Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/499,767

METHOD FOR OPERATING A CHARGING STATION DESIGNED AND PROVIDED FOR CHARGING A TRACTION BATTERY OF A MOTOR VEHICLE WITH ELECTRIC ENERGY, THE CORRESPONDING CHARGING STATION, AND A BUILDING ARRANGEMENT HAVING A CHARGING STATION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 01, 2023
Priority
Nov 04, 2022 — DE 102022129145.6
Examiner
NGUYEN, NHA T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Audi AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
932 granted / 1069 resolved
+27.2% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1081
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§103
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
§102
33.7%
-6.3% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1069 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION 2. This Office Action responds to the Application filed on 11/01/2023 and IDS filed on 11/01/2023. Claims 1-10 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 3. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 4. Claim(s) 1-6 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Krucinski et al. (U.S. 2020/0369167 A1). As per claim 1, Krucinski discloses: A method for operating a charging station configured to charge a traction battery of a motor vehicle with electric energy, the method comprising: detecting by at least one sensor a displacement of a charging cable of the charging station and/or a position of a user of the charging station making use of the charging cable (See Para [0050], i.e. based on a determination of the direction(s) the user is at least attempting and/or intending to displace the charging connector 110 via information provided through the user's interaction with the input device 206, or sensors 206… force sensor(s) 206, to the controller 208 can also be used to determine a duration that the actuator(s) 200a, 200b is/are to be actuated and/or the distance that the suspension arm 114 is to be displaced about the post joint 150 and/or arm joint 172); and moving a charging arm of the charging station in a motorized manner in the direction of the displacement of the charging cable and/or in the direction of the position of the user (See Figure 8 & Para [0050], i.e. the degree of force and/or duration of time that the user exerts at least a predetermined level of force on the sensors 206 can be used by the controller 208 to determine, or otherwise predict, the extent, degree, and/or duration that the actuator(s) 200a, 200b is/are to be actuated to displace the suspension arm 114 along the post joint 150 and/or arm joint 172), wherein the charging cable is held by the charging arm of the charging station (See Figure 8, i.e. cable 108 is held by arm 114, See Para [0042]-[0050]). As per claim 2, Krucinski discloses all of the features of claim 1 as discloses above wherein Krucinski also discloses wherein the charging arm travels in a linear motion along at least one displacement axis and/or is rotated about at least one axis of rotation (See Figure 8, i.e. rotate at 150, See Para [0042]-[0050], i.e. suspension arm 114 can pivotally coupled to the post joint 150 and/or the support post 112 such that the entire suspension arm 114 can pivot or rotate in a direction that at least adjusts the vertical distance between the second end 118b of the suspension arm 114 and the ground 176). As per claim 3, Krucinski discloses all of the features of claim 1 as discloses above wherein Krucinski also discloses wherein the displacement of the charging cable occurs relative to a base device of the charging station, and wherein the charging cable is electrically connected to the base device (See Figure 8 & Para [0050], i.e. the degree of force and/or duration of time that the user exerts at least a predetermined level of force on the sensors 206 can be used by the controller 208 to determine, or otherwise predict, the extent, degree, and/or duration that the actuator(s) 200a, 200b is/are to be actuated to displace the suspension arm 114 along the post joint 150 and/or arm joint 172). As per claim 4, Krucinski discloses all of the features of claim 1 as discloses above wherein Krucinski also discloses wherein the at least one sensor is selected from the group consisting of a force sensor, a torque sensor, an acceleration sensor, a strain sensor, a position sensor and an optical sensor (See Para [0050], i.e. based on a determination of the direction(s) the user is at least attempting and/or intending to displace the charging connector 110 via information provided through the user's interaction with the input device 206, or sensors 206… force sensor(s) 206, to the controller 208 can also be used to determine a duration that the actuator(s) 200a, 200b is/are to be actuated and/or the distance that the suspension arm 114 is to be displaced about the post joint 150 and/or arm joint 172) As per claim 5, Krucinski discloses all of the features of claim 1 as discloses above wherein Krucinski also discloses wherein the at least one sensor is arranged on any of the charging arm, the charging cable and the base device (See Figure 8, i.e. 148a & 148b & Figure 9, i.e. sensor 206 within 110 & Para [0050], i.e. a force sensor(s) 206, to the controller 208 can also be used to determine a duration that the actuator(s) 200a, 200b is/are to be actuated and/or the distance that the suspension arm 114 is to be displaced about the post joint 150 and/or arm joint 172). As per claim 6, Krucinski discloses all of the features of claim 1 as discloses above wherein Krucinski also discloses changing the length of a region of the charging cable protruding beyond the charging arm based on the displacement of the charging cable and/or the position of the user (See Para [0033], i.e. the charging cable 108 can have a sufficient length to accommodate at least some movement of the charging connector 110 as the user displaces…Moreover, such swinging displacement can accommodate displacement of the charging connector 110 and suspended portion of the charging cable 108 in generally circular, non-circular, linear, and non-linear directions, as well as movement simultaneously along a plurality of axes, including simultaneously along at three axes of movement). As per claim 8, Krucinski discloses: A charging station for charging a traction battery of a motor vehicle with electric energy, the charging station comprising: a charging arm (See Figure 8, i.e. 114); and a charging cable, the charging cable held by the charging arm of the charging station (See Figure 8, i.e. cable 108 & arm 114), wherein the charging station is configured to detect, by at least one sensor, a displacement of the charging cable and/or a position of a user of the charging station making use of the charging cable (See Para [0050], i.e. based on a determination of the direction(s) the user is at least attempting and/or intending to displace the charging connector 110 via information provided through the user's interaction with the input device 206, or sensors 206… force sensor(s) 206, to the controller 208 can also be used to determine a duration that the actuator(s) 200a, 200b is/are to be actuated and/or the distance that the suspension arm 114 is to be displaced about the post joint 150 and/or arm joint 172) and to move the charging arm in a motorized manner in the direction of the displacement of the charging cable and/or in the direction of the position of the user (See Figure 8 & Para [0050], i.e. the degree of force and/or duration of time that the user exerts at least a predetermined level of force on the sensors 206 can be used by the controller 208 to determine, or otherwise predict, the extent, degree, and/or duration that the actuator(s) 200a, 200b is/are to be actuated to displace the suspension arm 114 along the post joint 150 and/or arm joint 172). