DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Election/Restrictions
Based on Applicant’s election of Group I and Species 1, claims 4, 8, 9 and 18-20 remain withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention/species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claims 1-3, 5- 7 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nishio et al. (US 5,938,473) in view of Watanabe et al. (US 7,108,521).
Regarding claim 1, Nishio discloses an electrical connector comprising: a plurality of terminals (12); a housing (11) holding the plurality of terminals; and a shell (13) disposed outside the housing, the shell comprising a wall (bottom) comprising a mounting face; and a member (15) integrated with the wall and extending from the mounting face in a direction substantially perpendicular to the mounting face (Figs. 1 and 2).
Watanabe teaches the use of a member (43) comprising a cylindrical body (46) with a hollow core (45). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the invention was effectively filed to use a cylindrical body with a hollow core, as taught by Watanabe, in order to provide easier insertion with a stronger frictional fit.
Regarding claim 2, Nishio discloses the member having a hollow core (between 15 and 15b in Fig. 1).
Regarding claim 3, Nishio discloses the member comprising a same material (i.e. metal) as the wall of the shell.
Regarding claim 5, Nishio discloses substantially the claimed invention except for the specific material of the shell. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to form the member comprising at least one of copper, a copper alloy, a zinc alloy, an aluminum alloy, or stainless steel as the preferred material, in order to provide the desired conductivity for the shell, and since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design preference. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416.
Regarding claim 6, Nishio discloses the member disposed in a central portion of the mounting face (see Fig. 2); and the shell comprising a plurality of tails (13a) disposed around a boundary of the mounting face.
Regarding claim 7, Nishio discloses the wall comprises a pair of beams (not labeled, one shown on side wall in Fig. 1) configured to engage a mating connector; the member comprises a proximal end (top in Fig. 1) connected to the wall; and the proximal end is disposed between the pair of beams.
Regarding claim 10, Nishio discloses the member comprising a base portion (15a), the base portion connected to the wall at a proximal end of the member, a guiding portion (15b) tapering towards a distal end of the member opposite the proximal end of the member, and an intermediate portion connecting the base portion and the guiding portion; and the intermediate portion has a diameter less than a diameter of the base portion at the proximal end of the member.
Claims 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nishio and Watanabe, and further in view of Huang et al. (US 7,214,096).
Regarding claim 11, Nishio discloses the wall comprising the mounting face being a lower wall of the shell; the shell comprises an upper wall substantially parallel to the lower wall, a pair of side walls disposed between the upper wall and the lower wall and spaced from each other. Huang teaches each of the pair of side walls comprising a plurality of tails (104A, 105A) extending therefrom in the direction substantially perpendicular to the mounting face.
Regarding claim 12, Huang teaches the shell comprising a rear wall connected with the pair of side walls and the upper wall; and the rear wall comprises a pair of connecting portions (105) each having a hole (lower side) configured to receive a protrusion extending from the pair of side walls, respectively (intended use).
It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the invention was effectively filed to use a plurality of tails and connection portions, as taught by Huang, in order to provide a sturdier shell arrangement.
Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nishio and Watanabe, and further in view of Inoue et al. (US 2004/0242070).
Regarding claim 13, Inoue teaches the housing comprising at least one recess (32); and at least one of the upper wall (28) and the lower wall of the shell comprising at least one beam (30) that engages the at least one recess of the housing. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the invention was effectively filed to use a beam and recess, as taught by Inoue, in order to provide a secure mounting between the housing and the shell.
Claims 14-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nishio et al. (US 5,938,473) in view of Blossfeld (US 2006/0110955).
Regarding claim 14, Nishio discloses an electronic system comprising: a circuit board (14) comprising a surface (top); and an electrical connector (10) mounted on the circuit board, the electrical connector comprising: a shell (13) comprising a wall facing the surface of the circuit board and a member (15) extending from the wall into the circuit board, the member comprising a base portion (15a), a distal end (15b), and an intermediate portion connecting the base portion and the distal end, the intermediate portion having a diameter less than a diameter of the base portion; and a subassembly (11, 12) at least partially disposed in the shell, the subassembly comprising a plurality of terminals (12) and a housing (11) holding the plurality of terminals.
Nishio does not disclose the cylindrical shape. Blossfeld teaches a member comprising a base portion (52) having a cylindrical shape and connected to the wall, a distal end (54, 56), and an intermediate portion (70, 72) having a cylindrical shape, the intermediate portion connecting the base portion and the distal end, the intermediate portion having a diameter less than a diameter of the base portion. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the invention was effectively filed to form the member with a cylindrical shape, as taught by Blossfeld, in order to provide a larger connection area and a more stable surface connection.
Regarding claim 15, Nishio discloses the member of the shell electrically couples the shell to ground structures (20) in the circuit board (14, Fig. 9).
Regarding claim 16, Nishio discloses the shell comprising a pair of side walls extending substantially perpendicular to the wall and a plurality of tails (13a) extending from the pair of side walls into the circuit board.
Regarding claim 17, Nishio discloses the wall comprising a pair of beams (on shown in sidewall of Fig. 1) configured to engage a mating connector; the member comprises a proximal end connected to the wall; and the proximal end is disposed between the pair of beams (Fig. 2).
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claims have been considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection, as applied.
Conclusion
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FELIX O FIGUEROA whose telephone number is (571)272-2003. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-6pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke can be reached at (571)727-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/FELIX O FIGUEROA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2833
Prosecution Insights