Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/497,866

LOW-PROFILE SMART OUTLET

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 30, 2023
Priority
Oct 29, 2021 — provisional 63/273,650 +1 more
Examiner
LE, THANH TAM T
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Lunar Energy Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1233 granted / 1427 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1458
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.9%
+12.9% vs TC avg
§102
34.1%
-5.9% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1427 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 3-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fusselman (10,468,833). Regarding claim 1, Fussellman discloses a small outlet, comprising: a bridge portion (P, Fig. 10) comprising a set of prongs (100 and 102, Fig. 10) that are inserted into an existing outlet (18, Figs. 1 and 10) of an electrical receptacle (10); and a controlled outlet (19, Fig. 1) that is connected to the bridge portion via a controllable switch (70, Fig. 10); wherein the controlled outlet is wall-mounted adjacent to the electrical receptacle; and wherein electrical connection between the controlled outlet and the existing outlet is controllable via the controllable outlet. Regarding claim 3, Fig. 10 shows an electrical connectivity path (78) between a prong (102) comprised in the bridge portion and a portion of the switched outlet. Regarding claim 4, Fig. 10 shows the prong comprised in the bridge portion comprises a high voltage prong inserted into the existing outlet. Regarding claim 5, the portion of the controlled outlet comprises a high voltage contact. Regarding claim 6, the high voltage contact comprised in the controlled outlet is configured to receive a plug prong (not shown). Regarding claim 7, Fig. 10 shows the controllable switch is inline of the electrical connectivity path between the prong comprised in the bridge portion and the portion of the controlled outlet. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fusselman in view of Johnson et. (8,564,279). Regarding claim 8, Fusselman discloses the claimed invention as described above except for a microcontroller, wherein the microcontroller is configured to control the controllable switch that is inline of the electrical connectivity path. Johnson et al., Fig. 8 shows a microcontroller (808). It would have been obvious to modify Fusselman to have the microcontroller, as taught by Johnson et al. for better connection. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1and 3-8 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THANH TAM T LE whose telephone number is (571)272-2094. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdul Riyami can be reached at 571-270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THANH TAM T LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831 05/17/26 thanh-tam.le@uspto.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Dec 01, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 24, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 30, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 30, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 04, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12665367
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665350
Electromagnetic Electrical Connector System
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658641
Lever and Header Gear Tooth Engagement to Prevent Premature Connector Mating
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658643
FIRST CONNECTOR AND CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY WITH UNLOCKING SLIDER
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651864
Magnetically Coupled Circuits
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.8%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1427 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month