches one or more layers comprises a substrate made of paper (11d-fig.2; ¶[0093]-[0095]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the applicant's claimed invention, to modify the method of Borough, by having an outer layer of paper around the inside packaging layers, as taught by Getty, because paper can be pre-printed with the product and advertising material for the finish product, thus the packages will be ready to be filled immediately without further printing being required. (Getty: ¶[0093]) Allowable Subject Matter Claim 4 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks p. 8-10, filed 22 July 2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1 and 11 under 35 USC §102 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of 35 USC §102, Borough (US 3,505,146). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KATIE L GERTH whose telephone number is (303)297-4602. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9am-4pm (CT). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anna Kinsaul can be reached at (571)270-1926. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATIE L GERTH/Examiner, Art Unit 3731 /THOMAS M WITTENSCHLAEGER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 30, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jul 22, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600018
DRIVING TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595108
PAPERBOARD PROTECTIVE CORNER AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583087
DRIVING TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577005
MACHINE AND METHOD TO MANUFACTURE TUBULAR ELEMENTS WITH THE SHAPE OF A TRUNCATED CONE, IN PARTICULAR, OF THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569972
Adaptable Motor Control of Modular Power Tool
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+16.4%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 281 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month