Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/500,495

BLENDING METHOD FOR INTER PREDICTION WITH GEOMETRY PARTITION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 02, 2023
Priority
Nov 22, 2018 — CN PCT/CN2018/116886 +5 more
Examiner
HUBER, JEREMIAH CHARLES
Art Unit
2481
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Bytedance Inc.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
12m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
459 granted / 663 resolved
+11.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
699
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
82.9%
+42.9% vs TC avg
§102
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
§112
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 663 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 3/16/2026 has been entered. Claim Interpretation Claim 20 relates to a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing a bitstream a generated by a particular encoding method. Since the claims relate to a bitstream which is stored on a computer readable medium after all coding functions have been performed the bitstream no longer has any functional relationship with a processor or other machine, but instead relates to e.g. a video stored on a hard drive. The purpose of the stored bitstream is only to convey meaning to a human viewer of the coded bitstream and is thus non-functional descriptive material. Non-functional descriptive material used only to convey messages or meaning is given little patentable weight (See MPEP 2111.05). For the purposes of examination the examiner will interpret the claim as relating only to a computer readable medium storing data. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zheng et al (2013/0114717). In regard to claim 20 Zheng discloses a computer readable medium storing a bitstream (Zheng Fig. 1 and pars 35-36 note channel 16 carrying encoded video data may include non-transitory computer readable media such as a DVD). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3-5, 7 and 15-19 allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Independent claims 1, 18 and 19 relate to converting a current block between a bitstream and a video where the block is coded with a geometric partitioning mode, the geometric partitioning mode being a prediction mode wherein the prediction candidates are determined using a pairwise average candidate, the pairwise average candidate being generated using a pair of candidates having indices 0 and 1 in a regular merge list, the pairwise candidate being calculated separately for each reference picture list, determining a candidate index that is included in the bitstream and is smaller than a maximum allowed number of candidates, converting the current block using the candidate list and candidate index, the geometric partitioning mode including first and second motion information based on the candidate list and having a weighting process based on a weighted sum of the samples derived from the first and second motion information. The closest arts are Zhang, Lee and Guo. Zhang discloses a geometric partitioning mode in which a current block is partitioned into non-rectangular prediction units. Zhang further discloses that prediction units may be coded using a merge mode including a merge index into a candidate list that indicates motion information for each PU. However, Zhang discloses that geometric partitioning is independent of prediction mode and does not require that geometric partitioning be based on a regular merge list including a pairwise average candidate. Lee discloses generating additional merge candidates based on an average of pairs of other merge candidates. Guo discloses weighted blending along the boundaries of prediction units predicted using first and second motions. However, neither Lee no Guo remedy the deficiency of Zheng tying the geometric partitioning mode to a specific prediction mode including a pairwise average candidate as required by the independent claims. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEREMIAH CHARLES HALLENBECK-HUBER whose telephone number is (571)272-5248. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday from 9 A.M. to 5 P.M. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Vaughn can be reached at (571)272-3922. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEREMIAH C HALLENBECK-HUBER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2481
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 6 earlier events
May 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 03, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 15, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Feb 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12634473
OVERLAPPED DECODER SIDE MOTION REFINEMENT
2y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634509
METHOD, APPARATUS, AND MEDIUM FOR VIDEO PROCESSING
1y 12m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634440
Multi-Frame Motion Compensation Synthesis For Video Coding
1y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627792
SCREEN CONTENT PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12621485
METHOD, APPARATUS, AND MEDIUM FOR VIDEO PROCESSING
1y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+13.5%)
3y 6m (~12m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 663 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month