Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/498,846

IMPACT TOOL INCLUDING AN ELECTRONIC CLUTCH

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Oct 31, 2023
Priority
Nov 01, 2022 — provisional 63/381,820
Examiner
WITTENSCHLAEGER, THOMAS M
Art Unit
3731
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation
OA Round
4 (Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
391 granted / 550 resolved
+1.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
586
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
69.1%
+29.1% vs TC avg
§102
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
§112
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 550 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Status This Office action is in response to the amendments filed 2/17/2026. Claims 1, 3-10, 12-19, and 21-23 are currently pending. Claims 1, 10, 15, and 21-23 have been amended. Claims 2, 11, and 20 have been previously canceled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1, 3-10, 12-19, and 21-23 have been rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding claim 1, the limitation “calculate if the load of the motor is increasing toward the electronic clutch threshold or decreasing away from the electronic clutch threshold” (emphasis added) comprises new matter not previously disclosed by the specification as originally filed. Paragraph 0043 of applicant’s written description discusses calculating the load of the motor. However, this paragraph simply discloses that the load of the motor is calculated to determine if the load is increasing or decreasing and then compare the load to a threshold. However, this is different than calculating if the load of the motor is increasing toward or decreasing away from the electronic clutch threshold. Paragraph 0043 also discusses that the tool may provide an indication that the load is nearing a threshold. However, this is also different since providing an indication is different that calculating if the load is increasing toward or decreasing away from the threshold. Finally, it is noted that paragraph 0043 discloses “The controller 200 may also use the speed of the motor 105 and the current of the motor to determine which trip torque threshold the motor is approaching.” This also is different than calculating if the load is increasing toward or decreasing away from the electronic clutch threshold. A limitation reciting a controller configured to “calculate if the load of the motor is increasing toward the electronic clutch threshold or decreasing away from the electronic clutch threshold” imposes a very specific requirement of taking into account if the load is in the direction toward or away from the clutch threshold. This very specific configuration of the controller is not disclosed in applicant’s specification. Therefore, this subject matter was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey that applicant had possession of the claimed invention when the application was filed. Claims 3-9 and 21 are rejection based on their inclusion of the subject matter of claim 1. Claims 10 and 15, and hence their dependent claims, include materially the same subject matter as discussed above and are rejected based on the same reasoning. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THOMAS M WITTENSCHLAEGER whose telephone number is (571)272-7012. The examiner can normally be reached MON-FRI: 9:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shelley Self can be reached at 571-272-4524. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THOMAS M WITTENSCHLAEGER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3731 3/18/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Feb 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 04, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 18, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 20, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 29, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 17, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 20, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637244
METHOD AND PACKAGING DEVICE FOR PRODUCING PACKAGING UNITS, AND APPLICATION HEAD FOR CORRESPONDING USE
1y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636847
INTELLIGENT CARTON BLANK ERECTING
1y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629801
IMPACT TOOL AND ANVIL WITH BLIND HOLE TOOL ELEMENT RETENTION
3y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12629910
OPENING AND SHAPING BOX BLANK OF PACKING BOX
1y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12611835
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR WRAPPING A CARDBOARD BOX
2y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 11m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 550 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month