Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 21, 2026
Application No. 18/502,072

BOOTH APPARATUS

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Nov 05, 2023
Priority
May 26, 2023 — JP 2023-086947
Examiner
XIE, KWIN
Art Unit
2626
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
289 granted / 450 resolved
+2.2% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
468
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
54.5%
+14.5% vs TC avg
§102
39.0%
-1.0% vs TC avg
§112
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 450 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment As a result of the Amendment filed on July 20, 2026, claims 1, 3 and 5-16 are pending. Claim 1 is amended. Claim 2 and 4 are canceled. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 3 and 5-16 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, and 5-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kimura et al., United States Patent Application Publication No. US 20240169319 A1. Regarding claim 1, Kimura discloses a booth apparatus (Figs. 1-7, generally) comprising: a space forming member that includes a first surface, a second surface, and a third surface and that forms a space surrounded by the first surface, the second surface, and the third surface, wherein the first surface, the second surface, and the third surface are respectively formed by a first side wall, a second side wall, and a third side wall that are connected to each other (Figs. 1, #12a/12b/12c; Detailed Description, [0073-0078]); an electronic blackboard that is provided on any of the first surface, the second surface, or the third surface in the space (Figs. 1, #12a/12b/12c; Detailed Description, [0073-0078], “n the case illustrated in FIG. 1, the information processing system further detects, from the activity information, that a user C faces an image display device 12a. The user C may be moving or stay at a position. In other words, based on the position information included in the activity information of the user C, the information processing system detects that the user C directs the face or the body to a wall serving as a display of the image display device 12a or a screen generated by the image display device 12a. The image display devices 12a, 12b, and 12c may be collectively referred to as “image display devices 12” in the following description”; See also Fig. 2 and Detailed Description, [0096-0097]); and a projecting device that projects an image onto at least one surface out of the first surface, the second surface, or the third surface on which the electronic blackboard is not provided (Figs. 2-3, projector, #10; Detailed Description, [0096-0099], “Examples of the information processing system 10 include a projector, a display device having an electronic whiteboard function, an output device such as digital signage, a head-up display (HUD) apparatus, an industrial machine, an image-capturing device, a sound collecting device, a medical device, a networked home appliance, a connected car, a laptop PC, a mobile phone, a smartphone, a tablet communication terminal, a game console, a PDA, a digital camera, a wearable PC, and a desktop PC.”; See also Detailed Description, [0144], “he user guide unit 33 determines which of the image display devices 12 in the meeting room the user faces based on the position information and the direction of the user, and generates a work area of the user on the image display device 12. In the case where the image display devices 12 are projectors, the user guide unit 33 determines which of the image display devices 12 is projecting the screen that the user faces, and causes the determined image display device 12 to display a work area of the user.”), wherein the second surface is a surface that intersects the first surface beside the first surface (See Fig. 1, 12a/12b/12; 12b is mapped onto second surface), the third surface is a surface that faces the first surface beside the second surface and that intersects the second surface (See Fig. 1, 12a/12b/12; 12c is mapped onto third surface), the electronic blackboard is provided on the second surface (Figs. 1, #12b; Detailed Description, [0073-0078], “In the case illustrated in FIG. 1, the information processing system further detects, from the activity information, that a user C faces an image display device 12a. The user C may be moving or stay at a position. In other words, based on the position information included in the activity information of the user C, the information processing system detects that the user C directs the face or the body to a wall serving as a display of the image display device 12a or a screen generated by the image display device 12a. The image display devices 12a, 12b, and 12c may be collectively referred to as “image display devices 12” in the following description”; See also Fig. 2 and Detailed Description, [0096-0097]), and the projecting device projects the image onto at least one surface out of the first surface or the third surface (Figs. 2-3, projector, #10; Detailed Description, [0096-0099], “Examples of the information processing system 10 include a projector, a display device having an electronic whiteboard function, an output device such as digital signage, a head-up display (HUD) apparatus, an industrial machine, an image-capturing device, a sound collecting device, a medical device, a networked home appliance, a connected car, a laptop PC, a mobile phone, a smartphone, a tablet communication terminal, a game console, a PDA, a digital camera, a wearable PC, and a desktop PC.”; See also Detailed Description, [0144], “he user guide unit 33 determines which of the image display devices 12 in the meeting room the user faces based on the position information and the direction of the user, and generates a work area of the user on the image display device 12. In the case where the image display devices 12 are projectors, the user guide unit 33 determines which of the image display devices 12 is projecting the screen that the user faces, and causes the determined image display device 12 to display a work area of the user.”). Regarding claim 3, Kimura discloses wherein the projecting device projects the image onto any of the first surface or the third surface in accordance with an attribute of an authenticated user (Figs. 2-3, projector, #10; Detailed Description, [0096-0099], “Examples of the information processing system 10 include a projector, a display device having an electronic whiteboard function, an output device such as digital signage, a head-up display (HUD) apparatus, an industrial machine, an image-capturing device, a sound collecting device, a medical device, a networked home appliance, a connected car, a laptop PC, a mobile phone, a smartphone, a tablet communication terminal, a game console, a PDA, a digital camera, a wearable PC, and a desktop PC.”; See also Detailed Description, [0144], “he user guide unit 33 determines which of the image display devices 12 in the meeting room the user faces based on the position