Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/500,799

BISPECIFIC ANTIBODY AGAINST CD3 AND CD20 IN COMBINATION THERAPY FOR TREATING DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Nov 02, 2023
Priority
Sep 10, 2020 — provisional 63/076,797 +2 more
Examiner
XIAO, YAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Genmab A/S
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
513 granted / 757 resolved
+7.8% vs TC avg
Strong +52% interview lift
Without
With
+51.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
55 currently pending
Career history
793
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§103
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 757 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION 2. Claims 1-8, 12, 15, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 33-38, 46-50 and 64-67 are pending and currently under prosecution. Priority 3. Applicant’s claim under 35 U.S.C. §§ 119(e) and/or 120 for benefit of the earlier filing date of applications, is acknowledged. Claim Objections 4. Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 recites: “a first binding arm comprising which binds to human CD3ε (epsilon)” should be “a first binding arm Double Patenting 5. The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. 6. Claims 1-8, 12, 15, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 33-38, 46-50 and 64-67 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-33 of U.S. Patent No. US 11,845,805. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because for the following reasons: Claims 1-8, 12, 15, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 33-38, 46-50 and 64-67 are herein drawn to a method of treating diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in a human subject, the method comprising administering to the subject (a) a bispecific antibody, (b) rituximab, (c) cyclophosphamide, (d) doxorubicin, (e) vincristine and (f) prednisone in 21-day cycles, wherein (a) the bispecific antibody comprises: (i) a first binding arm which binds to human CD3ε (epsilon) and comprises a heavy chain and a light chain comprising the amino acid sequences set forth in SEO ID NOs: 24 and 25, respectively, and (ii) a second binding arm which binds to human CD20 and comprises a heavy chain and a light chain comprising the amino acid sequences set forth in SEO ID NOs: 26 and 27, respectively; wherein a priming dose of the bi specific antibody is administered subcutaneously on day 1 of the first 21-day cycle, an intermediate dose of the bispecific antibody is administered subcutaneously on day 8 of the first 21-day cycle, and a full dose of 24 or 48 mg of the bi specific antibody is administered subcutaneously on day 15 of the first 21-day cycle, wherein the priming dose and intermediate dose are at a lower dose as compared with the full dose; (b) rituximab is administered intravenously at a dose of 375 mg/m2 once every three weeks; (c) cyclophosphamide is administered intravenously at a dose of 750 mg/m2 once every three weeks; (d) doxorubicin is administered intravenously at a dose of 50 mg/m2 once every three weeks; (e) vincristine is administered intravenously weeks at a dose of 1.4 mg/m2 once every three; and (f) prednisone is administered orally or intravenously at a dose of 100 mg once a day from day 1 to day 5 of each 21-day cycle; wherein administration of the combination continues at least until the subject exhibits a complete metabolic response (CMR), a partial metabolic response or stable disease, or until progressive disease develops or unacceptable toxicity occurs. Claims 1-33 of U.S. Patent No. US 11,845,805 are drawn to a method of treating diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in a human subject, the method comprising administering to the subject a bispecific antibody, and an effective amount of (a) rituximab, (b) cyclophosphamide, (c) doxorubicin, (d) vincristine and (e) prednisone, wherein the bispecific antibody comprises a first heavy chain and a first light chain comprising the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 24 and 25, respectively, and a second heavy chain and a second light chain comprising the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 26 and 27, respectively, and wherein rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and the bispecific antibody are administered in 21-day cycles, wherein: (a) the bispecific antibody is administered as follows: (i) in cycle 1, a priming dose of 0.16 mg is administered on day 1, an intermediate dose of 0.8 mg is administered on day 8, and a dose of 24 mg or 48 mg is administered on day 15; (ii) in cycles 2-4, a dose of 24 mg or 48 mg is administered on days 1, 8, and 15; (iii) in cycles 5 and 6, a dose of 24 mg or 48 mg is administered on day 1; (b) rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine are administered on day 1 in cycles 1-6; and (c) prednisone is administered on days 1-5 in cycles 1-6. It is noted that 35 USC § 121 does not provide protection for continuation or continuation in-part applications, and this application is a continuation of U.S. Patent No. US 11,845,805. See 92 USPQ2d 1289 Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (Fed. Cir. 2009) and Pfizer, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. 518 F.3d 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2008). Conclusion 7. No claim is allowed. 8. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YAN XIAO whose telephone number is (571)270-3578. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Samira Jean-Louis can be reached on 571-270-3503. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YAN XIAO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 02, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698326
ANTI-CD19 ANTIBODY FORMULATIONS
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12673995
MATERIALS AND METHODS FOR MODULATING T CELL MEDIATED IMMUNITY
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668623
ANTI-PERIOSTIN HUMANIZED MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY, AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND USE THEREOF
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668636
PHARMACEUTICAL COMBINATIONS
1y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662540
COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITION OF MICA/B SHEDDING
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+51.6%)
2y 11m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 757 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month