Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/500,294

COMPACT RELIABLE ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 02, 2023
Priority
Nov 08, 2022 — CN 202222975557.X
Examiner
FIGUEROA, FELIX O
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Amphenol East Asia Electronic Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
72%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
535 granted / 923 resolved
-10.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
977
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
56.6%
+16.6% vs TC avg
§102
34.4%
-5.6% vs TC avg
§112
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 923 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/7/2026 has been entered. Election/Restrictions Based on Applicant’s election of Group I and Species 1, claims 4, 8, 9 and 18-20 remain withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention/species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 5- 7, 10 and 14-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nishio et al. (US 5,938,473) in view of Wright (US 6,340,318). Regarding claim 1, Nishio discloses an electrical connector comprising: a plurality of terminals (12); a housing (11) holding the plurality of terminals; and a shell (13) disposed outside the housing, the shell comprising a wall (bottom) comprising a mounting face; and a member (15) integrated with the wall and extending from the mounting face in a direction substantially perpendicular to the mounting face (Figs. 1 and 2); a centerline of the body extending in the direction substantially perpendicular to the mounting face; the body extends from a proximal end connected to the wall to a distal end. Nishio discloses substantially the claimed invention except for the specific shape of the member. Wright teaches the use of a member (12) comprising a cylindrical body (15) with a hollow core (45), a centerline of the cylindrical body extending through the hollow core and extending in the direction substantially perpendicular to the mounting face, wherein: the cylindrical body extends from a proximal end (13L) connected to the wall to a distal end (bottom of Fig. 2); the cylindrical body comprises a plurality of diameters (see Fig. 2); and the plurality of diameters decrease from the proximal end toward the distal end (see Fig. 2). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the invention was effectively filed to use a cylindrical body with a hollow core, as taught by Wright, in order to provide easier insertion with a larger surface connecting area. Regarding claim 2, Nishio discloses the member having a hollow core (between 15 and 15b in Fig. 1). Regarding claim 3, Nishio discloses the member comprising a same material (i.e. metal) as the wall of the shell. Regarding claim 5, Nishio discloses substantially the claimed invention except for the specific material of the shell. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to form the member comprising at least one of copper, a copper alloy, a zinc alloy, an aluminum alloy, or stainless steel as the preferred material, in order to provide the desired conductivity for the shell, and since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design preference. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416. Regarding claim 6, Nishio discloses the member disposed in a central portion of the mounting face (see Fig. 2); and the shell comprising a plurality of tails (13a) disposed around a boundary of the mounting face. Regarding claim 7, Nishio discloses the wall comprises a pair of beams (not labeled, one shown on side wall in Fig. 1) configured to engage a mating connector; the member comprises a proximal end (top in Fig. 1) connected to the wall; and the proximal end is disposed between the pair of beams. Regarding claim 10, Nishio discloses the member comprising a base portion (15a), the base portion connected to the wall at a proximal end of the member, a guiding portion (15b) tapering towards a distal end of the member opposite the proximal end of the member, and an intermediate portion connecting the base portion and the guiding portion; and the intermediate portion has a diameter less than a diameter of the base portion at the proximal end of the member. Regarding claim 14, Nishio discloses an electrical connector (10) comprising: a shell (13) comprising a wall facing the surface of a circuit board and a member (15) extending from the wall, the member comprising a base portion (15a), a distal end (15b), and an intermediate portion connecting the base portion and the distal end, the intermediate portion having a diameter less than a diameter of the base portion; and a subassembly (11, 12) at least partially disposed in the shell, the subassembly comprising a plurality of terminals (12) and a housing (11) holding the plurality of terminals. Nishio does not disclose the cylindrical shape. Wright teaches a member comprising a base portion (13L) having a cylindrical shape having a diameter and connected to the wall, a distal end (bottom, Fig. 2), and an intermediate portion (14) having a cylindrical shape having a uniform diameter along a centerline of the cylindrical shape (Fig. 2), the intermediate portion connecting the base portion and the distal end, the uniform diameter of the intermediate portion being less than a diameter of the base portion (13L). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the invention was effectively filed to form the member with a cylindrical shape, as taught by Wright, in order to provide a larger connection area and a more stable surface connection. Regarding claim 15, Nishio discloses the member of the shell electrically couples the shell to ground structures (20) in the circuit board (14, Fig. 9). Regarding claim 16, Nishio discloses the shell comprising a pair of side walls extending substantially perpendicular to the wall and a plurality of tails (13a) extending from the pair of side walls into the circuit board. Regarding claim 17, Nishio discloses the wall comprising a pair of beams (on shown in sidewall of Fig. 1) configured to engage a mating connector; the member comprises a proximal end connected to the wall; and the proximal end is disposed between the pair of beams (Fig. 2). Claims 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nishio and Wright, and further in view of Huang et al. (US 7,214,096). Regarding claim 11, Nishio discloses the wall comprising the mounting face being a lower wall of the shell; the shell comprises an upper wall substantially parallel to the lower wall, a pair of side walls disposed between the upper wall and the lower wall and spaced from each other. Huang teaches each of the pair of side walls comprising a plurality of tails (104A, 105A) extending therefrom in the direction substantially perpendicular to the mounting face. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the invention was effectively filed to use a plurality of tails and connection portions, as taught by Huang, in order to provide a sturdier shell arrangement. Regarding claim 12, Huang teaches the shell comprising a rear wall connected with the pair of side walls and the upper wall; and the rear wall comprises a pair of connecting portions (105) each having a hole (lower side) configured to receive a protrusion extending from the pair of side walls, respectively (intended use). Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nishio and Wright, and further in view of Inoue et al. (US 2004/0242070). Regarding claim 13, Inoue teaches the housing comprising at least one recess (32); and at least one of the upper wall (28) and the lower wall of the shell comprising at least one beam (30) that engages the at least one recess of the housing. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the invention was effectively filed to use a beam and recess, as taught by Inoue, in order to provide a secure mounting between the housing and the shell. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claims have been considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection, as applied. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FELIX O FIGUEROA whose telephone number is (571)272-2003. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke can be reached at (571)727-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FELIX O FIGUEROA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2833
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Mar 13, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 20, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 20, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 20, 2026
Response Filed
May 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 07, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12695227
CONNECTOR
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690149
CARD HOLDER APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12658626
HIGH SPEED AND HIGH DENSITY CABLE INTERCONNECTS
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651879
WATT-HOUR METER BLADE
5y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12649428
ELECTRIC JUNCTION BOX FOR VEHICLE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
72%
With Interview (+14.4%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 923 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month