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 5. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 6. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Krucinski et al. (U.S. 2020/0369167 A1) in view of MacDonald (U.S. Pat. No. 11,975,625 B2). As per claim 7, Krucinski discloses all of the features of claim 1 as discloses above. Krucinski does not teach: holding the charging arm in a starting position by a locking device. However, MacDonald teach: holding the charging arm in a starting position by a locking device (See Col 4; Lines 4-18, i.e. a secure stow away of the cable when not in use preventing access to unauthorised users, See Figure 2-5 & Col 9; Lines 14-35, See Col 6; Line 1 to Col 7; Line 53, See Col 8; Lines 62-67, i.e. The housing 60 is arranged to enclose the cable support 10 such that the elongate supporting structure 40, the boom arm 20 and the slidable pivot 30 are enclosed within the housing 60 when the boom arm 20 is stowed). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to incorporate the teaching of MacDonald into the teaching of Krucinski because it would allow for the vehicle charger to be compact form that have minimum impact on the usage on the land they are installed (See Col 1; Lines 20-45). 7. Claim(s) 9-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over MacDonald (U.S. Pat. No. 11,975,625 B2) in view of Krucinski et al. (U.S. 2020/0369167 A1). As per claim 9, MacDonald discloses: A building arrangement comprising a wall (See Figure 1, i.e. charging equipment locate on wall mounted & Col 5; Lines 15-29, i.e. cable support 10 is located on the front wall of a building and the vehicle is located on the street ) and a charging station arranged on the wall for the charging of a traction battery of a motor vehicle with electric energy (See Figure 1, i.e. charging equipment locate on wall mounted, Col 5; Lines 15-49, i.e. cable support 10 is located on the front wall of a building and the vehicle is located on the street… able 70 comprises an electrical supply cable which is used to supply electricity from a charging point to a vehicle, for example, an electric vehicle (EV). In some embodiments, the electricity supplied is used to charge internal batteries) , wherein the charging station comprises a charging arm (See Figures 1-15, i.e. charge arm 20 and cable 70 & Col 6; Lines 18-28, i.e. cable support 10 comprises a boom arm 20 for supporting a cable 70) and a charging cable (See Figures 1-15, i.e. charge arm 20 and cable 70 & Col 6; Lines 18-28, i.e. cable support 10 comprises a boom arm 20 for supporting a cable 70), the charging cable held by the charging arm of the charging station (See Figures 1-15, i.e. charge arm 20 and cable 70 & Col 6; Lines 18-28, i.e. cable support 10 comprises a boom arm 20 for supporting a cable 70). MacDonald does not teach: wherein the charging station is configured to detect, by at least one sensor, a displacement of the charging cable and/or a position of a user of the charging station making use of the charging cable and to move the charging arm in motorized manner in the direction of the displacement of the charging cable and/or in the direction of the position of the user. However, Krucinski teach: wherein the charging station is configured to detect, by at least one sensor, a displacement of the charging cable and/or a position of a user of the charging station making use of the charging cable (See Para [0050], i.e. based on a determination of the direction(s) the user is at least attempting and/or intending to displace the charging connector 110 via information provided through the user's interaction with the input device 206, or sensors 206… force sensor(s) 206, to the controller 208 can also be used to determine a duration that the actuator(s) 200a, 200b is/are to be actuated and/or the distance that the suspension arm 114 is to be displaced about the post joint 150 and/or arm joint 172) and to move the charging arm in motorized manner in the direction of the displacement of the charging cable and/or in the direction of the position of the user (See Figure 8 & Para [0050], i.e. the degree of force and/or duration of time that the user exerts at least a predetermined level of force on the sensors 206 can be used by the controller 208 to determine, or otherwise predict, the extent, degree, and/or duration that the actuator(s) 200a, 200b is/are to be actuated to displace the suspension arm 114 along the post joint 150 and/or arm joint 172). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to incorporate the teaching of Krucinski into the teaching of MacDonald because it would assist user to move heavy charge cable and maneuver the cable into position for charging a vehicle (See Para [0003]). As per claim 10, MacDonald and Krucinski discloses all of the features of claim 9 as discloses above wherein MacDonald also discloses wherein the charging arm is received in a recess formed in the wall in at least one position (See Figure 15 & Col 10; Lines 11-16, i.e. pipe is twin-walled, in which case, the pipe 200 has an interior inner cavity 201 (for example, through which water can flow) which is separated by an inner wall from an outer cavity 211 within which the cable 70 and/or support structure is located). Conclusion 8. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NHA T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-1405. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jack Chiang can be reached at 571-272-7483. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NHA T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2851
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 01, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743570
GENERATIVE SELF-SUPERVISED LEARNING TO TRANSFORM CIRCUIT NETLISTS
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743648
SUBSPACE LEAKAGE POSTSELECTION VIA METASTABLE MANIFOLD SHELVING
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743649
High Density Fiber Optic Packaging for Cryogenic Applications
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12731062
QUANTUM BIT ARRAY AND QUANTUM COMPUTER
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12733435
REDISTRIBUTION LAYER METALLIC LAYOUT STRUCTURE AND METHOD WITH WARPAGE REDUCTION
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.3%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1069 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month