Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/499,529

METHOD FOR PROVIDING AT LEAST ONE FIRST METADATA ATTRIBUTE COMPRISED BY MEDICAL IMAGE DATA

Final Rejection §DP
Filed
Nov 01, 2023
Examiner
VO, QUANG N
Art Unit
2683
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Siemens Healthineers AG
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
439 granted / 612 resolved
+9.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
635
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
§103
52.8%
+12.8% vs TC avg
§102
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 612 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings Drawings 1-8 are acceptable. Information Disclosure Statement Examiner consider all of the documents cited in the Information Disclosure Statement filed on November 1, 2023, a supplement IDS on November 12, 2025. Response to Arguments Regarding claims 1 and 10 with a “standardized attribute value”. Examiner consider it is similar to an “image based attribute value”. Double Patenting The non-statutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A non-statutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on non-statutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a non-statutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based e-Terminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An e-Terminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about e-Terminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1 and 10 are rejected on the ground of non-statutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1 and 17 of U.S. Patent No. 12,322,091 B2. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because all limitations of claims 1 and 10 of instant application are similar to limitations of claims 1 and 17 of patent no. 12,322,091 B2 respectively. Instant application: 18499529 Patent: US 12,322,091 B2 Claim 1: Claim 1: a. A computer-implemented method for providing at least one first metadata attribute of medical image data, the method comprising: a. A computer-implemented method for providing at least one first metadata attribute associated with a medical image, the computer-implemented method comprising: b. receiving the medical image data and the at least one first metadata attribute, the at least one first metadata attribute including an attribute tag and a provisional attribute value; b. receiving the medical image and the at least one first metadata attribute, the received at least one first metadata attribute including an attribute tag and a provisional attribute value; c. applying a first trained function to the medical image data to determine a standardized attribute value; c. applying a first trained function to the medical image to determine an image-based attribute value; d. determining a final attribute value based on the provisional attribute value and the standardized attribute value; and d. checking whether the provisional attribute value is empty; e. providing the at least one first metadata attribute, the at least one first metadata attribute including the attribute tag and the final attribute value. e. determining a final attribute value based on the provisional attribute value, the image based attribute value, and a result of the checking; and f. providing the at least one first metadata attribute, the provided at least one first metadata attribute including the attribute tag and the final attribute value. Note: Regarding claim 1 of instant application no. 18/499,529 and claim 1 of patent no. 12,322,091 B2. Limitations of claim 1 of instant application no. 18/499,529 are similar of limitations of claim 1 of patent no. 12,322,091 B2. Limitations a-c of claim 1 of instant application are similar to limitations a-c of patent. More specifically, the combination of limitations d and e in claim 1 of instant application is similar to combinations of limitations e and f in claim 1 of patent. Claim 10: Claim 17: a. A unifying system for providing at least one metadata attribute associated with medical image data, the system comprising: a. A unifying system for providing at least one metadata attribute associated with a medical image, the unifying system comprising: b. an interface configured to receive the medical image data and the at least one metadata attribute, the at least one metadata attribute including an attribute tag and provisional attribute value; and b. an interface configured to receive the medical image and the at least one metadata attribute, the received at least one metadata attribute including an attribute tag and a provisional attribute value, and provide the at least one metadata attribute, the provided at least one metadata attribute including the attribute tag and a final attribute value; and c. a computation unit configured to, apply a first trained function to the medical image data to determine a standardized attribute value, determine a final attribute value based on the standardized attribute value, wherein the interface is configured to provide the at least one metadata attribute, the at least one metadata attribute including the attribute tag and the final attribute value. c. at least one processor configured to apply a first trained function to the medical image to determine an image based attribute value, check whether the provisional attribute value is empty, and determine the final attribute value based on the provisional attribute value, the image-based attribute value, and a result of the check. Note: Regarding claim 10 of instant application no. 18/499,529 and claim 17 of patent no. 12,322,091 B2. Limitations of claim 10 of instant application no. 18/499,529 are similar of limitations of claim 17 of patent no. 12,322,091 B2. Limitation “a” of claim 10 of instant application are similar to limitation “a” of claim 17 of patent. More specifically, the combination of limitations b and c in claim 10 of instant application is similar to combinations of limitations b and c in claim 17 of patent, although combinations of limitations b and c of claim 17 (patent) is more detail than combinations of limitations b and c in claim 10 of instant application. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to QUANG N VO whose telephone number is (571)270-1121. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 7AM-4PM, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abderrahim Merouan can be reached at 571-270-5254. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /QUANG N VO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2683
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 01, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §DP
Jan 22, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592002
COLOR CONVERSION SYSTEM, COLOR CONVERSION METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577842
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MEASURING VOLUME OF A DRILL CORE SAMPLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581023
GREYSCALE IMAGES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572996
FRACTIONALIZED TRANSFERS OF SENSOR DATA FOR STREAMING AND LATENCY-SENSITIVE APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573172
IMAGE OUTPUTTING DEVICE AND IMAGE OUTPUTTING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+8.3%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 612 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month