information and the direction of the user, and generates a work area of the user on the image display device 12. In the case where the image display devices 12 are projectors, the user guide unit 33 determines which of the image display devices 12 is projecting the screen that the user faces, and causes the determined image display device 12 to display a work area of the user.”). Regarding claim 5, Kimura discloses wherein the projecting device projects information input to the electronic blackboard onto at least one surface out of the first surface, the second surface, or the third surface on which the electronic blackboard is not provided (Figs. 2-3, projector, #10; Detailed Description, [0096-0099], See also Detailed Description, [0144]). Regarding claim 6, Kimura discloses wherein the projecting device projects the information to be gradually moved from an electronic blackboard side on the at least one surface (Detailed Description, [0242-251], “The second environmental control unit 37 may change the shape or size of the work areas 201 and 241 according to a user operation. The second environmental control unit 37 may move the work areas 201 and 241 as desired according to dragging or a voice input by the user.”). Regarding claim 7, Kimura discloses wherein the projecting device projects an image showing a position of start of projection of the information on the at least one surface (Detailed Description, [0144], “In the case where the image display devices 12 are projectors, the user guide unit 33 determines which of the image display devices 12 is projecting the screen that the user faces, and causes the determined image display device 12 to display a work area of the user. In other words, a user-dedicated work area is automatically prepared in a portion out of the entire screen of the image display device 12 in accordance with the position and the direction of the user.”; See also [0242-0251]). Regarding claim 8, Kimura discloses wherein the projecting device projects the image onto two surfaces out of the first surface, the second surface, or the third surface on which the electronic blackboard is not provided Detailed Description, [0144], “In the case where the image display devices 12 are projectors, the user guide unit 33 determines which of the image display devices 12 is projecting the screen that the user faces, and causes the determined image display device 12 to display a work area of the user. In other words, a user-dedicated work area is automatically prepared in a portion out of the entire screen of the image display device 12 in accordance with the position and the direction of the user.”), one of the two surfaces is determined as a first projection screen and the other of the two surfaces is determined as a second projection screen (Detailed Description, [0144][0231-0252], “FIG. 23 is a diagram illustrating the image display devices 12 to which the users face. FIG. 23 illustrates the three image display devices 12a to 12c. Since each of the image display devices 12a to 12c is a projection surface of a projector or a large touch panel, a user can use any of the image display devices 12a to 12c as a display device or an input device.”), and the projecting device projects a first image showing first information onto the first projection screen and projects a second image showing second information related to the first information onto the second projection screen (Detailed Description, [0144][0231-0252], “FIG. 23 is a diagram illustrating the image display devices 12 to which the users face. FIG. 23 illustrates the three image display devices 12a to 12c. Since each of the image display devices 12a to 12c is a projection surface of a projector or a large touch panel, a user can use any of the image display devices 12a to 12c as a display device or an input device.”; See Fig. 23). Regarding claim 9, Kimura discloses wherein the projecting device projects, onto the second projection screen, the second image included in the first image (Detailed Description, [0144][0231-0252]; See Figs. 23-26). Regarding claim 10, Kimura discloses wherein the projecting device projects, onto the at least one surface, a first image projected onto a surface of another booth apparatus (See Figs. 42 and Detailed Description, [0341-0350], showing image display onto different display apparatuses). Regarding claim 11, Kimura discloses wherein the projecting device projects, onto the at least one surface, a second image to be superimposed on the first image, the second image being captured by a camera that is provided on the surface of the other booth apparatus and that images an inside of the other booth apparatus (Detailed Description, [0091-0099], “The camera 18 in the meeting room captures an image in the meeting room and transmits the captured image data to the information processing system 10 as an output signal. For example, the camera 18 is a video camera of KINECT. The video camera of KINECT serves as a video camera that includes a range image sensor, an infrared sensor, and an array microphone. When such a video camera including a range image sensor, an infrared sensor, and an array microphone is used, the motion and the posture of the user are recognized.”; See next Fig. 42 and Detailed Description, [0341-0350], “. Further, an avatar 328 of the user is present in the virtual space 320. The field of view of the user is an image obtained by projecting a three-dimensional space onto a virtual camera on the assumption that the optical axis of the virtual camera is located in the line-of-sight direction from the position of the avatar 328. The user who participates in the meeting can change the position of the avatar 328 and the direction (including the line-of-sight direction) of the avatar 328 by operating a controller 331 for VR operation (may be referred to simply as “controller 331” in the following description). Further, the user can change the direction of the avatar 328 by operating the controller 331 or by changing his/her direction. In other words, the direction of the avatar 328 can be changed based on the direction information detected by the activity sensor 9. Accordingly, the user can view any viewpoint of the virtual space 320.”). Regarding claim 12, Kimura discloses the booth apparatus further comprising: a processor (Fig. 1-7, information processing system, #10) configured to: transmit, to the other booth apparatus, an image projected onto a surface onto which the first image is not projected so that the image is projected onto a surface of the other boot ah apparatus (Figs. 42-43, Detailed Description, [0341-350], “The virtual space 320 is, for example, a 360-degree three-dimensional space that imitates a space or a meeting room where people gather in a virtual space. For example, VR goggles or a VR headset (referred to as a display terminal 330 in the following description) worn by a user displays a field of view of the user in a virtual space. Further, an avatar 328 of the user is present in the virtual space 320. The field