Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/501,527

PRODUCTS AND METHODS INCORPORATING EXTENSIBLE PAPER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 03, 2023
Priority
Nov 04, 2022 — provisional 63/422,789
Examiner
HELVEY, PETER N.
Art Unit
3734
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Domtar Paper Company LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allowance Rate
762 granted / 1399 resolved
-15.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
1458
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
82.2%
+42.2% vs TC avg
§102
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1399 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species 5, Figures 7-8 in the reply filed on 12/23/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 3-10 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/23/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2 and 17-25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vierengel (US 1649760) in view of Nordling et al. (US 2021/0102340, hereinafter ‘Nordling’). Vierengel discloses a package comprising: one or more sheets of paper (156+158) defining an interior volume; except does not expressly disclose the extensibility properties of the paper material as claimed. However, Nordling teaches manufacturing paper wherein the paper has a machine direction (MD) extensibility of 10% or greater (para 0016), and a cross-direction (CD) extensibility of 6% or greater (para 00136) as claimed. At the time of the invention, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to use the paper material taught by Nordling to manufacture the envelope taught by Vierengel, in order to provide stretchability without compromising printability as taught by Nordling (para 0003). Vierengel as modified above further results in a device wherein the one or more sheets of paper define a bag (Vierengel Figs. 20-24); the one or more sheets of paper define a body having opposing first and second sides (156, 158) and one or more peripheral edges (Vierengel Figs. 20-24); the body defines an opening at one of the one or more peripheral edges, and where the body is configured to be joined to itself to close the opening (Vierengel Figs. 20-24); the body defines a flap (129) configured to cover the opening; the opening is disposed at one of the one or more edges peripheral edges (Vierengel Fig. 22); the one or more sheets of paper comprises a single sheet of paper folded (@151) and joined itself to define the interior volume. Regarding claims 22 and 24, Vierengel as modified above discloses all limitations of the claim(s) as detailed above except does not expressly disclose the MD or CD extensibility being oriented towards the opening as claimed. However it is noted that selecting the direction of the paper in forming the device taught by the combination above is a relatively basic selection process that would have been within the level of ordinary skill in the art prior to the invention by applicant as there are only two realistic choices…MD or CD being oriented towards the opening as claimed. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to make the Vierengel as modified above device with either the MD or CD of the paper being oriented towards the opening, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. In re Japikse, 86 USPQ 70. Vierengel as modified above further results in a device wherein the single sheet of paper is joined to itself along two seams oriented toward the opening (Vierengel 109, 110). Claim(s) 26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vierengel (US 1649760) in view of Nordling et al. (US 2021/0102340, hereinafter ‘Nordling’) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Lee et al. (US 2003/0220036, hereinafter ‘Lee’). Vierengel as modified above discloses all limitations of the claim(s) as detailed above except does not expressly disclose the additives as claimed. However, Lee teaches coating paperstock material with an additive which imparts one or more desired properties such as water resistance (para 0176) as claimed. At the time of the invention, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to use the coated laminate paper taught by Lee to construct the envelope taught by Vierengel as modified above, in order to provide specific desired properties such as water resistance as taught by Lee (para 0176). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER N. HELVEY whose telephone number is (571)270-1423. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10am-7pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Newhouse can be reached at 571-272-4544. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PETER N HELVEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3734 March 31, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 03, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12630094
VEHICLE ROOF TRACK SUPPORT STRUCTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12622493
HEAD-MOUNTABLE DEVICE BAND WITH A LATCH MOVABLE BY A TAB
2y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618643
HANDLESS SHOULDER-FIRE FIREARM CARRY SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12617348
LUGGAGE SYSTEM AND VEHICLE INCLUDING SAME
1y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12617586
FITTING TOOL AND FITTING-TOOL-EQUIPPED BAG BODY
1y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+18.7%)
2y 11m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1399 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month