Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 24, 2026
Application No. 18/498,292

HEATING SMOKEABLE MATERIAL

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 31, 2023
Priority
Sep 06, 2011 — RU 2011136869 +6 more
Examiner
YAARY, ERIC
Art Unit
1755
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Nicoventures Trading Limited
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
649 granted / 879 resolved
+8.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
931
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
56.8%
+16.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
§112
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 879 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of application for patent in the United States. Claims 31-37 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Counts (US 5,144,962). Regarding claim 31, Counts teaches [Fig. 6; col. 6, l. 15-50] an apparatus for heating smokeable material comprising: a flavor generating medium 12 (body of smokeable material); a housing 18, wherein the housing contains: a heating chamber arranged to receive the body of smokeable material 12 (region in as shown in Fig. 6 where material 12 is located); a first heater 14 configured to apply heat to the body of smokeable material in a radially inward direction; and an energy source 16 electrically coupled to the first heater; and the apparatus further comprising, when the body of smokeable material is received in the heating chamber: a second heater 14’ configured to apply heat to the body of smokeable material 12 in a radially outward direction, wherein the length of the body of smokeable material 12 is approximately equal to the length of the second heater 14’ so that the second heater 14’ heats the body of smokeable material 12 along its whole length. It is noted that the cited section discloses heater 14’ as the heating element within material 12. Fig. 6 erroneously connects reference number 14’ to external heater 14. Regarding claim 32, Counts teaches the first heater comprises a ceramics heater [col. 4, l. 5-14]. Regarding claim 33, Counts teaches the first heater is an electrically-powered heater [col. 4, l. 58-61]. Regarding claim 34, Counts teaches the second heater 14’, the heating chamber and the body of smokeable material 12 extend along a central, longitudinal axis of the housing [Fig. 6]. Regarding claims 35-37, Counts teaches the apparatus further comprises a controller electronically connected to the energy source configured to control activation of the heaters [col. 4, l. 31-46]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 38-39 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Counts as applied to claim 31 above, and further in view of Robinson (US 2008/0092912). Counts does not teach the housing comprises a layer of thermal insulation which extends around the outside of the heating chamber. Robinson teaches a smoking article wherein the housing 20 comprises a layer of thermal insulation 400 which extends around the outside of the heating chamber 300, wherein the layer of thermal insulation comprises a tubular length of insulation located co-axially around the heating chamber [Fig. 3; 0112]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to apply this insulation to the apparatus of Counts to prevent the outer regions of the outer container from becoming unduly hot as suggested by Robinson [0112]. Claims 40-42 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Counts and Robinson as applied to claim 38 above, and further in view of Clearman (US 4,989,619). Modified Counts does not teach the claimed insulation materials. Clearman teaches a smoking article wherein thermal insulation comprises an aerogel (open cell porous material) or a polymer [col. 17, I. 52-59]. As this is a conventional thermal insulation material known in the art, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to use an aerogel as the thermal insulation of Robinson to achieve predictable results, i.e. insulating the apparatus. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERIC YAARY whose telephone number is (571)272-3273. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Philip Louie can be reached at (571)270-1241. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERIC YAARY/Examiner, Art Unit 1755
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Oct 15, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Feb 05, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Aug 17, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765592
AEROSOL DELIVERY DEVICE
4y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12765587
Nicotine-Free Formulations, Devices and Methods Thereof for Cessation of Smoking or Nicotine Replacement
3y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12757938
AEROSOL-GENERATING DEVICE HAVING MULTI-LAYER INSULATION
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757932
Aerosol Generating System and Method of Using Same
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757937
ELECTRONIC VAPOR PROVISION DEVICE
1y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+2.5%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 879 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month