of view of the user is an image obtained by projecting a three-dimensional space onto a virtual camera on the assumption that the optical axis of the virtual camera is located in the line-of-sight direction from the position of the avatar 328. The user who participates in the meeting can change the position of the avatar 328 and the direction (including the line-of-sight direction) of the avatar 328 by operating a controller 331 for VR operation (may be referred to simply as “controller 331” in the following description). Further, the user can change the direction of the avatar 328 by operating the controller 331 or by changing his/her direction. In other words, the direction of the avatar 328 can be changed based on the direction information detected by the activity sensor 9. Accordingly, the user can view any viewpoint of the virtual space 320… When the virtual space 320 is the virtual office 324 as illustrated in FIG. 43, the position information and the direction information detected by the activity sensor 9 are used for the position and the direction in the virtual office 324. The information processing system 10 reproduces the real office 325 in the real space in the virtual space 320, and uses the position information and the direction information detected by the activity sensor 9 for the position and the direction of the avatar 328”). Regarding claim 13, Kimura discloses the booth apparatus further comprising: a microphone (figs. 1-7, microphone, #20), wherein the projecting device projects, onto the at least one surface, a text string representing a voice acquired by the microphone (Detailed Description, [0131][0159], “The sound data is converted into digital signals. The information processing system 10 performs speech recognition on the sound data and converts the sound data into speech data (text data).”). Regarding claim 14, Kimura discloses wherein the projecting device projects the text string onto a surface ahead of a person who has emitted the voice (Detailed Description, [0131][0159-0160], “The sound data is converted into digital signals. The information processing system 10 performs speech recognition on the sound data and converts the sound data into speech data (text data)… The position information and the direction are detected successively (for example, 10 times or more per second). By contrast, the behavior information and the speech data are event data detected only when a behavior and an utterance are detected, respectively. For this reason, in FIG. 8, the position information and the direction are illustrated in accordance with the event for the convenience of drawing, but the position information and the direction are successively detected at shorter intervals than the intervals illustrated in the drawing.”). Regarding claim 15, Kimura disclose wherein the projecting device projects the text string in a display style corresponding to an orientation of the person who has emitted the voice (Summary, 0005-0006]; Detailed Description, [0144-0160], “The user guide unit 33 determines which of the image display devices 12 in the meeting room the user faces based on the position information and the direction of the user, and generates a work area of the user on the image display device 12. In the case where the image display devices 12 are projectors, the user guide unit 33 determines which of the image display devices 12 is projecting the screen that the user faces, and causes the determined image display device 12 to display a work area of the user. In other words, a user-dedicated work area is automatically prepared in a portion out of the entire screen of the image display device 12 in accordance with the position and the direction of the user.”). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 16 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kimura in view of Nagahara, United States Patent Application Publication No. US 2021/0295217 A1. Regarding claim 16, Kimura discloses every element of claim 1 but does not explicitly disclose a processor configured to: turn on the projecting device in a case where a reservation for the space is made and a person who has made the reservation is authenticated for use of the space. However, Kimura does provide the suggestion of virtual meeting rooms and spaces (See Summary, also Figs. 1-7, Detailed Description, [0084-0090]; See also Fig. 42 and Detailed Description, [0341-0350]). Nagahara, in a similar field of endeavor, discloses a booth apparatus comprising a processor configured to turn on the projecting device in a case where a reservation for the space is made and a person who has made the reservation is authenticated for use of the space (Detailed Description, [0029-0040], “…meeting room terminal 90 transmits the check-in request (usage start request) to the meeting management server 30, and if the meeting room terminal 90 is authenticated with the meeting identification information, the meeting room terminal 90 receives a response indicating that the check-in has succeeded from the meeting management server 30. The meeting room terminal 90 displays that the meeting room is in session (in use).”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified the processor of Kimura to include the teachings of Nagahara wherein the processor is configured to turn on the projecting device in a case where a reservation for the space is made and a person who has made the reservation is authenticated for use of the space. The motivation to combine these arts is to provide operation of a facility reservation system for a plurality of authenticated users (see Nagahara, Detailed Description, [0029-0040]). The fact that both Kimura and Nagahara disclose meeting rooms across multiple display systems, makes this combination more easily implemented. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KWIN XIE whose telephone number is (571)272-7812. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Temesghen Ghebretinsae can be reached at (571)272-3017. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KWIN XIE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2626
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 05, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 21, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 20, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12717471
DISPLAY METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12717146
AUGMENTED REALITY HEADSET WITH CONTROLLABLY DIMMABLE FILTER
1y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12704926
ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
1y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697543
Varying Just Noticeable Difference (JND) Threshold or Bit Rates for Game Video Encoding Based on Power Saving Requirements
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12694843
ELECTROPHORETIC DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+31.8%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 450 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month