Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/499,312

METHODS FOR SECURING A PAVEMENT MARKER

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Nov 01, 2023
Examiner
ADDIE, RAYMOND W
Art Unit
3671
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
PPG Industries Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1288 granted / 1589 resolved
+29.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1614
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.9%
+9.9% vs TC avg
§102
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
§112
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1589 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Drawings The objection to the drawings under 37 CFR 1.83(a) cited in the last Office Action; has been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lowe US 2009/0041541 in view of Wilkins et al. US 2018/0371704. Lowe discloses a method for securing a raised pavement marker (14) to a groove (16) in a pavement (12) by: Forming two-stage groove (10/16). Applying a suitable adhesive, or epoxy (30) to the groove (16) and, Placing the marker (14) into the suitable adhesive, as show in Fig 4, such that the suitable adhesive can flow around/above the anchor means (42), See fig. 1; [0025-27]. What Lowe does not disclose is the use of a polyamide resin. However, Wilkins et al. teach a method of applying a molten (340-450F) thermoplastic composition comprising polyamide resin, a rosin-modified ester, a modified gum rosin, a pigment, a wax, a plasticizer, inorganic filler, light stabilizer, antioxidant and EVA [0007]; the method comprising: Heating and mixing the thermoplastic mixture to a molten state. [0010] Spraying or extruding the molten thermoplastic material onto a roadway in the vicinity of longitudinal joint of roads, runways, sidewalks floors etc. [0031, 63-66, 0129]. Embedding a road marking material, such as paint or aggregate into the hot applied thermoplastic composition. [0130]. Wherein cure times of the cooling thermoplastic can be controlled to be tack free in 1-5 minutes. [0029]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to bond the marker of Lowe with a thermoplastic polyamide resin as taught by Wilkins et al. in order to minimize disruption to traffic. With respect to claims 7-11, 19, 20 Lowe discloses a method for securing a raised pavement marker (14) to a groove (16) in a pavement (12) by: Forming two-stage groove (10/16). Applying a suitable adhesive, or epoxy (30) to the groove (16) and, Placing the marker (14) into the suitable adhesive, as shown in Fig 4, such that the suitable adhesive can flow around and above the anchor means (42), Fig. 1; [0025-27]. What Lowe does not disclose is the use of a polyamide resin. However, Wilkins et al. teach a method of applying a molten (340-450F) thermoplastic composition comprising polyamide resin, a rosin-modified ester, a modified gum rosin, a pigment, a wax, a plasticizer, inorganic filler, light stabilizer, antioxidant and EVA. See [0007, 0035]; the method comprising: Heating and mixing the thermoplastic mixture to a molten state. [0010] Extruding the molten thermoplastic material in widths greater than that of a road marking, such as 6-12” onto a roadway in the vicinity of longitudinal joint of roads, runways, sidewalks floors etc. [0031, 63-66, 0129]. Embedding a road marking material, such as paint or aggregate into the hot applied thermoplastic composition. [0130]. Wherein cure times of the cooling thermoplastic can be controlled to be tack free in 1-5 minutes. [0029]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to extrude a hot thermoplastic polyamide resin taught by Wilkins et al. in multiple layers and multiple widths of the groove cut by Lowe in order to prevent cracking or spalling of the two-stage groove once the roadway has been returned to service. With respect to claims 12-17 Wilkins et al. teaches the exact thermoplastic compositions claimed. [0035-49]. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Response to Amendment Applicant's amendment to claims 2, 7, 10 has necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Conclusion 6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAYMOND W ADDIE whose telephone number is (571)272-6986. The examiner can normally be reached on m-f 7:30-12:30, then 6-9pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chris Sebesta can be reached on 571-272-0547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you need help from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAYMOND W ADDIE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3671 9/13/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 01, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 24, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 30, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746454
Sports Field and Methods for Forming and Operating the Same
5y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747544
HIGH-PRODUCTION TRUSS-MOUNTED SCREED ASSEMBLY
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747367
PCM COATING ON THE FILLER MATERIAL
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742300
MANHOLE LOCK SYSTEM
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735283
Dock Leveler With Reinforced Lip Plate
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+8.5%)
1y 12m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1589 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month